As soon as I'm done eating tacos and watching the Angels fuck up you're goin' down.
lmao
also do a bwp review after this if you really wanna fuck with people
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Yeah, damn them for making good songs! all pop music is well-arranged, does that mean all pop music is good?Yeah, who wants a record that flows well? Not me! you missed the next part where I made the point oh well
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The part that’s most annoying is how well-arranged it all is
Yeah, damn them for making good songs!
All the songs blend far too well together
Yeah, who wants a record that flows well? Not me!
You took those a little out of context.
|
| |
this is too good to be a 2.5
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
lol?
|
| |
where?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
You said this was too good to be a 2.5. I thought there was a typo somewhere in your sentence.
|
| |
Yeah I was kidding. It's not that bad though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
all pop music is well-arranged, does that mean all pop music is good?
no but 'well-arranged' isnt their reason for being bad
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
that was my point...
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
uh
then youre making no sense at all
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
it's his reason as to why they're bad.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
it’s like they recorded the thoughts of an autistic kid and knew anyone who liked this record could relate.
thats a little unnecessary don't you think
“Don’t look now, but Merriweather Post Pavilion might just be” audible brain damage.
you should listen to danse manatee
edit: how is 'well-arranged' a bad thing i dont get this
'well' in itself implies a good quality doesnt it
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
all pop music is well-arranged, does that mean all pop music is good?
You can argue any music is good, its all objective, I just don't understand how you can fault the band for making well arranged music; you would rather have it be the opposite?
you missed the next part where I made the point oh well
No, I saw it, but isn't the point of pop music to be catchy and redundant? If there wasn't repetition in the rhythm the songs wouldn't work.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"You can argue any music is good, its all objective,"
subjective*
"No, I saw it, but isn't the point of pop music to be catchy and redundant? If there wasn't repetition in the rhythm the songs wouldn't work."
catchy maybe redundant no
devil's advocate :{
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
You can argue any music is good, its all objective, I just don't understand how you can fault the band for making well arranged music; you would rather have it be the opposite? well-arranged is indeed a positive quality, I just commented that it happens to be a shame that even though it is well-arranged, the music isn't good to meNo, I saw it, but isn't the point of pop music to be catchy and redundant? If there wasn't repetition in the rhythm the songs wouldn't work. so you're saying I should like redundant music?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I think the reviewer is trying to express that it's too consistent throughout.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
its all objective
you mean subjective.
The point of pop music isn't to be redundant. Catchy: yes; redundant: no.
Also, I think what he's trying to say is this record is bad because it sucks at being good.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Subjective, yes, thanks.
The redundant part relates to the point I made with the repetitive rhythm.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"you mean subjective.
The point of pop music isn't to be redundant. Catchy: yes; redundant: no."
owned you made the exact same post as me hehe
|
| |
|
|
