Why?
|
| |
because he can
|
| |
could we perhaps not
|
| |
Kinda wish this was an announcement for a single releasing in 2041.
|
| |
not bad
|
| |
Tat news title : /
|
| |
"Kinda wish this was an announcement for a single releasing in 2041."
Loooooool
|
| |
incredibly lazy song holy shit
|
| |
i hope the song 23 years from now is better than this one
|
| |
Sounds like a worse version of a song from Stranger in Us All tbh
|
| |
I'm gonna pretend this doesn't exist
|
| |
i hope the song 23 years from now is better than this one [2]
I haven't actually listened to the track yet
|
| |
Oh, so this isn't a single coming out 23 years from now?
|
| |
I'll stick with the new Judas Priest thank your very much.
|
| |
Kinda wish this was an announcement for a single releasing in 2041 (3)
|
| |
"Kinda wish this was an announcement for a single releasing in 2041."
"i hope the song 23 years from now is better than this one"
Bwahahaha
|
| |
so misleading title
|
| |
I thought it might have been a cool time capsule thing but uh
yeah this was toast about three seconds in
|
| |
They're nothing without Dio.
|
| |
not really
Down to Earth and Stranger in Us All are super underrated
And Ronnie Romero is an excellent singer. The song just feels super lazy
|
| |
Just as lame and forgettable as all their other post-Dio stuff tbh.
|
| |
uhhhhh
|
| |
This really isn't a flat out bad song, it's just a really, really outdated one that sounds 40 years behind the times and not in the good kind of way.
|
| |
unless this is some long lost Dio recording, then i'll pass.
|
| |
Perfectly competent song, but terribly boring - 2/5
|
| |