fershizzle
11.11.07 | everything before rubber soul i treat as equal. |
Lunarfall
11.11.07 | Terrible list to be honest, but LIB is last, so that's good. |
MyRamona
11.11.07 | number 1 rightfully deserves that place. I would place Sgt Peppers much higher though, maybe 2 or 3. |
joshuatree
11.11.07 | really bad list man, abbey road needs to be bumped down like five spots |
clairvoyant
11.11.07 | glad to see magical mystery tour given some respect |
Jimmy
11.11.07 | I don't agree, but I can see where you're coming from. It would be too hard for me to rank the beatles albums. |
CoRpSeSlAyEr
11.11.07 | I honestly can't rank any album over the other, (except for Sgt. Peppers) because they're all so brilliant in their own way. |
Electric City
11.11.07 | Everything pre rubber soul is awful. |
CoRpSeSlAyEr
11.11.07 | Not Help! or Beatles For Sale. Those are still really good albums. |
fershizzle
11.11.07 | dont get me wrong, i love all these albums. but sgt. pepper and the white album just dont do as much for me as the others. |
fershizzle
11.11.07 | and abbey road kicks the shit out of any other thing the beatles have ever produced. |
Jimmy
11.11.07 | help! and hard day's night were pre rubber soul, are you going to say those albums are awful? They're right up there with anything else the beatles ever did. |
McP3000
11.11.07 | I like Let it Be :(
Anyway, i agree with Abbey road being #1 |
fershizzle
11.11.07 | jimmy: no, they're not. they suck comparitively.
and i treat them all equally. i still enjoy them however. they have great individual songs, but as albums as a whole, they are no match for any of these. |
Jim
11.12.07 | abbey road is their best album |
