I'd take Limp Bizkit over these poor excuses for musicians any day.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"Wait, are you telling me this isn't good?"
It looks that way.
"I bet it's easy to write so many songs when you use the same notes for every riff"
Exactamundo. Although, to give them some credit, they have changed it up marginally over their last 3 albums. Of course, that took some time away from the lyric-writing side of things.
"but whyyyy???"
I feel like a stronger person who can handle hardship better now.
Sorry Snide. Time, Life & Emmure have got in the way.
As for Limp Bizkit, I was definitely a sucker for 'Chocolate Starfish' back in the day. Hey, it was some catchy stuff.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
Keep rollin, rollin, rollin....
|
| |
I DID IT 4 TEH NOOKIE
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
agreed this was fucking terrible
|
| |
Great review by the way Davey
|
| |
listened to two of the tracks you said were "good" (grave markings + kids) and both were bad : (
the closer wouldn't have been that terrible if it was kept instrumental but that wouldn't be any fun, would it, frankie?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off
ugh
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
Thanks Atari.
And when I said those 2-3 songs were "good", it's all relative. If I was to rate them individually, we're talking about 2.3-2.7
|
| |
"I feel like a stronger person who can handle hardship better now."
*tips hat*
|
| |
I dont even think the musicians are bad, this whole record sucking is totally Frankie's fault. TAS aren't amazing, but its Vincent that makes the band good in the first place. Suck ass record thats all that needs to be said.
|
| |
"I just realised the 3 good songs on here are tracks 5, 10 & 15"
"those 2-3 songs were "good", it's all relative. If I was to rate them individually, we're talking about 2.3-2.7"
i think it's because the songs actually sound kind of fun, and have some not half bad riffs. but then frankie is an idiot all over the song and it sucks again. i mean really the guy is just so fucking obnoxious. if they had a different vocalist maybe emmure wouldn't suck so much. and if they cut down all the useless songs and made albums from the "'2-3" good songs then they'd have a decent album.
just my 2 cents.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
This actually has a half-decent album cover, surprising
|
| |
isn't it just frankie trying to be badass?
|
| |
Everyone hates on LB, however I remember when they first dropped they had quite a diverse fan base.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"I dont even think the musicians are bad..."
Tbh, it's really difficult to tell. Their early stuff was pretty bland musically speaking & they've definitely improved with the multiple line-up changes, but I dunno.
DatBeefPudding, I think Frankie can be a good & diverse singer when he wants to be, but just can't resist all that macho crap. Now that they have released 6 LPs, I'd say if you take the best 2 songs off of each of them, you'd have a decent album that could rate in the 3.0-3.5 range 9as scary as that sounds).
Maybe Frankie has a cold & doesn't want to spread his germs on the album cover. What a thoughtful man.
|
| |
Frankie is that socially awkward kid in middle school. He gets picked on because he is awkward, so to stand up for himself he says ridiculous things. Because he says ridiculous things, he gets picked on even more. It is a vicious cycle. I'm not telling people to like Emmure, but I do think the heat should be taken off of Frankie and I think there might be a change.
|
| |
davey: haha after hearing those, your summary is infinitely funnier (not that it wasn't funny to begin with). can't believe people actually this shit
|
| |
Which of their previous albums is this most similar to? ‘Felony’
bleak
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
My summaries are always puntastically funny. But sometimes they do need the album to be listened to be in on the joke.
|
| |
|