Adjy
Prelude (.3333)


5.0
classic

Review

by owl beanie EMERITUS
May 24th, 2017 | 20 replies


Release Date: 2016 | Tracklist

Review Summary: and so what if i have to google what the song titles mean

Genre is confusing. The idea itself is a series of increasingly blurry lines, conflating and permuting until any kind of rational discourse is undone by a single adjective, like ‘post-‘ or ‘alternative’. Slap a label on it, move on.

Professedly, I get it. I get that annexing a label to music is a summary of its sound, ideology and the space it occupies within its subculture. It becomes problematic, though, when the discussion of genre motivates perception. Someone said the newest Godspeed record is heavy on drone? Guess I’ll give it a miss, then. It’s reductive and myopic.

To reconcile this phenomena with Adjy’s discography, Sputnik insists on calling the band ‘indie pop’ and sure, the cheerleader’s refrain in Praepositio could be considered pop, if the pop-star in question flirted with canonical literature and meta-lyricism. With this considered, it's interesting that ambiguous descriptors like 'indie' are at once wholly appropriate and even further from the truth than Dan Kaffee in A Few Good Men. Yet, Prelude (.3333) is not a lazy patchwork consisting of far-removed musical styles, but a creative synthesis of traditional instrumentation to form something natural and pioneering. Another Flammarion Woodcut’s musical theatre fleshes out its backstory with swelling backing vocals and keen-edged drum fills before turning off all the lights – a lone piano motif revealing the past’s effect on our narrator’s psyche. So, I guess you could call it indie pop, but you could also call it popera, or emo-pop, or indie rock, or does-it-really-matter-this-shit-is-good.

I like the idea that Prelude (.3333) is admirably difficult to pin down because it’s a prelude that is terrified of being forgotten or left behind. Praepositio throws itself at the listener, arguing tenaciously that the record is too rich and imaginative to be the foreword in some other narrative. I’m inclined to agree – the stampeding drumbeat makes the whole thing breathless, the vocals and guitars struggle to keep up, and two lyrical perspectives shout over each other until they sound like different philosophical discussions with all buzzwords and no substance. So, I guess you could call Adjy ‘philosophical thrash-pop’.

Like a brochure with actual, prolonged chapters, this record is unexpectedly verbose and overran with ideas. From the layered pontifications in Grammatology to the arrhythmic, stuttering vocal melody in Hyperthemesia, the EP deliberately takes wrong turns to make the journey more captivating. I think Prelude (.3333) will always feel anachronistic because you can’t pick its influences. To be fair, indie pop is a fine enough tag because it would be difficult to describe Adjy’s music without being annoyingly specific, and that’s testament to the interesting songwriting choices that litter the record. So, I guess you could call my listening experience ‘thoroughly impressed’, but I don’t want to split hairs.



Recent reviews by this author
The Tullamarines Ugly CryEarl Sweatshirt and The Alchemist Voir Dire
Humour pure miseryBalance and Composure Too Quick to Forgive
Dodheimsgard Black Medium CurrentJPEGMAFIA and Danny Brown Scaring the Hoes
user ratings (36)
4
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
Conmaniac
May 24th 2017


27677 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

dude your reviews have been on point as well as the stuff youve been reviewing. great EP, was just talking to a friend about this band

verdant
Emeritus
May 24th 2017


2492 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

ahah thanks con! just after i posted this i realised that someone reviewed Grammatology and that you'd commented on it.

this thing still blows my mind and i found it not long after it came out. i'm trying to review stuff that's underappreciated in a bid to get more people to listen, fingers crossed it's working

Conmaniac
May 24th 2017


27677 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

two things, first for some reason "The best thing about this EP, however, is that these ambiguous descriptors are both completely appropriate and further from the truth than Dan Kaffee in A Few Good Men." reads kinda awkward. maybe rephrase the end part.

also you can edit out that italicized i and just put a regular i in "shit" now and it should be fine! keep it up man (:

verdant
Emeritus
May 24th 2017


2492 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

thanks for the first one, i'll work something out in a sec.

also i tried swearin' like a grown-up and it came up with asterisks again so is that just a contrib/staff thing?

Conmaniac
May 24th 2017


27677 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

no the asterisks go away after you edit it! so what I do is i just put in the word then edit out the *** and it works

BlushfulHippocrene
Staff Reviewer
May 24th 2017


4052 Comments


Will listen. Once again refraining from hyperbolic praise, but good review.

verdant
Emeritus
May 24th 2017


2492 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

oh i'm dumbbbbb, thanks con.



blushful: once again, you don't need to refrain hahahahah

thanks though!

BlushfulHippocrene
Staff Reviewer
May 24th 2017


4052 Comments


Don't tempt me, Jack. You review too much and if I start I won't stop. Just keep up the good work.

verdant
Emeritus
May 24th 2017


2492 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

ahahah that's good enough for me man, thank you and i'll do my best :~)

Conmaniac
May 24th 2017


27677 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

also 17 reviews in a month and 10 days? jesus man youre just cranking em out.

verdant
Emeritus
May 24th 2017


2492 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

ahh yes, it's because my three loves are music, writing and not having a job

NastyCrab
May 24th 2017


853 Comments


This is too adjy for me

cvlts
May 24th 2017


9938 Comments


Very well written words but you spend way too much exposition trying to pin down the band's musical genre without actually explaining why this release is supposedly a 5/5 Classic. Not trying to be snarky, just not how I would personally do it.

Anyways, I noticed these guys a couple years back when Broken Circles first signed them. They only had a couple songs and thought they had a lot of potential. Really glad to see them starting to catch on.

verdant
Emeritus
May 25th 2017


2492 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

thanks for the advice!

treos777
June 4th 2017


593 Comments


this EP is great
though it is just a mix of their two previous EPs so i find it hard to take as its own thing
have you heard their first EP?

verdant
Emeritus
June 4th 2017


2492 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

yah i have. i heard this first though so its similarities to the other EPs aren't really valid criticisms for me to make ")

treos777
June 4th 2017


593 Comments


i wished they had repackaged all the tracks together - love every song they've released

Project
July 21st 2021


5822 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

idk how I missed this review and considering how much I love the LP, I wish I heard this first.



I can hear the glimmers of the themes explored under a rich layer of metaphor and cinematicness in the Idyll Opus, but the execution is lacking a bit for me, with the exception of Grammatology.

GreyShadow
August 24th 2021


7031 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

opener was WILD listening to this now

these guys and their gang vox is just the greatest thing

GreyShadow
August 24th 2021


7031 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

fuck, i hate this is like significantly more emo than Idyll Opus. just makes me wish Idyll Opus was emoier



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy