Ulver Perdition City
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Underflow
March 10th 2016


5297 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Used to be one of my favorite Ulver records, but not so much anymore. The second half of the record feels like a totally different album and sucks me out of the experience.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 10th 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

YOU FLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLY

someguest
March 10th 2016


30126 Comments


Used to be one of my favorite Ulver records, but not so much anymore. The second half of the record feels like a totally different album and sucks me out of the experience.


First time I've heard that one.

Mongi123
March 10th 2016


22035 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Or rather float drift...

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 10th 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

Through an enormous dark room

A room of noises

Endless shimmering glissandi

Crackling pizzicato

Mongi123
March 10th 2016


22035 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Coal black

Turbulence holes of bass drones

Otherwise empty

No planets, no meteorites

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 11th 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

If anything, perhaps fine dust clouds of exploded muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusiiiiiic



You float there, somewhere between pleasure and feeeeeeear

budgie
March 11th 2016


35790 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

....nowhere.....

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 11th 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

c a t a s t r o p h e

Mongi123
March 12th 2016


22035 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

That sax, THAT FUCKING SAX. They just hit you with it at full volume in Lost In Moments.

Mythodea
March 12th 2016


7457 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

First half is monumental, indeed.

budgie
March 15th 2016


35790 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

neuropa site says mine was shipped on 14th feb. anyone get theirs yet?

budgie
March 15th 2016


35790 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

wait lmao it was shipped today! 3/14. though i preordered it 2/07 Q_Q

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 19th 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

budgie, mine's stuck in NYC customs since the 3rd

budgie
March 21st 2016


35790 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

fripper did you get it? mine came a couple days ago. sleeve is nice and the inside is the same design as previous pressing I bad but overall feels a little cheaper. record sounds fine though I don't mind the remastering

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 21st 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

yep, it showed up yesterday actually. If you check in with Neuropa by email (they send a confirmation email with details, just reply with your order number and a request for your shipping number and they'll get back to you) (for anyone who hasn't got theirs yet and is wondering where it's at)



I can't compare it to the original 2010/11 pressings, but I like how they added the Metamorphosis EP on the last side to justify the extra cost. I'd rather it be that way instead of a 54 minute record crammed onto two sides like it's Bob Dylan's Desire all over again.



The packaging is nice, simple - it's really how all records should be honestly. The recent trend of gimmicky covers and all this nonsense has outworn its welcome. A poster is cool, but a pop-up cover that warps the records like the Father John Misty did is just too much.

budgie
March 21st 2016


35790 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

what's the issue in having the total playtime on just one disc, does it affect the quality? I like just having to flip the album once lol. by sleeve quality I just mean it feels thinner and more flimsy but it's a beautiful design of course, just like war of the roses, gorgeous design

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 21st 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

In most cases, yes - depending on the dynamics of the record. Quieter stuff could get away with having almost an hour's worth of music on just one LP, but something more louder would just sound awful (Todd Rundgren's Initiation album is a good example). The dynamics and sound of an album is a good reason why some labels like Warp even put 40 minute album on 2LP (Flying Lotus' You're Dead! album was 38 minutes long with side one being 8 minutes. They added a three minute bonus track at the end, but even then it wasn't worth the price (it was $28 when it came out on vinyl) and wasn't needed on more than just one LP). Something over 50 minutes I can get why it would get split, but anything less it should just stay on one LP unless the sequencing would render it impossible.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 21st 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.6

As for the sleeve quality, if we compare it to the stock quality from today's releases it's a bit thinner. However, nothing will ever beat the flimsiness and incredibly fragile feel of any U.K. pressings of an album from the 70s/80s. They used a whole lot less paper stock or whatever than the U.S. did (assuming you're from the States as well).

BigPleb
March 21st 2016


65784 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

YOUR BODDYYYYY



DECOOMMMPOSESSSSSSSS



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy