Social Code
Rock 'N' Roll


1.5
very poor

Review

by Observer EMERITUS
March 24th, 2010 | 11 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: As dead as the skull on the cover

Social Code’s 2007 self-titled album was a faithful re-creation of all things young-made radio rock in the wee hours of the last decade. Touches of Billy Talent, the ambitions of Good Charlotte, and even the alt-rock, radio-drive like-mindedness of any given post-grunge, sore-throat belcher band known to plant numero diez positions with their singles on the mainstream charts flowed through cuts such as “He Said, She Said” and “Bomb Hands”. Too bad the singles largely went through their rotation unheard – in all honesty, they really shouldn’t have. Fast forward to circa post-Nickelback and Hinder headache that is 2010, and we find this quintet from Canada returning to the days of the 80s – a time when radio rock charted a little higher and was taken a little more seriously. From a commercial standpoint, whether that proves to be the case for this band’s Rock 'N’ Roll is yet to be seen - I doubt it - but as far as quality goes we’ve certainly heard better – thirty years ago, too.

Social Code begins Rock 'N’ Roll with its title track, an acoustic ballad that has Travis Nesbitt declaring his love for the art in question in very much the same way a young teeny bopper might confess his or her affections to a sweet heart. From there, it’s a trip through the days of Reaganomics. Anything from the tactics of love ala Aerosmith in the face-first rocker “Satisfied” and the slower-verse-passionate-chorus structure of “Real Girl” to the water-drop harmonics of “Perfect Grave” brings back memories of sporting mullets and leather jackets while driving your rich stepdad’s Magnum PI. Influence wise, Social Code certainly play their cards well, being sure to properly make known who they plagiarized each idea from after the first ten seconds of each track.

The problems with Rock 'N’ Roll come in how washed-out everything feels on here. It’s like playing any given current modern rock hit over and over: it’s bound to get tiresome, whether after just five plays or thirty, but the problem here is that the tracks get tiresome after just one play; the hooks are blatant and obvious, yet they have very hardly any ability whatsoever to effectively wind around anyone’s head. “Stay” plays the pleading boy for girl thing, starting on a minimal verse before a drum throws us into the chorus. As this track demonstrates – actually, they all do - Travis Nesbitt’s sentiments seem formulaic and starved, merely filling in the calculated melodies with reasonable lyrics to fit the kind of thing these guys are going for; i.e., girls, typical life problems – going nowhere, girls, etc - and, of course, rock n’ roll. The album is a fond reminder of those days now thirty years gone – well, to those that want to remember it anyway – but the music here is dry, formulaic, and, in essence, as dead as the skull on the cover.



Recent reviews by this author
exm CompBillain Lands Unbreached
Exm | Mitoma e|mInanna Transfigured in a Thousand Delusions
Burden of Life The Makeshift ConquerorDisillusion The Liberation
user ratings (4)
2.5
average


Comments:Add a Comment 
BigHans
March 24th 2010


30959 Comments


If this sounds like the 80's I would probably love it. Magnum PI ftw.

Observer
Emeritus
March 24th 2010


9393 Comments


The influence is there, but its more like a bad hinder take on that decade

Romulus
March 24th 2010


9109 Comments


We know how much I like Hinder so I would obviously love this.

Observer
Emeritus
March 24th 2010


9393 Comments


Definitely classic material for you, rom.

Apparently mike already rated this. I hope I didn't steal his review or something

Metalstyles
March 24th 2010


8576 Comments


fun review, although it reads more like a 2

Also, sorry to be a nitpick, but

From their it’s a trip through the days of Reaganomics; anything from the tactics of love ala Aerosmith in the face-first rocker “Satisfied” and the slower-verse-passionate-chorus structure of “Real Girl” to the water-drop harmonics of “Perfect Grave” brings back memories of sporting mullets and leather jackets, driving your rich stepdad’s Magnum PI, while picking up the lasses with the short hair cuts – or incredibly frizzled puffs.
this reads a bit awkward in parts, and would maybe work better if broken into 2 parts as it's awful long atm. Still, great review though

Observer
Emeritus
March 24th 2010


9393 Comments


Yeah, i agree. Got a little carried away there. I'll edit.

edit: hope that works better.

Metalstyles
March 24th 2010


8576 Comments


Yeah much better. Oh the wonders a few added words and a full-stop can do hahaha. Pos

EVedder27
March 24th 2010


6088 Comments


Dammit I was gonna do this! I may still, but great review Jared and I agree. Everything about this is truly awful, and I couldn't help but think of Hinder while I was listening.

Mikesn
Emeritus
March 24th 2010


3707 Comments


All I know is that the title track is terrible.

Observer
Emeritus
March 24th 2010


9393 Comments


Yeah, I saw your rating after writing mine and was worried I would take it. Thanks btw, guys.

Yeah the title track is an odd one, both in placement on the album and just the way its written. It's hard to take seriously.

Crysis
Emeritus
March 25th 2010


17624 Comments


Sounds like shit.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy