Tuneyards' issue for me has always been longevity.
|
| |
i don't understand tune-yards at all
|
| |
Never heard Tune-Yards before, but this is wild--Wow.
|
| |
this is really, really good, eli. i loved their debut as well though, and almost just as much. i'd still say give it a try though.
great review greg, as per usual
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.2
"Their" debut.
:D
|
| |
force of habit lol
|
| |
Sorry, Irving. Your review will still get flagged if you decide to post one.
Ah. I didn't know that. Given his rating his review of this will be quite different. So, that makes sense that this review exists.
not really the point in either case
|
| |
Not cool on stealing a dib. It doesn't matter that his will be featured. That was a really shit backhanded apology.
|
| |
interested in this, whatever it may be
|
| |
Adam, you and Eli both covered Acceptance Speech when I clearly dibbed it but I saw no point in being a dick
SO
let's not give Greg shit even though we like giving him shit. Guy clearly meant no harm
|
| |
we need to have a talk
|
| |
This is awesome
|
| |
I posted it at least after release date. You can double up a review but at least wait until the original has a chance. That's all. I
believe I posted after you had yours up. Dibs doesn't mean no one else can do it, it just means let the person who called it be
first/have a chance to write it.
|
| |
hey
|
| |
guys pls
|
| |
humorous thread gj fellas
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
I think this is the first time I have seen staffers fight/argue. It is kinda unprofessional (regardless of how serious it is).
So someone reviewed something before someone else. Why is this cause for shit talk? There have been plenty of albums this past year that have gotten SEVERAL featured reviews (by both staffers and the plebs).
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.8
professional music writing is srs business
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
I am not saying everyone needs to pretentious pricks, but holy hell this thread took a turn for the worst.
|
| |
This thread is bigger than you
|
| |
|