owen
10.20.13 | Get hype |
KenboSlice
10.20.13 | Hopefully it doesn't suck like the Evil Dead remake. |
KingHarkinian
10.20.13 | I liked the Evil Dead remake. I love the trilogy. |
AtomicShane
10.20.13 | just saw this on reddit.... im stoked |
owen
10.20.13 | Sam didn't make the remake, so I'm sure this will be better.
Remember the goat and dancing demon scene in drag me to hell? |
AtomicShane
10.20.13 | i hope there's a scene where ash is depressed walking down a sidewalk |
EaglesBecomeVultures
10.20.13 | HOLLA |
Cormano
10.20.13 | lol I'm just about to finish the evil dead trilogy |
AtomicShane
10.20.13 | *quadrilogy....kind of |
Thor
10.20.13 | how do you perfect that which is perfect |
Cormano
10.20.13 | i havent seen the remake though, probably will do that tonite |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | basically if anyone doesn't know the full story. the new evil dead isn't exactly a remake, its more like a continueation. The plan is the same director is making Evil Dead 2 and Sami Rami is making Army of Darkness 2. Then the protagonist from the most recent evil dead's and ash are going to meet up and theres supposedly going to be an Evil Dead 7 that will tie the whole thing up. Hella stoked. I love the remake and I know army of darkness 2 will be awesome. |
Judio!
10.21.13 | Part of what made Army of Darkness so great is its low budget campiness. Could a 21st century sequal really do justice to the original? |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | It was great because it was funny and adventurous and because Bruce Campbell is awesome. He is still awesome and Sam Raimi is still a great director. It'll be awesome. |
XingKing
10.21.13 | I wonder if Bruce will get in shape for this role |
Judio!
10.21.13 | I guess you're right. You can't really go wrong with Sam Raimi. |
JustinKing
10.21.13 | This should be awesome. I love the first three films. Haven't seen the new one yet, sadly. |
JustinKing
10.21.13 | ^The third one, at least. The first two had some good moments, in my opinion. |
Judio!
10.21.13 | Allow me to rephrase: You can't really go wrong with Sam Raimi's Evil Dead movies. |
KenboSlice
10.21.13 | Sam Raimi made Darkman, which was fucking awesome. |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | the spiderman movies aren't even bad. just because they don't follow the comics doesn't mean it sucks. |
JustinKing
10.21.13 | I liked the first two to an extent. It's not that they didn't follow the comics, it's that Tobey Maguire wasn't that great a fit as Peter Parker, in my opinion. |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | I guess I never minded that he was spiderman. He did a great job with it imo. |
Judio!
10.21.13 | Spiderman 1 and 2 are good, but 3 was shit. |
Judio!
10.21.13 | I'm guessing you liked "The Amazing SpiderMan" better? |
TMobotron
10.21.13 | i love T Maggs, but i only really liked the first spiderman movie. Second is okay. Third could've been good if it wasn't retarded. |
JustinKing
10.21.13 | @Josh He was just a bit too melodramatic for my taste. It seemed he didn't feel confident in the role and overacted a bit to compensate. |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | I can see what you mean to an extent. I haven't seen them in a while but I always thought it worked. I mean if I was put into the role of a super hero with dead parents just out of high school trying to fit over the girl of my dreams with my best friend I might be a little bit melodramatic as well. but I can see why you wouldn't have liked it. |
DominionMM1
10.21.13 | groovy |
AtomicShane
10.21.13 | SUCK ON THIS |
TMobotron
10.21.13 | "william" dafoe |
owen
10.21.13 | I liked the spider-man movies, atleast the first two.
They were released before every comic movie became grimdark |
tempest--
10.21.13 | FUCK YOU SPIDERMAN RULES WHERE IS CRYMSONBLAZE |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | raimi rules
aod2 is gonna rule hard |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | hehe |
tempest--
10.21.13 | yesssssssss |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | hiiii! |
KingHarkinian
10.21.13 | I hope Ted Raimi is in this film. Joxer fucking rocks. |
Hyperion1001
10.21.13 | as long as it has slapstick deadites and jane levy being hot as fuck with bruce ill like it |
Trebor.
10.21.13 | can we stop talking about spider man finally |
Atari
10.21.13 | SPIDER MAN |
30secs2grnlinkinmuse
10.21.13 | hey guys i wanna talk about spider man |
owen
10.21.13 | Maniac Cop 4 when |
BallsToTheWall
10.21.13 | Sam Raimi made Darkman, which was fucking awesome. (2) |
BallsToTheWall
10.21.13 | Army of Darkness 2? Bruce Campbell? Done and done muh niggas. |
owen
10.21.13 | I'm sure it won't suck, raimi will stay true to the originals and will use cheesy props.
If he's going to use cg, well.... |
JustinKing
10.21.13 | Wasn't most of the new Evil Dead practical effects instead of CG? I remember hearing that before it was released. |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | the new one didn't use CG at all. |
JustinKing
10.21.13 | Still haven't seen the actual new film, but that's a little disappointing. Someone told me Raimi had confirmed it was all practical to keep it in the spirit of the older films. That had me excited to see how they'd look in a modern horror film. EDIT: Nevermind, then. Still excited to see it whenever I do. |
SIMBOLIC
10.21.13 | trve horror retvrns |
owen
10.21.13 | evil dead 2013 was 100% practical so i've heard |
Hyperion1001
10.21.13 | it wasnt, but it was mostly practical |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | not true. it was all practical. they also set the record for most fake blood used in a movie, beating Dead Alive's 20+ year reign with 50'000 gallons. |
owen
10.21.13 | the "I kick arse for the lord" dead alive? |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | yep. it had 1000 gallons of fake blood. and that seemed like a ton for that movie. |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | definitely not 100% practical, there are some clear spots of cgi
i think it might be similar to the thing remake where they originally did all practical effects, but some cgi was used for touch ups (except on the thing, they went over every damn thing in cgi) |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | they didn't even bring digital cameras to the set so CGI is impossible. there were digital effects used in post edits but that's not the same thing as CGI. and what parts are you referring too. |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | the whole arm removal scene has cgi
not the whole thing, mind you, but it's obviously touched up with it |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | the end or the shotgun, because actually neither of those did. watch the making of. |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | again, even if you think it's CGi it can't be, no digital cameras on set. |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | the electric knife. and yeah, it really is |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | It was not a computer generated image. it was done and touched up with wire removal and other such tools. that doesn't make it CGI. |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | look at the blood during that scene
some of it looks so fake |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | well it isn't human blood. its fake blood, still not computer generated. they probably just had to mix it different to get it to act the way it's supposed to. I mean in the original evil dead you can see them using a garden hose for the blood haha. |
Crymsonblaze
10.21.13 | i'm not saying the consistency of the blood looks bad, i'm saying it looks as if it's not really there
i dunno, i'd have to watch it again, as i've only seen it twice, but i remember thinking that a lot of it looked like there had been cgi touchups |
joshuahuntkc
10.21.13 | I mean I guess it's possible. They were pretty adamant about not using CGI though and from what I saw I'd believe it. I caught it 4 times in the theatre because all my friends kept wanting to see it and I got in free a bunch of times but who knows. |
Hyperion1001
10.21.13 | "they didn't even bring digital cameras to the set so CGI is impossible"
if this is a joke, haha. if you're serious then i dont know what to say
also it clearly has CGI in it, the entire first scene with the witch burning is basically CGI. |
owen
10.21.13 | Feature pls |
joshuahuntkc
10.22.13 | that was all real. |
owen
10.22.13 | Happened to my sister too |