[QUOTE=RetiredAt21;17413694]those shirts are tacky sry :[[/QUOTE]

You don't like them cause they aren't black and white with some kind of satantic detail on it.

[QUOTE=Dimmu Burger;17413670]that may be my favorite actually.[/QUOTE]

You don't like it more than your pig destroyer one, cause then we might have a problem.

I do like my satanic black n white shirts def.

der devil is in der detail

they really are tacky :/

Not really mang.

a bit

[IMG]http://rlv.zcache.com/who_cares_smiley_t_shirt-p235626325520994391q6vb_400.jpg[/IMG]

Dumb shirt.

o snap

listening to curl up and die, forgot how good they are

They're OK.

i dont know theyre pretty elite

just bought the architects cd 'ruin'
havent listened to it before but im seeing them in sept. and it was $2

are they any good?

[QUOTE=dantesfire10;17415351]just bought the architects cd 'ruin'
havent listened to it before but im seeing them in sept. and it was $2

are they any good?[/QUOTE]

Old stuff is awesome... try Nightmares too. New album is pretty good.

i still havent heard the new album.
nightmares is my favorite album.
i dont like the vocals on ruin anwhere near as much

You'll porbably hate the new one then... the vocalist blew out his voice. Or is just screaming shitty now... it's really throaty vocals now.

The vocals on Ruin are absurd.

i still liked both cds
the first just owned the second

so ruin is good?

Ruin is badass. Vocals sound like a better version of Spencer from Underoath (that's saying A LOT).

[QUOTE=iamtherobots;17415433]Ruin is badass. Vocals sound like a better version of Spencer from Underoath (that's saying A LOT).[/QUOTE]

not at all.
spencer owns this dude

False.

spencer has way more range, mi amigo.

Honestly, as much as I love Underoath, I don't think Spencer is anything special. I think the way his vocals mesh with Aarons is what makes them awesome, from a vocal perspective.

Spencer's vocals in This Runs Through are incredible. His vocals when he first joined Underoath were pretty absurd, he sounded like he could be in a band like Daughters or Destroyer Destroyer or some ****. He has a very very powerful mid range though. Mids are by far the most difficult technique to get down.
[QUOTE=TomTheOverlord;17415496]spencer has way more range, mi amigo.[/QUOTE]

Spencer's high range was pretty blown out by the time they recorded DTGL. I've found the vocals on Ruin and that album to be somewhat similar in style, however I definitely digged Sam's use of highs on that album a lot, where Spencer's are good on DTGL, they're not as good idk.

I think Matt was way better on Nightmares js

whats the difference between Underoath and Unearth, I always 4get.

I wholeheartedly disagree. Matt's vocals sound mad weak.

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17415528]whats the difference between Underoath and Unearth, I always 4get.[/QUOTE]

Unearth is more on the metal side of metalcore (solos) and Underoath is more on the core side.

[QUOTE]I wholeheartedly disagree. Matt's vocals sound mad weak.[/QUOTE]

I dunno Nightmares if my favorite Architects album (overall) so maybe I'm biased.

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17415528]whats the difference between Underoath and Unearth, I always 4get.[/QUOTE]

Underoath is post hardcore/experimental.

Unearth is metal.