Lynard skynard would have been huge. Like super huge like jimundo massively huge. But they=teh diezorz so yeah :(

[QUOTE=DVG]Oh yea, and Jeremy Colson was the drummer on the night.

About Jet bringing back classic rock... they arnt really. If any thing the Darkness is, more so then Jet. If only they wernt taken for comical value so much and put out a BIT more serious stuff.

Country. *Snicker* *Thinks of Dolly Parton*

Nah, Bob Dylan is t3h sh1t.

DVG.[/QUOTE]

We've been over this. If anything now is bringing back Classic Rock, it's Gov't Mule.

[QUOTE=rock not rolled]Lynard skynard would have been huge. Like super huge like jimundo massively huge. But they=teh diezorz so yeah :([/QUOTE]

Yea they never got the respect they deserved.

Wow, I'm surprised nobody mentions the people that influenced the beatles, and Clapton, and Zeppelin. What about Buddy Holly? He was frickin' awesome! And Chuck Berry too. You want some good classic rock, listen to their recordings

My favorites:

Pink floyd
Jimi Hendrix
Santana
Led Zeppelin
Black Sabbath

Does anybody else agree that Bob Dylan is the god of 20th century rock?

God is the God of 21st century rock.

ac\dc sucks. led zeppelin sucks. the beatles especially suck and were the backstreet boys of the 60s and 70s. the only good 'classic' rock is Neil young and rush..and maybe boston. dylan aint to bad either...

[QUOTE=Jude]Does anybody else agree that Bob Dylan is the god of 20th century rock?[/QUOTE]

i agree that he is a god. i wouldn't say that he was the GOD. I think the God was the Holy Fabulous Four, aka THE BEATLES. No1 compared to the Beatles.

[QUOTE=SkaRobotArmy]ac\dc sucks. led zeppelin sucks. the beatles especially suck and were the backstreet boys of the 60s and 70s. the only good 'classic' rock is Neil young and rush..and maybe boston. dylan aint to bad either...[/QUOTE]

you my friend have no idea what you are talking about if you are comparing the backstreet boys to the beatles. First off, the beatles weren't put together by producers. They wrote their own material, and they expressed themselves creatively. They played in far more styles than just teenie bop like the backstreet boys. o yea and the beatles had talent. led zeppelin is also quite far from sucking but i'm too tired to argue with someone who's opinions are as misguided as yours...

Yeah I guess Bob dylan would be god. Him or Hendrix.

[QUOTE=B0nz0]i agree that he is a god. i wouldn't say that he was the GOD. I think the God was the Holy Fabulous Four, aka THE BEATLES. No1 compared to the Beatles.[/QUOTE]


FLoyd son

The beatles were amazing. While not having the most skill at their instruments as other bands they managed to be the most popular band in the history of popular music. Plus their songs make me happy :)

their songs make me hit things.

they were bad musicians who made boring music. hendrix isnt very good either, maybe a good guitarist but i dont like his music.

[QUOTE=SkaRobotArmy]they were bad musicians who made boring music. hendrix isnt very good either, maybe a good guitarist but i dont like his music.[/QUOTE]

Maybe because your name is [b]Ska[/b]RobotArmy?

Yes because there is waaaay more talent in ska than Jimi hendrix had... :rolleyes:. And the beatles were simple but good. :thumb:

but people praise them for the amazing musicianship and all that but they werent very good. i said jimi hendrix was talented, not as talent as everyone says but thats not the point. and dont judge me because i like ska, i like plenty of other music too if you read more than just my last post.

right then.

banned again?

[QUOTE=magicbus]banned again?[/QUOTE]

You know it. Don't worry i'll be back to normal in 2 days.

rgr

Pink Floyd Is Awesome

[QUOTE=blinksydandsum]Pink Floyd Is Awesome[/QUOTE]


indeed they are

Hmm, comparing the Backstreet Boys to The Beatles.

Take a look at the cover to Millenium, then look at the cover to Abbey Road. Very similar indeed.

Oh boy.

The Beatles wrote the best songs of all time. Well, I think Lennon wrote the best songs of all time, but thats beside the point. I don't see how you say they suck. Yeah, they weren't the best musicians, but if you judge songs by plain talent alone, go listen to some Mozart or something else. Jesus.

im not. i like plenty of $hit musicians but people say they were the BEST musicians ever, and completely believe it, its ridiculous they are way over rated. they did not write the best songs of all time. there is one or two songs i can listen to and not want to hurt small creatures. they're music is dull, gutless and boring.

[QUOTE=SkaRobotArmy]im not. i like plenty of $hit musicians but people say they were the BEST musicians ever, and completely believe it, its ridiculous they are way over rated. they did not write the best songs of all time. there is one or two songs i can listen to and not want to hurt small creatures. they're music is dull, gutless and boring.[/QUOTE]

Maybe its teh drugzors.

As musicians they were underrated. Of course they had their overrated moments. But here, on most of Paul McCartney's solo albums, he played each instrument, and did it well. George Harrsion played 46 instruments well, and pretty much introduced the sitar to Rock. John Lennon was quite a good piano player. And Ringo set the path for millions of up and coming drummers. He kept a good rythm and played with a now very common style, which was rarely, if never seen then.

[QUOTE=rock not roll]Yep. Then again so is Good Charlotte :(. Some teenagers are more cool than others I guess.[/QUOTE]
Amen. :rolleyes:

[QUOTE=SkaRobotArmy]they were bad musicians who made boring music. hendrix isnt very good either, maybe a good guitarist but i dont like his music.[/QUOTE]
Then you must DIE. Why do you bother flaming Hendrix.... It won't go over very ****ing well. :evil: