The Clash
London Calling


4.0
excellent

Review

by TWD1976 USER (3 Reviews)
May 25th, 2017 | 13 replies


Release Date: 1979 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Smashing that bass on the album cover was showing a clear message - the 3-chord crap was done, and with a vibrant disdain, The Clash were set to out-punk the punks.

The Clash had helped invent punk in the late seventies, as a violent reaction to the prog rock that was the mainstream. Now a few years later, punk was mainstream. The solution? They duped the record company into letting them do a "bonus 12-inch single" so they had two records to fill, and then unleashed the most eclectic album their cohorts had ever witnessed. Their orthodox roots don't go hurtling out the window, but it certainly looks like that on the surface at first. The famous songs from this album - the title track, 'Guns of Brixton' and 'Train in Vain' - were really my introduction to The Clash, and I was surprised to hear clear-cut punk, a reggae fusion and jangly almost-MOR derivative on the expectant sound. This only scratches the surface. The masters were ready to show the students they were still in the game, and ready to beat them at it in a way the students had never seen. Punk rock was the establishment now, but The Clash were not afraid to be anti-establishment once more. They hollered 'phony Beatlemania has bitten the dust' on the title track, but really phony punk-mania was ready to bite the dust. Because that's what I love the most about London Calling. It's a wonderful punk record BECAUSE the band that are playing on it are wary of punk music, simultaneously loving and hating what they had honed. They knew that something new had transpired in the atmosphere. And they responded by releasing one of the musically far-reaching double-albums ever. One of the doubles actually that works.

I wasn't sure whether I would like such a long album. On top of that, the amount of music styles that covered in just over an hour is quite frankly a little overwhelming at first. Simple punk, downtempo jazz, hard rock, reggae, pop and ska are all melded together in a weirdly intricate way that, if it wasn't so intricate, should come apart and resound as a musical plane crash of a failure. Some say "this is where The Clash do everything right". I wouldn't agree completely, but there's no denying that the first thirty-three-and-a-half minutes (tracks 1 through to 10 or the first LP) are nearly flawless, some of my personal highlights being the reggae-style pop of 'Rudie Can't Fail' and the lightweight disco vibe of 'Lost in the Supermarket'.The odd ska-punk hybrid 'Hateful', however, strikes a somewhat strange chord that in my personal opinion doesn't quite flow. The second half, on the other hand... is a mixed bag if I ever heard one. Maybe it's because gets slightly bloated at points, but part of me supposes that double-LPs have never really been my 'thing'. Despite the excessiveness, the band are still on fire, streaking through fusion cuts like 'The Card Cheat' and brutal hard-rock like 'I'm Not Down'. But their previous ability to make white reggae collapses at 'Revolution Rock', a durge-fest that drags for nearly six minutes. Thankfully 'Train in Vain' follows it, because that song is the perfect closer and bookend to go with 'London Calling'. Those who though The Clash couldn't do gentler rock songs were fooled.

I can mostly appreciate how this album cast its bright reflection over a generation or two, and is an enjoyable middle-finger to those who thought The Clash were musically grounded. They had clearly come a long way from the slightly roughened group that did tunes like 'Complete Control', although that song in question proved the band were giving middle-fingers from the start. The establishment had moved, and so had they. So obviously their third album was an oxymoronic journey, but a journey that paid off for about 85% of the time. This is just the perfectly focused sound of four frustrated individuals spreading their wings in the good name of rock 'n' roll. Only they were willing to do lots of twists and turns at frantic speed. What the band did on London Calling was take the OED definition of postmodernism - "characterised by the self-conscious use of earlier styles and conventions, and a mixing of different artistic styles and media" - and have quite a lot of fun with it whilst adhering to it, ending up with what I'm sure sounded weird for the sake of weird when it hit the shelves in the closing days of the seventies - the mid-December of '79, actually. Despite a few blunders along the way, the spirit is as fresh as ever and the proverbial box is truly being thought outside of. This album won't be an instant classic and takes time to really get through to you, but when it does, the majority of the songs make it really brilliant.


Number of tracks: 19
Accumulative score: 78/95
Average score: 4.11/5


user ratings (2825)
4.4
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
butcherboy
May 25th 2017


9464 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Don't know if I agree with your history.. Clash were essentially a pub rock band that were following punk and ska trends, hardly setting them, mind you, doing it incredibly well.. well-written though.. so pppppos

Satellite
May 26th 2017


26539 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"Number of tracks: 19

Accumulative score: 78/95

Average score: 4.11/5"

there are probably dumber ways to score an album but i can't think of any atm

Tyler.
May 26th 2017


19019 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I give this album a 21/23 very good



Or alternatively a 2.4/3

Ocean of Noise
May 26th 2017


10970 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

That scoring totally makes sense though. Every track is marked out of a possible 5 marks. 5 x 19 = 95. Then he converts the fraction so that the album is rated on a scale of 1 to 5.

Tyler.
May 26th 2017


19019 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

fuck you

TVC15
May 26th 2017


11372 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

[2]

TheLongShot
May 26th 2017


865 Comments


To each their own but I definitely don't endorse that method of scoring, implies that an album can only be equal to the sum of its parts and ignores the record in a broader sense. That type of scoring could be good for compilations perhaps but not for normal studio albums IMO

Asdfp277
May 26th 2017


24275 Comments


the accumulative and average rating are the same lmao

Asdfp277
May 26th 2017


24275 Comments


i'm negging just because of that

TwigTW
May 26th 2017


3934 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I'm not sure if punk was mainstream when this was released, but this sure gave it a big push in that direction . . . Nice first review, I didn't know that stuff about tricking the record company into a releasing a double album.

Piglet
May 26th 2017


8473 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

that is one gorgeous graph mmm

Satellite
May 26th 2017


26539 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Westway to the World is an excellent doc chronicling the band's history that came out a couple yrs before Joe died. Highly, highly recommended.



This review doesn't deserve the negs it's receiving, especially since it's the user's first.

facupm
May 26th 2017


11844 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

i live by the riveeer



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy