Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-31-2006, 12:10 PM   #1
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
American Immigration Reform

Blah blah blah another thread about illegal immigration. If you don't want to discuss it, don't post in here.

There has been a lot of discussion about the morality of immigration reform in the US, but not a lot of proposed solutions to improve the current situation. Obviously there isn't much support for building a Berlin wall between the United States and Mexico, and support for the increased military presence on the border seems to be up in the air as well.

Personally, I think that enforcing immigration laws at this stage of the game will do nothing but instigate a conflict between the United States and Mexican governments, but that may just be the best thing for our country at this point. A major concern in removing illegal immigrants from our soil is the impact it will have on the economy and the fact that it's heavily protested by the legal/illegal Mexican community at large.

However, another militaristic conflict between the United States and Mexico, while seemingly unrealistic, has been long coming. I personally think that we should go all in with our plans for increased border aggression and if they want to fight back, then so be it. It would be beneficial to our economy and, if a territorial dispute were added to the conflict, we could greatly improve the living conditions south of the border to eliminate the need for Mexicans to jump the border into the US.

ITT: Discuss your own ideas for the best method of immigration reform and how you would like to see them applied.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 12:28 PM   #2
lfantwister
dr chim richolds
 
lfantwister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,545
It's really important that we don't grant illegals that are already here amnesty. For one thing, that would just be a greater incentive for more to move to the US. But more importantly they are our source of cheap, under the table, labor which helps to make goods more competiively priced.

Quote:
However, another militaristic conflict between the United States and Mexico, while seemingly unrealistic, has been long coming. I personally think that we should go all in with our plans for increased border aggression and if they want to fight back, then so be it. It would be beneficial to our economy and, if a territorial dispute were added to the conflict, we could greatly improve the living conditions south of the border to eliminate the need for Mexicans to jump the border into the US.
I think it would be a lot harder to do that than it looks. We'd need a helluva lot more troops, and a lot more money to back up this plan. So maybe it should wait a little while. We've seen how hard it is to rebuild Iraq--it will be really hard to build Mexico (if thats what youre suggesting, im not sure).

I don't understand why we would want to annex or rebuild Mexico or whatever. What do they have that we want? It would really be a waste of money and supplies etc. It's like picking on the weak corrupt neighbor just for the hell of it. Which usually I wouldnt object to too much except that theres really no clearcut benefit for us.
lfantwister is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 01:01 PM   #3
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by lfantwister
It's really important that we don't grant illegals that are already here amnesty. For one thing, that would just be a greater incentive for more to move to the US. But more importantly they are our source of cheap, under the table, labor which helps to make goods more competiively priced.
Then we need economic reform as well. It's disheartening to think that the crutch of our economy is illegal immigrant labor.

Quote:
I think it would be a lot harder to do that than it looks. We'd need a helluva lot more troops, and a lot more money to back up this plan. So maybe it should wait a little while. We've seen how hard it is to rebuild Iraq--it will be really hard to build Mexico (if thats what youre suggesting, im not sure).
I'm suggesting more of a renovation than a rebuilding. The Mexican president doesn't give two shits about his own country and that's the core of the reason for illegal immigration's very existence. A militaristic conflict would force him to unite his willingly divided country and, in the aftermath, maintain the unity to prevent future aggression.

Quote:
I don't understand why we would want to annex or rebuild Mexico or whatever. What do they have that we want? It would really be a waste of money and supplies etc. It's like picking on the weak corrupt neighbor just for the hell of it. Which usually I wouldnt object to too much except that theres really no clearcut benefit for us.
The benefit is the fact that by seperating ourselves from this dependency on foreign labor, we'd shift towards a more independent economy. Also, not to stereotype, but it would have a major impact on the level of gang related violence in latino weighted communities.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 01:54 PM   #4
The Real El Capitano
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: I forgot my real join date but it was circa 2004
Posts: 1,043
A river of gasoline on fire. Then people like me that live an hour and a half from the border can go down and have a pic-nic and watch all the Mexicans try to jump through it.

