The Chariot Wars and Rumors of Wars
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
americanmusicmachine
February 13th 2010


3953 Comments


yeah but Scogin's a great vocalist and it makes up for all the band's other faults to a degree.

Comatorium.
February 14th 2010


5058 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

yeah... count and jules... who the fuck are you?

Countess
February 14th 2010


818 Comments


why do you insist on defending a bad review?

Comatorium.
February 14th 2010


5058 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Ha the review isnt bad. annnnd, you two need to grow up.

Countess
February 14th 2010


818 Comments


well 5 of 11 thought it was well written so that makes it pretty bad.

who needs to grow up?

just realized count was on this thread, the guy's gonna think we're trolling him!

witchxrapist
February 14th 2010


11117 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5



true that explains why he still likes screamo





:c:c:c

Rationalist
February 14th 2010


880 Comments


i agree with witchxraspist for once

Comatorium.
February 14th 2010


5058 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Rationalist, this review is pretty decent.



In other news, regardless of their live show, The Chariot is pretty much the epitome of Josh Scogin fail.

JulesWin
February 14th 2010


993 Comments


"yeah... count and jules... who the fuck are you? "

well who the fuck are YOU? a crappy reviewer who defends OTHER crappy reviewers?

Comatorium.
February 14th 2010


5058 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

And this album in particular.

JulesWin
February 14th 2010


993 Comments


you defend this album which you rated as a 2?

DivinityOfPan
February 14th 2010


85 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

The review isn't as bad as some of the people here make it out to be, as it explains the music well, and Rationalist backs up his points well. However, what he said could easily have been said in a manner less complex.

JulesWin
February 14th 2010


993 Comments


maybe not terrible but you would think that after 50 reviews he could express his thoughts in a better way

DivinityOfPan
February 14th 2010


85 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Perhaps, but I have read far worse material and have treated it as if it was a higher caliber than the way you treat this review.

Jerrydavidson
February 14th 2010


102 Comments


Also, trying to defend your past account is obvious.

Rationalist = DivinityOfPan

JulesWin
February 14th 2010


993 Comments


Rationalist = DivinityOfPan

yep thats why he defends this review so strongly

Hyperstation
February 14th 2010


146 Comments


I like how Count and JulesWin have never written a review -.- Whatever, it's neither a good or bad review so I'm not pos'n or neg'n.



Hyperstation
February 14th 2010


146 Comments


Well, I often come on this site to have discussions about music and read reviews. And sometimes when I see trolls I like to tear them apart :D

DivinityOfPan
February 14th 2010


85 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Saying a review doesn't completely suck doesn't make me Rationalist.

JulesWin
February 14th 2010


993 Comments


well I didn't know you had to write a review in order to pos or neg.
Apparently writting shitty reviews makes someone an authority on whether a review is good or bad



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy