Album Rating: 3.5

do you read your posts after you type them?

Album Rating: 4.0

Don't really see how people could dislike the second half at least - it's pretty much vintage Radiohead - both in terms of sound and quality.

Album Rating: 2.5

the second half is alright. better than the first, sure. "lotus flower" is sorta catchy; "codex" is boring and they've done that type of song fifty times over, and better; "give up the ghost" is good; "separator" is cool but the whole "let's hold out and not give them a big climax!" mindset starts working against it when the song sort of just keeps looping

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

sup fire

dis be gay

Album Rating: 3.5

still sweet

holy shit fireabove posting a review again am i seeing things

Nope; this is really haaaaappening, happening. I mean, I pretty much coerced him into posting these.

Like this because the music's good, don't give a fuck who made it

Album Rating: 4.0

don't get how other bands can get praised for making the same album over and over when radiohead get critically raped for not radically shifting sound every single album

Album Rating: 4.5

^^ so much truth in both of those comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Seriously. This is my aoty.

we see the band radiohead as a fetish now not as artist

Album Rating: 4.0

Seriously. This is my aoty.

Album Rating: 4



Someone call Dr. House, I need some goddamn vicodin

Album Rating: 2.5

Like this because the music's good, don't give a fuck who made it

Radiohead get critically raped for not radically shifting sound every single album

Album Rating: 2.5

Great review, completely agree (Pos)

Or..or maybe I don't like it anyway

Album Rating: 4.0

Didn't you have this as a 4.5 Dev?

Album Rating: 2.5

like mine? i dont think i said anything that implied that This Being a Radiohead Album is critical to my disliking it

Didn't you have this as a 4.5 Dev?