Entertaining filler sounds pretty accurate to me. It just lacked the flow and the charm of the first one.

I agree that the second Pirates wasn't as good as the first but who gives a sh[size=2]it[/size]? Not me.

I loved the second one. The story was alot cooler and the subplots kept it interesting throughout the film. Plus I could go gay for Johnny Depp.

I got really good Who tickets.

Superman > Pirates

Additionally, I'd like to kill anyone who is "hyped" for Snakes on a Plane.

[QUOTE=cb240]Superman > Pirates

Additionally, I'd like to kill anyone who is "hyped" for Snakes on a Plane.[/QUOTE]
but why? The movie is going to be good.

About as entertaining as a 90 minute internet meme can be. If that's entertaining to you then, well, you're lame.

snakes on a plane...ooooh

It could be the start of a new trend of movies, which is to make them bad on purpose so people will pay money to watch them ironically.

Man that would suck. But I still think there's hope for a new genre of movies: the super-satire. It's not filled with jokes like the now-outdated satire movies (the Wayans brothers pretty much killed them off), but just really really cliched so that it's funny. I think it could work and maybe SOAP is the start of it.

[QUOTE=YDload]It could be the start of a new trend of movies, which is to make them bad on purpose so people will pay money to watch them ironically.

Man that would suck. But I still think there's hope for a new genre of movies: the super-satire. It's not filled with jokes like the now-outdated satire movies (the Wayans brothers pretty much killed them off), but just really really cliched so that it's funny. I think it could work and maybe SOAP is the start of it.[/QUOTE]

whatever...[I]Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood [/I]invented movies.





:lol:






no but seriously, I like that movie.

[QUOTE=cb240]Superman > Pirates

Additionally, I'd like to kill anyone who is "hyped" for Snakes on a Plane.[/QUOTE]

I'm not so much "hyped" so to speak as I am filled with a type of morbid curiousity.

And the Wayans brothers suck balls.

agreed


...with both of the above two posts


except the bit about Snakes on a Plane because I have no freaking idea what the hell it is.

[QUOTE=Little Man being Erased]except the bit about Snakes on a Plane because I have no freaking idea what the hell it is.[/QUOTE]

It's about this crime witness guy who has to fly across the country to testify in a trial, and Samuel L. Jackson has to protect him. To complicate matters, the guy trying to kill the witness sets loose.....






....wait for it.....






SNAKES ON A PLANE

and its become this huge internet sensation in the past six months or so.

[QUOTE=Dimes Make Dollars][I]Little Man[/i] looks like the worst piece of sh[size=2]i[/size]t movie ever concieved

"lol he is a midget pretending to be a baby lol breastfeeding with hilarious results"[/QUOTE]

I think it looks better than a lot of the s[COLOR="White"]h[/COLOR]it comedies out lately. But I think short people are hilarious.

It's missing Adam Sandler.

hmmm, sounds like one huge drawn out joke.

While We're on the subject I reckon alot of Modern Horror movies suck. They're all about satan and children being drowned and or having a rough time at elementary school due to their affilctations with the devil.

Besides they aren't even scary. They just cheat you with a bunch of quiet scenes where they come out and go "BOOOGY BOOGY BOOOOOO!"

I felt cheated at the remake of The Omen.

Scary movies do not scare me. I generally end up laughing when I see them.

But I say the unrated version of "The Hills Have Eyes" and was quite pissed off with it. It wasn't scary, it made me mad. Such horrible and graphic things happend that, espcially with the group of people I was with, I really didn't need to see. It wasn't what I was expecting and it sucked.

Yeah I agree with that. The exceptions being the two Saw films. While they weren't fantastic, they were fairly original and interesting. As well as being exceedingly sickening.

[QUOTE=Little Man being Erased]Yeah I agree with that. The exceptions being the two Saw films. While they weren't fantastic, they were fairly original and interesting. As well as being exceedingly sickening.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I did like those movies. After the last few unmemorable scary movies I've seen, though, I knew to not bother with the remake of the omen.

It's crazy how many remakes come out these days.

Actually, now that you mention remakes, I thought [I]The Ring[/I] was excellent.

Actually I'm a huge fan of The Ring. I like movies with atmosphere and creepiness as apossed to big loud noises and blood. Like an Eraserhead vibe.

talledega nights.....etc


I wanna see that just because I can laugh at Will Ferrell notstop....he's just a funny funny guy in my eyes.

I did like the ring when it first came out.

And Eraserhead. Crazy film.

[QUOTE=Dimes Make Dollars]Yeah the Saw movies might not have been actually scary but they were definitely the creepiest movies I've seen in a long time.[/QUOTE]
Yeah.

Girl getting thrown into pit of used needles = vomit inducing.

Will Ferrell rules.

Eww, Will Ferrell.

More like Will Feral.

Usually I can't stand Will Ferrell, but he's ok in small doses. The main reason I liked Anchorman was because Steve Carrell was in it, and he's fricking hilarious. And Anchorman is hilarious too.

[QUOTE=Well_Respected_Man]While We're on the subject I reckon alot of Modern Horror movies suck. They're all about satan and children being drowned and or having a rough time at elementary school due to their affilctations with the devil.

Besides they aren't even scary. They just cheat you with a bunch of quiet scenes where they come out and go "BOOOGY BOOGY BOOOOOO!"

I felt cheated at the remake of The Omen.[/QUOTE]

Pretty much all modern horror films suck. 'Cept Shaun Of The Dead :cool:

How could I have forgotten about [I]Shaun of the Dead[/I]?


And Will Ferrell is hilarious in [I]Anchorman[/I] and several other movies he's been in.