Grizzly Bear
Painted Ruins


4.0
excellent

Review

by ian b. USER (42 Reviews)
August 21st, 2017 | 27 replies


Release Date: 2017 | Tracklist

Review Summary: frontal lobe disintegration; let the ocean take me.

Euphoria seems like such a hopeless pursuit. Being satisfied with something enough to take you to a higher state of being just doesn’t really seem possible. But the issue a lot of people don’t really notice with “euphoria” is: since it’s all in the head, isn’t it theoretically controlled by what you let take you? That was my issue previously with getting into more psychedelic types of music/art. You can’t necessarily just go into a record expecting it to just lift you. It sounds a tad cheesy, but you legitimately have to immerse yourself into it. You can’t just throw on Close To The Edge and expect it to throw you into the clouds like it’s nothing. Granted if any record could it’d probably be Close To The Edge, but I digress; the thing is with psychedelic music, it’s more than just a genre to take drugs to. Painted Ruins is a showcase of why psychedelic music is so much more than drugs or having a musical “high”.

The sonic landscapes Grizzly Bear gloss the canvas with Painted Ruins is anything but little. The record plays on every aspect that made albums like Shields and Veckatimest so great and amplifies them to the best of their abilities. The maturity showcased on Painted Ruins airs a much less indie-folk inspired Animal Collective worship, and gives a more melancholic synth-fueled approach with broad atmosphere. The imagery that the overall soundscapes provokes a sky always pitch black, yet with a beautiful sunrise in the distance shaded a rough champagne pink, with swirling lavenders that twist their way around the edges. The unique structures of songs like “Aquarian” or “Glass” provide such a refreshing feel to today’s modern psychedelia, where awkward pop infusions and lackluster performances are becoming more than commonplace. The brilliant production and improved instrumentation, especially from drummer Christopher Bear, only contribute to this. Bear’s performances on songs like “Four Cypresses” and “Sky Took Hold” give a triumphant and uplifting counterpart to frontman Ed Droste’s dreary vocals coupled with the beautifully grating synths that appear all over Painted Ruins. The atmosphere and ambition Grizzly Bear accomplish here only works to move the currently slumped psychedelic-pop scene into more sensible territories for the better.

The pure melancholic psychedelic pop take on their previously freak-folk inspired works really paint a canvas of a dreary yet ravishing aura with Painted Ruins that so many bands try so hopelessly to replicate. The vocals from Droste are only on the incline, the ambient shaded production, and the toned down (for the better) instrumentals only add even more extravagance to the gorgeous canvas provided with Painted Ruins. The small flaws such as occasionally over the top exotic instruments or odd synthesizer pieces only act as a small hairline fractures to the big picture. With Painted Ruins, Grizzly Bear dust the old pictures off the wall, and ruin them with the darkest fluorescents in the best damn way a modern psychedelic band really can do.



Recent reviews by this author
Car Seat Headrest Twin Fantasy (Face to Face)McCafferty Yarn
Joyce Manor Joyce ManorJPEGMAFIA Veteran
Migos Culture IITiny Moving Parts Swell
user ratings (294)
3.7
great
other reviews of this album
dbizzles (4.5)
A bridge to the past, built by well-traveled men....



Comments:Add a Comment 
ianblxdsoe
August 21st 2017


1921 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

hi blush proofread like the first half of this so shoutout to that guy i have notes to take that are due in twenty minutes nice this albums good check it out heck!

ianblxdsoe
August 21st 2017


1921 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

also can't tell if this is the highest 3.5 on the face of the earth or a low 4

conditionals
August 21st 2017


557 Comments


good review

theBoneyKing
August 21st 2017


24376 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Nice review. Been getting into this band the past few weeks. Looking forward to hearing this.

Sowing
Moderator
August 21st 2017


43941 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Ah, Grizzly Bear - masters of the 3.9 avg rating.

JohnZapp
August 21st 2017


159 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Disagree with the rating but well written review. It has taken almost 10 listens to really notice how beautifully crafted this album is

ianblxdsoe
August 21st 2017


1921 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yeah i gave this about 6 and a half listens and i'm only loving it more so i might bumo the review rating anyways

Panzerchrist
August 21st 2017


730 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Quite a few grammar and structural problems on here. A couple more proofreads would have done this review some good.