O, and I'm down with the military conflict idea. Also, I'm tired of people saying "Immigrant Rights" and stuff, when they fail to realizse that THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS. THEY ARE NOT TAX PAYING CITIZENS THEREFORE THEIR VOICE HAS NO SWAY IN OUR COUNCIL.
The Real El Capitano is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 01:59 PM   #5
Danish
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real El Capitano
A river of gasoline on fire. Then people like me that live an hour and a half from the border can go down and have a pic-nic and watch all the Mexicans try to jump through it.

O, and I'm down with the military conflict idea. Also, I'm tired of people saying "Immigrant Rights" and stuff, when they fail to realizse that THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS. THEY ARE NOT TAX PAYING CITIZENS THEREFORE THEIR VOICE HAS NO SWAY IN OUR COUNCIL.
People have rights simply by virtue of being people.
Danish is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:00 PM   #6
Otherside
wut
 
Otherside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oic
Posts: 7,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real El Capitano
THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS. THEY ARE NOT TAX PAYING CITIZENS THEREFORE THEIR VOICE HAS NO SWAY IN OUR COUNCIL.
If you really think that they pay no taxes than you are one of the more idiotic posters around, and that's saying something.
Otherside is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:16 PM   #7
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danish
People have rights simply by virtue of being people.
US constitutional rights are reserved for legal US citizens.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:32 PM   #8
Danish
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iscariot
US constitutional rights are reserved for legal US citizens.
UN Charter of Human Rights.
Danish is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:33 PM   #9
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spat Out Plath
You need welfare reform, not immigration reform.
We need America reform.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danish
UN Charter of Human Rights.
Territorial jurisdiction.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:34 PM   #10
Otherside
wut
 
Otherside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oic
Posts: 7,313
That's true, but immigration is certainly not near the top of that reform list.
Otherside is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:41 PM   #11
DBoons Ghost
Banned
 
DBoons Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,561
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

Yeah right.

These words are what makes America great. I should say, these words made America great. Now?

I suppose one could blame the falsehoods surrounding the "American Dream" for what they now deem a problem. It's not immigration. It's the bureacracy surrounding it. All of a sudden what's good for the Goose is no longer good for the Gander.

Americans are the world's dregs turned into greedy monsters who would choose isolationism over creating the world our forefathers dreamed of. Even that's a lie. We are the poor tired huddlesd masses.. We've always been. My grandparents struggled with citizenship same as anyone. I stand by the sides of those immigrants who are now being scorn for trying to find a better life.

Rant maybe. I don't have answers. It makes me sick though.
DBoons Ghost is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:44 PM   #12
SubtleDagger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
America's always had problems, even in its inception. Of course, they didn't show through as much in the beginning because the founding fathers were more passionate abou their principles, but they've always been there. We've never been an even near-perfect country.

Just in response to the contrast in immigration views over time.
 
Old 05-31-2006, 02:45 PM   #13
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBoon's Ghost
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

Yeah right.

These words are what makes America great. I should say, these words made America great. Now?

I suppose one could blame the falsehoods surrounding the "American Dream" for what they now deem a problem. It's not immigration. It's the bureacracy surrounding it. All of a sudden what's good for the Goose is no longer good for the Gander.

Americans are the world's dregs turned into greedy monsters who would choose isolationism over creating the world our forefathers dreamed of. Even that's a lie. We are the poor tired huddlesd masses.. We've always been. My grandparents struggled with citizenship same as anyone. I stand by the sides of those immigrants who are now being scorn for trying to find a better life.

Rant maybe. I don't have answers. It makes me sick though.
There is a big, BIG difference between legal immigrants and freeloaders. Your grandparents didn't come to this country with the idea that they would sneak in, have a few kids and then stay for the long haul without ever earning their citizenship. Those Mexicans that come to the US illegally aren't making a better life for themselves. They're sticking to low-income, Mexican communities, they aren't learning how to speak English and they're leeching off the welfare system to survive. They aren't going out and even attempting to earn their citizenship and then when they're told to go home, they throw a temper tantrum. Defend them all you want, but your views are a little convoluted on this issue.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:45 PM   #14
Danish
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iscariot
Territorial jurisdiction.
I realize that the UN doesn't have the ability to enforce, well, anything.

I was responding to a post where the poster implied that illegal immigrants are unworthy of the rights that official citizens enjoy. What I was getting at is that rights are more than what was written on a piece of paper 200 years ago. The spirit of human rights theory is that all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, political stripe, gender, and sexual orientation, are people who deserve basic rights simply by virtue of being people, not necessarily citizens. Perhaps it doesn't work like that in reality, but it ought to. The concept of universal human rights should be brought into the discourse on immigration, but it doesn't. The media is very quick to paint illegal immigrants as "the other", something less than an "American."
Danish is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:47 PM   #15
SubtleDagger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danish
I realize that the UN doesn't have the ability to enforce, well, anything.

I was responding to a post where the poster implied that illegal immigrants are unworthy of the rights that official citizens enjoy. What I was getting at is that rights are more than what was written on a piece of paper 200 years ago. The spirit of human rights theory is that all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, political stripe, gender, and sexual orientation, are people who deserve basic rights simply by virtue of being people, not necessarily citizens. Perhaps it doesn't work like that in reality, but it ought to. The concept of universal human rights should be brought into the discourse on immigration, but it doesn't. The media is very quick to paint illegal immigrants as "the other", something less than an "American."
I agree with this to some extent.

Why should Americans have any more given rights than the rest of the world? They are no better or worse as people.
 
Old 05-31-2006, 02:47 PM   #16
Danish
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iscariot
There is a big, BIG difference between legal immigrants and freeloaders. Your grandparents didn't come to this country with the idea that they would sneak in, have a few kids and then stay for the long haul without ever earning their citizenship. Those Mexicans that come to the US illegally aren't making a better life for themselves. They're sticking to low-income, Mexican communities, they aren't learning how to speak English and they're leeching off the welfare system to survive. They aren't going out and even attempting to earn their citizenship and then when they're told to go home, they throw a temper tantrum. Defend them all you want, but your views are a little convoluted on this issue.
PROVE IT, ethnocentrist!
Danish is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:47 PM   #17
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danish
I realize that the UN doesn't have the ability to enforce, well, anything.

I was responding to a post where the poster implied that illegal immigrants are unworthy of the rights that official citizens enjoy. What I was getting at is that rights are more than what was written on a piece of paper 200 years ago. The spirit of human rights theory is that all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, political stripe, gender, and sexual orientation, are people who deserve basic rights simply by virtue of being people, not necessarily citizens. Perhaps it doesn't work like that in reality, but it ought to. The concept of universal human rights should be brought into the discourse on immigration, but it doesn't. The media is very quick to paint illegal immigrants as "the other", something less than an "American."
I won't disagree with you on the topic of that being a good idea in theory, but when you throw in economics, crime, distribution of labor, etc.. it can never be applied.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danish
ethnocentrist!
Where in my entire discussion have I shown any ethnocentricism? I don't have any problem with Mexicans if they're legal and willing to integrate to the country they chose to move to.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:48 PM   #18
The Peaceful Warrior
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubtleDagger
I agree with this to some extent.

Why should Americans have any more given rights than the rest of the world? They are no better or worse as people.
We're not better than islamic extemists???
The Peaceful Warrior is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:48 PM   #19
Danish
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBoon's Ghost
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

Yeah right.

These words are what makes America great. I should say, these words made America great. Now?

I suppose one could blame the falsehoods surrounding the "American Dream" for what they now deem a problem. It's not immigration. It's the bureacracy surrounding it. All of a sudden what's good for the Goose is no longer good for the Gander.

Americans are the world's dregs turned into greedy monsters who would choose isolationism over creating the world our forefathers dreamed of. Even that's a lie. We are the poor tired huddlesd masses.. We've always been. My grandparents struggled with citizenship same as anyone. I stand by the sides of those immigrants who are now being scorn for trying to find a better life.

Rant maybe. I don't have answers. It makes me sick though.
I think the moons ARE aligned with Venus, because, believe it or not, I couldn't agree with you more.

I'd just like to add that immigrants' struggles are workers' struggles.
Danish is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:50 PM   #20
SubtleDagger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Peaceful Warrior
We're not better than islamic extemists???
No, we just disagree.

It's that type of thinking that leads to ignorance.
 
Old 05-31-2006, 02:50 PM   #21
Danish
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iscariot
I won't disagree with you on the topic of that being a good idea in theory, but when you throw in economics, crime, distribution of labor, etc.. it can never be applied.
Of course not! Capitalism gives no room for any considerations other than growing profits and maintaining power structures. Instead of solidarity with your fellow workers that happen to be Mexican in origin, you're in favour of making their extremely difficult lives even harder. Have you ever asked yourself why?

If we actually cared about the well-being of humanity, immigration wouldn't even be an issue.
Danish is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:51 PM   #22
Steve Buscemi
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubtleDagger
No, we just disagree.

It's that type of thinking that leads to ignorance.
But would'nt you say that anyone whose objective revolves around the extermination of others' free will is say, less?
Steve Buscemi is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:52 PM   #23
SubtleDagger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Buscemi
But would'nt you say that anyone whose objective revolves around the extermination of others' free will is say, less?
Less what?

I don't understand what you're asking.
 
Old 05-31-2006, 02:54 PM   #24
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubtleDagger
Less what?

I don't understand what you're asking.
He's asking if you honestly believe that someone in say, the US or the UK (just examples) is equal to a member of a totalitarian extremist organization who's only goal is to eradicate the 'infidels' at any cost.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:55 PM   #25
Otherside
wut
 
Otherside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oic
Posts: 7,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iscariot
He's asking if you honestly believe that someone in say, the US or the UK (just examples) is equal to a member of a totalitarian extremist organization who's only goal is to eradicate the 'infidels' at any cost.
Or that if someone with opposing views to the 'cities on the hills" are worse people because they don't agree with us.


I seriously find it to be a conflicting question.
Otherside is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:56 PM   #26
Danish
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iscariot
He's asking if you honestly believe that someone in say, the US or the UK (just examples) is equal to a member of a totalitarian extremist organization who's only goal is to eradicate the 'infidels' at any cost.
I think you need to take a course in International Relations.
Danish is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:56 PM   #27
Iscariot
Team Edward
 
Iscariot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 41,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otherside
Or that if someone with opposing views to the 'cities on the hills" are worse people because they don't agree with us.


I seriously find it to be a conflicting question.
So do I, actually.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danish
I think you need to take a course in International Relations.
I think you need to take a course in reality.
Iscariot is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:57 PM   #28
Steve Buscemi
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubtleDagger
Less what?

I don't understand what you're asking.
Undeserving of equal rights.
Steve Buscemi is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:57 PM   #29
Otherside
wut
 
Otherside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oic
Posts: 7,313
No not until they've done some kind of crime. They can think whatever they want, and it's none of our business tbqh.
Otherside is offline  
Old 05-31-2006, 02:58 PM   #30
SubtleDagger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iscariot
He's asking if you honestly believe that someone in say, the US or the UK (just examples) is equal to a member of a totalitarian extremist organization who's only goal is to eradicate the 'infidels' at any cost.
In essence, yes. As I said, both groups have conflicting interests, but both at least deserve the simplest of human rights in my opinion. Regardless of their beliefs they are still the same as human beings.

I am for the most part a pacifist though; I believe in self-defense to some extent, but this is all my perspective here.
 
 


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 PM.