[QUOTE=Rollo47]Hmm. Quick replies are working for me now. A slight improvement. Still a pile of crap, though. If it stays this format, I will leave.[/QUOTE]

Slightly melodramatic, don't you think? I prefer the old one too, but it's not THAT bad.

It's the same reason why I quit posting at TB, really.

[quote=Wintermute]Slightly melodramatic, don't you think? I prefer the old one too, but it's not THAT bad.[/quote]

It's bad enough to make me want to stop posting. Seriously.

[QUOTE=FunkMetalBass]It's bad enough to make me want to stop posting. Seriously.[/QUOTE]
123.
EDIT: GOD DAMM.IT! THEY MAKE YOU HAVE 10 LETTERS NOW!!!!

[quote=Worrpigs]123.
EDIT: GOD DAMM.IT! THEY MAKE YOU HAVE 10 LETTERS NOW!!!![/quote]

0123456789

Fuc.kin A! This Format Sucks!!!!!

[QUOTE=Worrpigs]123.
EDIT: GOD DAMM.IT! THEY MAKE YOU HAVE 10 LETTERS NOW!!!![/QUOTE]


:lol: That, at least, I approve of.

Right. I'm off. I may see you tomorrow. Maybe.

[quote=Wintermute]:lol: That, at least, I approve of.[/quote]

Seeing as I never abused the 3 letter policy, I feel as though I've had my rights infringed upon.

[QUOTE=FunkMetalBass]Seeing as I never abused the 3 letter policy, I feel as though I've had my rights infringed upon.[/QUOTE]
the lowest amount of letters i have in any of my posts was 123. this format sucks

I just noticed that there is also a problem with the lessons and articles. It says there are threads there, but when I enter, there is nothing.

Now that IS melodramatic.

Does it really matter that much that you now have to actually say something, if you never abused the three letter policy? If anything, it affects you least of all. The only people who have anything to complain about here are people who DID abuse it.

the format isnt that bad....geez.

[quote=Wintermute]Now that IS melodramatic.

Does it really matter that much that you now have to actually say something, if you never abused the three letter policy? If anything, it affects you least of all. The only people who have anything to complain about here are people who DID abuse it.[/quote]

I was intentionally being melodramatic. I wasn't complaining about it at all. It doesn't bother me.

Internet forums aren't the best place to show sarcasm.

[QUOTE=FunkMetalBass]I was intentionally being melodramatic. I wasn't complaining about it at all. It doesn't bother me.

Internet forums aren't the best place to show sarcasm.[/QUOTE]
you mean you dont have the sarcasm font on your computer?

[quote=Worrpigs]you mean you dont have the sarcasm font on your computer?[/quote]

Microsoft was down when I tried to download it. :upset:

im out. im disapointed mx :upset:

I'm out too, except it's because I have errands to run before work.

PeacE OuT!

Hui-ui-ui, new layout. I was wondering why mx was down a couple of hours ago. I kinda like it, it looks less cluttered to me.

I wish they'd actually remove signatures again...

I think it's harder to manouver, but I guess you get used to it.. It's harder to spam atleast :thumb:

This new layout's really throwing me off. Why can't I post in the thing at the bottom? Ugh I'm confused and lost!:confused:

Yeah, it's irritating.. But I guess a good thing is that you can see the location of members!

The new quick reply system is utterly redundant - don't expect that to be around for long.


Don't get too worked up about any of the changes just yet - this as a period of experimentation. Things that don't work / aren't popular won't be kept.

I'm used to having to click the quick reply button from TB. Now there's finally some consistency between my 2 favourite forums.

The quick reply button means its hardly any more convenient than the advanced reply.

True, it took some getting used to over at TB but now that I am I sometimes clicked it here as well. Convenient it ain't, though.

Location: Prifysgol Morgannwg eh?

Let's see if the signature works for me..

No, it's not working, anyone knows why?

you should be able to choose what format you want on your computer and your computer only.