Album is excellent. I get the impression that a lot of the lower scores associated with this album are from people who gave this a once-over and hit the button, because it rewards multiple spins. The band even said so before the album dropped.

ianblxdsoe
August 21st 2017


1921 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

can you elaborate?? and yeah i agree it took a while to set in definitely

Papa Universe
August 21st 2017


22503 Comments


Painted Ruins > Science Fiction
fo sho

Conmaniac
August 21st 2017


27676 Comments


nicely done ian, psych rock reviews ftw (;

would've been cool to tie in the idea of euphoria back into the review but what i've noticed with your intros is that they act as a thematic jumping off point instead of a critical idea to your review.

juiceviaorange
August 21st 2017


1050 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I need my Science Fiction erection to dissipate before I can give this some attention. I'll probably get around to it this weekend.

theBoneyKing
August 21st 2017


24376 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This band's more psych folk than psych rock Con but yeah the sentiment still holds

dbizzles
August 21st 2017


15193 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Nice review, broseph!

luci
August 21st 2017


12844 Comments


Had lots of issues with this review while reading. Didn't seem like you've heard any other record by this band: they've never released anything "freak-folk" and they've always been "melancholic" (a word I recommend you move away from since it's never specific). This sentence is vague and comes across as filler: "The record plays on every aspect that made albums like Shields and Veckatimest so great and amplifies them to the best of their abilities." Also contradicts the main angle of your review that this album is a shift from their previous sound. You also shouldn't be making claims like this if you haven't heard their discography. "The maturity showcased on Painted Ruins." Avoid saying "maturity," it's rarely accurate or relevant.
"The sonic landscapes Grizzly Bear gloss the canvas with Painted Ruins is anything but little." This doesn't make any sense. Not sure what this is supposed to mean.
"The brilliant production and improved instrumentation" How is the production brilliant? How is the instrumentation improved? This communicates little to the reader unless it's expanded on.
"The vocals from Droste are only on the incline" Bad phrase, I assume you mean they are improving? Again this isn't touched on in the review and needs to be stated in the context of their other albums.
"The imagery that the overall soundscapes provokes a sky always pitch black" Are you sure? They evoke daytime warmth and garden lushness throughout most of this.
Overall I didn't feel this review was effective because of the vague descriptors and lack of familiarity with their previous work. More proofreading and holistic critique was needed by an editor.


theBoneyKing
August 21st 2017


24376 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

On Lucid's point about the vocals, you don't mention Daniel Rossen's vocals and it seems strange to address Droste and not him as, while I haven't heard this one yet, they share vocals roughly equally on the previous 3 albums so I assume they do here as well.

ianblxdsoe
August 21st 2017


1921 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i'll say i'm not incredibly familiar with their past works so sorry if that comes off quite visibly in the review (especially to non-fans) but i had heard all of their records a couple times in passing (i probably have like 15-20 clocked on their last record actually) but to me i identified as kinda freak folk especially since i found out about grizzly through my friends that were into AnCo so. but when it comes to the overall descriptors, it's based on perspective. i perceived it as a fairly dark record sonically. kinda like beach house but not really, whereas it's a bright happy sound but feels like it's coming from a dark place if that makes sense. anyways thank you for the criticism though it helps a lot. i could definitely see why a lot of those mights anger someone but it's my personal perspective you have to remember that

luci
August 21st 2017


12844 Comments


Not angered at all just would like to see you improve, you remind me of Downer when he first started out on this site. Some bands can be analyzed without knowledge of their discog but not Grizzly Bear (or the National for the prying eyes who will be attempting that next month). I agree that the mood and setting can be interpreted subjectively, that was a minor point I had. Thanks for being receptive to criticism, it will serve you well.

Drifter
August 21st 2017


20811 Comments


Would I dig

ianblxdsoe
August 21st 2017


1921 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

perhaps, and yeah lucid i'm gonna try and tackle that for better or for worse but i fucking love the national so it might go well



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy