Death From Above 1979
You're a Woman, I'm a Machine


4.0
excellent

Review

by FoxMulder USER (2 Reviews)
April 29th, 2011 | 17 replies


Release Date: 2004 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Party Music

Death from Above 1979 were the first Indie band to ever really catch my eye. The combination of drums, bass, synth and vocals. The lo-fi producing, the punk attitudes. It was all so beautify executed. My knowledge of the Indie scene didn't extend too far upon release of this album. To me it was all a bunch of whiny Beatles copycats, and Death from Above were the exact opposite of that. There was a breath of fresh air on every release and this LP was no exception. They just did their thing, and rocked hard. It's not flashy nor is it trying to be some sort of revelation. It's only fatal flaw was it's time of release. With so many bands such as Lightning Bolt at the height of their popularity, it got caught it in a haze. It just sounded so redundant, however I believe it held a firm uniqueness and still does to this day.

Jesse F. Keeler and Sebastien Grainger show some fantastic musicianship on this album. The rapid, swampy, arpeggiating bass lines being accompanied perfectly by a an overwhelming amount of splashy high-hats, and tambourines. It's far from simple, but it doesn't feel fret wankery. The synth is featured in the lesser majority of the album. It compliments the sound more than you'd believe, but when it's gone you wont get the feeling that somethings missing. There isn't much that can be said about the vocals. They're just there. It's not a big departure in sound from Heads Up EP, but it shows substantial growth in the band. Arguably this is the better release.

Essentially it's party music. There's nothing profound to be found on the album, but there's something genius about that in itself. It's an album that just keeps pumping, and flowing like no other. Every song is danceable, singable, insanely catchy. There are some less noticeable tracks which may be dismissed first listen, but they aren't low points in the slightest. This album is fun, it never feels like a chore listening to it from start to finish. You can put it on in the background, it doesn't require your full attention but you'll still find yourself humming along. It's somewhat reminiscent of sludge/stoner metal, but anyone can enjoy this album. Wither you listen to The Melvins, or Death Cab For Cutie, it doesn't matter.

If you want to loosen up a bit, put down your Godspeed! album and have some stupid, silly fun, go out and grab this.

Favorite tracks:
Pull Out
Go Home, Get Down
Cold War
Black History Month


user ratings (1031)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
Zorg (3)
Death From Above 1979 get inside of you and show you a good time on You're a Woman, I'm a Machine. B...

pulseczar (3.5)
...

Two-Headed Boy (2.5)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Aids
April 30th 2011


24509 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"The combination of drums, bass, synth and vocals. The lo-fi producing, the punk attitudes."



those aren't sentences.



other than that pretty good review. I love these guys, I get to see them live at Sasquatch chicka yeeeeaaaaaah

FoxMulder
April 30th 2011


5 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Haha, my bad. My grammar can be pretty atrocious at times and every time I re-read it I find another mistake. I'll probably get someone to proof read these in the future, but I'm just trying this all out for now. I just read that they were playing there, tickets still on sale?

North0House2
April 30th 2011


6153 Comments


Isn't one of these guys in Crystal Castles now?
Maybe I'm wrong.
They have some pretty sweet riffs. Definitely not an album I would ever buy, however, it is certainly unique.

FoxMulder
April 30th 2011


5 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

He's in MSTRKRFT now.

liledman
April 30th 2011


3828 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

review really isnt very good. making generalised statements about indie throughout the review will not help your cause either.

iFghtffyrdmns
April 30th 2011


7044 Comments


anyone remember that kid who referred to anything that wasn't blink 182 / asking alexandria / attack attack as "indie shit".

what a twat

FoxMulder
April 30th 2011


5 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Relax, brah. I'm not attacking hipsters, and I listen to all the bands your little friends at pitchfork rave about.



"If you want to loosen up a bit, put down your Godspeed! album and have some stupid, silly fun, go out and grab this."



Take that piece of advice, and stop crying.

liledman
April 30th 2011


3828 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i like this album, and assuming im sticking up for hipsters or anything of the sort is silly. if you listen to all that pitchfork music, why feel the need to bring it up? the godspeed reference is unnecessary. take the criticism on board.

iFghtffyrdmns
April 30th 2011


7044 Comments


you do realize I wasn't talking about you, right? This record is awesome, I used to drive around jamming so hard to this back in my day

FoxMulder
April 30th 2011


5 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

My mistake, iFghtffyrdmns. I thought you were insinuating something.



Oh, I'm all for criticism so long as it stems farther than "This review sucks." If anything, I'd appreciate input on how to improve my reviews. Obviously length is a problem, and it's something I'm working on. I'll also be more careful with my proof reading.

DoubtGin
April 30th 2011


6879 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

band is so powerful

iFghtffyrdmns
April 30th 2011


7044 Comments


The combination of drums, bass, synth and vocals. The lo-fi producing, the punk attitudes.
I would fix those, as neither is a complete sentence (as has been mentioned).

It was all so beautify executed.
*beautifully

It's only fatal flaw was it's time of release.
*Its and *its

With so many bands such as Lightning Bolt at the height of their popularity, it got caught it in a haze. It just sounded so redundant, however I believe it held a firm uniqueness and still does to this day.
Not really sure what you're trying to say here, and these sentences just seem awkward, I would just take them out.

perfectly by a an overwhelming amount of splashy high-hats, and tambourines
take out that "a", and get rid of that comma at the end there

but it doesn't feel fret wankery
huh?

more than you'd believe
sounds awkward and I'm having trouble figuring out what you mean by this...

you wont get the feeling that somethings missing.
*won't, *something's

There isn't much that can be said about the vocals. They're just there.
Then why bother saying anything at all? Personally, I disagree and I think that the vocals give the record an entirely unique dynamic, but that's beside the point.

may be dismissed first listen
I would change it to "may be dismissed upon first listen" or something along those lines.


Overall, the third paragraph is your best... it's actually pretty decent and shows some promise in your writing ability. In general, avoid including blatant generalizations, try to make a little more mention of the record's specific sounds... even consider throwing a few song names in there and saying something about them. This isn't terrible for a second go, just make these fixes and this will suck a little less. Right on.

PenguinPants
April 30th 2011


5 Comments


There are no 'arpeggiating' (even a word?) basslines in this whole album.

Yotimi
April 30th 2011


7666 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Black History Month is my JAM

Spare
April 30th 2011


5567 Comments


find it kinda weird that there aren't many higher rated reviews of this

MusicIsMyFavorite
April 30th 2011


405 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Band is fucking awesome

bloc
April 30th 2011


69935 Comments


I wanna show you how the mail boy flirts



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy