only problem i have with the review is you seem to make lots of generalizations or baseless claims
|
| |
or mention the actual sound of the music
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Thanks for reading it, it's only my eighth of hopefully many reviews, so the comments help.
I can see what you mean by that, it was always a problem of mine while writing essays too. I'll look out for it in the future.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
Considering the plethora if name drops, I wouldn't call it baseless.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I love the "I'm trying to get used to being an adult" aesthetic this album has
|
| |
nah sall good bro better than anything i could write just something to watch out for but i suppose with all the shit contribs and even couple of staff there are it doesnt really matter
|
| |
yeah i kinda meant blanket claims
|
| |
fucked up the words but im not a master of the ninja edit my apologies
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
Agreed with funeral. Too much thematic and legacy-based contemplation. Needs moar sound description.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@Hep
This conversation much better than the wall-of-text arguing of earlier.
I think the comments were more about what the genre meant for them, rather than the significance of the genre as a whole. It's my opinion that the pop-punk "umbrella" is too big, and that there's a very clear divide between the Yellowcards and Descendentses. Unfortunately, there isn't a discerning term I could have used without sounding like a genre geek (00s Pop-Punk, Pop-Punk-Emo, I'm cringing just thinking about it). I was talking about a certain kind of pop-punk, and I get how you'd be a bit defensive about me seemingly generalizing the genre under the terms of the more mainstream branch.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
Yeah, Rosa's right on the money. Cut down the length and you're looking at a good 7 to 8 essay score on the ap language
exam.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I love this album but this review does not do it justice. It reads like a high school essay as mentioned above and wastes too much time discussing the genre. It tells me what the album is without saying why I should like it. Its not so egregiously bad that I'd neg it, Its just not a great review. It also lacks stylistically but that's entire issue of opinion.
|
| |
i like they way he writes i mean the content isnt superb but the WAY HE WRITES is quite nice
and yeah i dont know what the point of ninja editing is i mean are you really that paranoid about what people think about u that u have to change wat u say lol
just go for the double post yo
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
I found that reading the review was a more pleasant experience than listening to the album.
And besides, since did reviews ever have to been "as good as the album?" A bad album doesn't necessarily justify a bad review.
|
| |
id like a joint hep how much
|
| |
hemp kat
|
| |
sitting on a throne od fope
|
| |
5 dollars?
|
| |
"Needs moar sound description."
It's excellent pop-punk music, that's really all that needs to be said. This isn't a genre where it's worthwhile to describe what the instruments are doing, how they interact etc.
|
| |
'I'd much rather talk about this album'
problem is the review doesnt do this as much as it prob needs to
|
| |
|
|
