Dinosaur Feathers
Fantasy Memorial


2.0
poor

Review

by Electric City USER (135 Reviews)
May 17th, 2010 | 88 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: RIYL: scientology (seriously, isn't it crazy)

In case you couldn’t tell from their album name, Dinosaur Feathers is a band that is trying too hard. Not trying too hard to be famous or anything, but to be, you know, hip and shit. You could find this out retrospectively, as I did, getting more pissed off at the contents of Fantasy Memorial with each calculated “idiosyncrasy” you discover that these guys attribute to themselves (see: their influences section on their Myspace page, which includes “scientology (seriously, isn’t it crazy)” and “bands who are too cool to put other bands as their influences,” which calls into question just how ironic they’re really being but I digress), but the better solution is to enjoy Fantasy Memorial as you might enjoy a Chicken McNugget: enjoy the tasty greasiness and remain blissfully unaware that it is probably killing you slowly. Whatever you do, just don’t think about it.

Because, and I’ll be honest about this, there’s nothing really offensively bad about Fantasy Memorial, at least not in a what-the-fuck-is-this? sort of way. Dinosaur Feathers blend the floor-tom-and-acoustic-guitar aesthetic one would associate with a Dodos album with the deliriously upbeat happiness that’s seemed to start getting frighteningly popular ever since Aim & Ignite shat a gumdrop on everyone’s heads, so it’s no wonder why Dinosaur Feathers are getting popular now; no one wants to be sad these days, and these guys’ campfire-tailored pop songs are geared towards achieving nostalgic smiles in remembrance of simpler times. Sure, they’re a little derivative about it; singer Derek Zimmerman certainly doesn’t mind taking up some of Avey Tare’s more recent inflection habits, nor does he mind making his album sound, at times, exactly like Sung Tongs, nor does he mind writing obvious harmonies in an ode to what many will say is the Beach Boys but is more likely to Fleet Foxes.

But being derivative isn’t a grievance that causes someone to, say, get really riled up and rant to the internet about the content of a low-profile album that will get an at-best modest chug from the press/hype machine. What does cause such an impassioned response is the shit-eating way they are derivative. Dinosaur Feathers do not seem to understand that just having the bubbly squish that opens Merriweather Post Pavilion open Fantasy Memorial will not make it the former and that aping elements from their influences (which also include Os Mutantes, pizza, procrastinating, Ruby Suns) and scattering them haphazardly through their album will not make it as cool as the albums that used the same shit. In Fantasy Memorial, you can constantly find moments that trace back to other bands, sometimes exact songs. "History Lessons" sounds straight from Yeasayer's repertoire, "Family Values" borrows the keyboard from "Benson Hedges" nearly verbatim, and in case you missed it the first few implications, these guys want to sound like Animal Collective. The resulting mess is maddening to wade through, and not even all that terrible, just really, really irritating.

See, if you were to take Fantasy Memorial at face value, then you’d end up with a mildly entertaining album packed with hooks enough to warrant a cursory onceormaybetwice-over and a reasonable assessment that “yea, this is good,” which is fine, really. But take, for example, “Teenage Whore,” an album standout both for catchiness and exemplariness of Fantasy Memorial’s pros and cons. It’s enjoyable, boasting an overwhelmingly charming melody, but has no depth if you think about it, and the more you really think about it, the more egregious it gets. With its jubilant tone it’s nearly possible to miss that, yes, this is a song about teenage prostitution and the chorus of ”Teenage whore, where do you get off?" isn’t just weirdly politically incorrect but misogynist, and like, kind of mean. It was probably meant ironically because Dinosaur Feathers seem to be all about quirkiness as a substitute for substance (also in their influences: cardboard dinosaurs, donuts, Google, Mali, National Geographic Magazine), but having a lark with something so serious by juxtaposing it with a tune more apt for a folk ballad or, shit, a love song comes off awkward, trite, and decidedly out of touch.

And no, I’ll take it Dinosaur Feathers aren’t sexist bastards, but they simply don’t get what makes the music they are so desperately trying to make work. Their kitschy, indie-is-hip brand of pop music fails because they don’t get that no, it isn’t 4000 harmonies and no, it isn’t super pleasantness that makes music cool. It’s truth, vital earnestness that makes, for example, a bunch of guys meowing a cool effect instead of a weird outlandish trick, or renders the thematic simplicity of “God Only Knows” heartbreaking instead of well-tread territory. I feel like Oscar’s partner Gil in that episode of The Office where Pam has an art show because I’m shitting on the courage and sincerity of a well-intentioned piece of art that obviously took a lot of hard work and effort to create. As Gil says, “Real art takes honesty and bravery,” which Oscar points out are not Pam’s strong points and nor are they Dinosaur Feathers’. Yes, there will still be Michael Scotts in the world for these guys, people who don’t care where Dinosaur Feathers comes from or what they’re saying who just enjoy listening to their music because it’s pretty and junk. But if the barometer by which Fantasy Memorial is measured is the same barometer that judges the albums Dinosaur Feathers unwittingly emulates, then no, the album isn’t a success, and no amount of uber-pleasant harmonies or illusory ramshackle-ness can fix that.



Recent reviews by this author
Beach Slang Cheap Thrills On A Dead End StreetThe Men Tomorrow's Hits
Macintosh Plus Floral ShoppeThe Dismemberment Plan Uncanney Valley
Justin Timberlake The 20/20 ExperienceThe Men New Moon
user ratings (16)
3.1
good


Comments:Add a Comment 
Electric City
May 17th 2010


15756 Comments


sorry dinosaur feathers

O.J. Simpson
May 17th 2010


408 Comments


Dinosaur Feathers, how do they work???

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
May 17th 2010


22500 Comments


Interesting. Adam, you sounded as if you had to convince yourself to rate this as low as a 2, hence this review being significantly longer than usual for you.

Waior
May 17th 2010


11778 Comments


this is probably my favorite review or yours, very awesome

but as i am waior, i want to hear this even more now

Shrapnel94
May 17th 2010


2213 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

meh

robin
May 17th 2010


4596 Comments


oh come now adderz.

i don't really care about the pseudo-hip thing. everything i listen to is such :p

Kiran
Emeritus
May 17th 2010


6133 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

See, if you were to take Fantasy Memorial at face value, then you’d end up with a mildly entertaining album, packed with hooks enough to warrant a cursory onceormaybetwice-over and a reasonable assessment that “yea, this is good,” which is fine, really.


i feel that



seriously sexy review

Romulus
May 17th 2010


9109 Comments


This review is really entertaining although I want to check it out now just to see if it fits the bill

SeaAnemone
May 17th 2010


21429 Comments


this sounds exactly like Margot and the Nuclear So and So's... maybe not even sound-wise, but in terms of why they're shit.

Romulus
May 17th 2010


9109 Comments


I see what you did there

Enotron
May 17th 2010


7695 Comments


Holy shit, Adam Downer review.

Very essay-like, but ultimately a very nice rant. I probably won't check this out because I've been too busy being a depressing fuck and listening to all the albums this year that have made my heart all warm and gushy(see: The Tallest Man On Earth).

Electric City
May 17th 2010


15756 Comments


Interesting. Adam, you sounded as if you had to convince yourself to rate this as low as a 2, hence this review being significantly longer than usual for you.


Nah Davey, I think the length has more to do with the fact that I didn't like it off the bat but no one else I talked to seemed to be getting the same feeling I was.

Roach
May 17th 2010


2148 Comments


getting dem sexual feelings og haah

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
May 17th 2010


22500 Comments


"Nah Davey, I think the length has more to do with the fact that I didn't like it off the bat but no one else I talked to seemed to be getting the same feeling I was. "

Ahhh, you put up a stronger, more multi-pronged case to convince them. Fair call.


StreetlightRock
May 17th 2010


4016 Comments


Review is win.

Phil
May 17th 2010


1473 Comments


What does RIYL mean?

Skimaskcheck
May 17th 2010


2364 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

a 2 whoa, didn't think it was that bad, nothing special though.

you seem to like italicizing stuff more than me!

also, couple o' things:

...because I’m shi[suze=2]t[/size]ting on the courage and...



...not Pam’s strong points and nor are they Dinosaur Feathers.
rogue apostrophe at the end

BigTuna
May 17th 2010


5907 Comments


nice nice nice nice

robin
May 17th 2010


4596 Comments


i find it kinda strange that this album would give off such a negative reaction because of the way people are just like 'just look past the corniness and enjoy it!' to these sort of albums (i.e. new agaisnt me! stuff and things can warrant a 3.5 just by letting the album in). but then i listen to "history lesson" and it helps justify your review's rating hah. nice read.

AggravatedYeti
May 17th 2010


7683 Comments


sounds kinda like AC minus the acid. : (



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy