[QUOTE=Permanent Solution]
Ok then...a kid with big boobs and a nice body. But her face is still like a kid. And her boobs are too big for her body.[/QUOTE]

No, she's pretty flat. Her bikini was falling off. Although I'm sure you'd like her better if her tits where so small they poked out her back a little bit.

Watch the video for proof.

You have such horrible tastes in women.

[QUOTE=Pazz]I hope you aren't hinting that the US did lots in WWI, because they didn't. They didn't join until later in the war. And Canada did a fair bit in the War. They were considered the best at raids.[/QUOTE]

No, he's hinting that canada didn't do anything.

That's because Canada's forces are better trained than ours are/where.

We just have a ****load more of them.

[QUOTE=Pazz]I hope you aren't hinting that the US did lots in WWI, because they didn't. They didn't join until later in the war. And Canada did a fair bit in the War. They were considered the best at raids.[/QUOTE]
When we studied WWI, I don't remember learning anything about Canada.

And, the US army did join the war late, but they had a major impact as soon as they joined.

Also, history is taught from an American perspective here, and you guys are likely to learn it from a Canadian perspective. So, you may be taught that Canada did a lot, while we aren't necessarily.

/leaves to watch American Idol

[QUOTE=Pazz]I hope you aren't hinting that the US did lots in WWI, because they didn't. They didn't join until later in the war. And Canada did a fair bit in the War. They were considered the best at raids.[/QUOTE]
I didnt even know america where in WW1.

And when it comes to armys, British is best trianed.

Theres a saying i know from my time in the air cadet things, british army are best trian, worst equiped.

Holla holla!

-Gav

[QUOTE=Mute Print]When we studied WWI, I don't remember learning anything about Canada.

And, the US army did join the war late, but they had a major impact as soon as they joined.

Also, history is taught from an American perspective here, and you guys are likely to learn it from a Canadian perspective. So, you may be taught that Canada did a lot, while we aren't necessarily.

/leaves to watch American Idol[/QUOTE]

The states did do a bit once they joined. They helped British and Canada capture Passchendaele.

The US did a lot considering the amount of time they were in the war.

I've never even heard of Passchendaele, though.

[QUOTE=Mute Print]The US did a lot considering the amount of time they were in the war.

I've never even heard of Passchendaele, though.[/QUOTE]
And i suppose you won the folklands war :p

1 thing i hate about americas and the wars, yes, you did a lot to stop the germans in both efforts, but good lord stfu about it, it realy does my head, hearing in about how you came in and saved the uk's arse, it does my nut in.

[QUOTE=Mute Print]The US did a lot considering the amount of time they were in the war.

I've never even heard of Passchendaele, though.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, the States provided ammo and guns for fighting troops.

[QUOTE=BridgeToSolace][url]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8504958144143274016&q=alizee[/url]

All the proof you need that she is beyond your silly concepts of "hot".[/QUOTE]
She's cuter there. But she needs a better hairstyle. She has great hair but that style is crap.
[QUOTE=Pazz]I hope you aren't hinting that the US did lots in WWI, because they didn't. They didn't join until later in the war. And Canada did a fair bit in the War. They were considered the best at raids.[/QUOTE]
The US didn't do very much, no. The biggest play in the end of the war was probably the Bolshevik revolution really. The biggest impact the US had was in the treaty of Versailles and the creation of the UN (essentially).

But that said I've still never heard of any of the Canadian exploits in WWI either.
[QUOTE=BridgeToSolace]No, she's pretty flat. Her bikini was falling off.

Watch the video for proof.

You have such horrible tastes in women.[/QUOTE]
oic...well that earns her a few points back :p

Meh. Different from yours =/= worse.
[QUOTE=Untitled]And i suppose you won the folklands war :p

1 thing i hate about americas and the wars, yes, you did a lot to stop the germans in both efforts, but good lord stfu about it, it realy does my head, hearing in about how you came in and saved the uk's arse, it does my nut in.[/QUOTE]
Meh, we saved France mroe than Britain really. Germany severly lost the BOB.

Sup Gav.

.........I'm gonna go.

>_>
<_<
>_>

-Gav

[QUOTE=Untitled]
Theres a saying i know from my time in the air cadet things, british army are best trian, worst equiped.[/QUOTE]

You must never had heard of the Chauchat, then.

[QUOTE=I0Play0Bass].........I'm gonna go.

>_>
<_<
>_>

-Gav[/QUOTE]
I said hi

:(

[QUOTE=BridgeToSolace]You must never had heard of the Chauchat, then.[/QUOTE]
No, nor do i care.

Dont give me crap about how well trian your army is, because if it was, we'd send troops over there, where as we get your troops sent here.

Our biggst downfall is the Sa80, worst gun ever.

[QUOTE=Permanent Solution]She's cuter there. But she needs a better hairstyle. She has great hair but that style is crap.[/quote]
Hair fetishes are so silly.

[QUOTE]Meh. Different from yours =/= worse.[/QUOTE]

Actually, different from mine = worse.

/watches America's Next Top Model.

Too bad there's only one really hot chick in this cycle. The asian chick is decent, too.

[QUOTE=Untitled]No, nor do i care.

Dont give me crap about how well trian your army is, because if it was, we'd send troops over there, where as we get your troops sent here.

Our biggst downfall is the Sa80, worst gun ever.[/QUOTE]
The US army is not very well trained. But we have the best technology and that compensates because our army is also huge.

[QUOTE=BridgeToSolace]Hair fetishes are so silly.

Actually, different from mine = worse.

/watches America's Next Top Model.

Too bad there's only one really hot chick in this cycle. The asian chick is decent, too.[/QUOTE]
Shush...it's not like I choose what I'm picky about :-\

Nay. You're not a god of women :)

EDIT: Double post, woo.

Time for a radio meeting.

[QUOTE=Permanent Solution]The US army is not very well trained. But we have the best technology and that compensates because our army is also huge.[/QUOTE]
Oh definatly.

Im not denying if we went into war with you, you'd own us good, even if we are best trianed.

But if it was eqaul troop numbers, and eqaul technology, we would have the edge.

Or it might be who can push the big red nuke button first.

[QUOTE=Permanent Solution]The US army is not very well trained. [B] But we have the best technology[/B] and that compensates because our army is also huge.[/QUOTE]

One word: Chauchat

Well, we HAD the best technologoy. We were just too stupid to use it, I spose.

[QUOTE=BridgeToSolace]One word: Chauchat

Well, we HAD the best technologoy. We were just too stupid to use it, I spose.[/QUOTE]
So, on the internet, that says its a ww1 french gun....

Also, if thats one section of the army, it dosnt count, im talking about as a whole, everything from the royle gaurds, to the SAS.

[QUOTE=Untitled]
Or it might be who can push the big red nuke button first.[/QUOTE]

If it was about nukes, then we'd win.

We have far more land. We could **** up your entire entire with one barrage.

You could hardly have enough nuclear weapon launchers to cover the entire united states.

[QUOTE=BridgeToSolace]If it was about nukes, then we'd win.

We have far more land. We could **** up your entire entire with one barrage.

You could hardly have enough nuclear weapon launchers to cover the entire united states.[/QUOTE]
We wouldnt have to nuke every last inch of your country to crippel it, just target places like washington, new york city, and other major political or fineancial citys. It would be whoever got them off first.

TBH, i dont actully know if we even have nukes, im presuming so.

So anyway...yeah...how's it going, guys?

-Gav

[QUOTE=Untitled]So, on the internet, that says its a ww1 french gun....

Also, if thats one section of the army, it dosnt count, im talking about as a whole, everything from the royle gaurds, to the SAS.[/QUOTE]

It was the worst gun of WWI.

"The Chauchat was built of a rather shoddy stamped metal construction and of such poor quality that oftentimes its parts were not interchangeable between guns, meaning that a new gun could not be assembled from the parts of two others."

It use an ammo clip that was OPEN ON THE SIDE. This was intented to make it so you could tell how much ammo you had left...but seriously...if you're spending your life in dirt trenches...how hard do you think would be to clog/jam them up? "It was sucha terrible ****ing idea.

US issued a ton of them to soldiers, because they were cheap.

We had the BAR at the time, which is infinatly superior in all ways. We didn't use it...because it was so god damn good that we didn't want it to fall into german hands...

[QUOTE=I0Play0Bass]So anyway...yeah...how's it going, guys?

-Gav[/QUOTE]
Hey.

Im feeling realy good about myself, for some reason, well i know why, but whatever.

:cool:

[QUOTE=BridgeToSolace]It was the worst gun of WWI.

"The Chauchat was built of a rather shoddy stamped metal construction and of such poor quality that oftentimes its parts were not interchangeable between guns, meaning that a new gun could not be assembled from the parts of two others."

It use an ammo clip that was OPEN ON THE SIDE. This was intented to make it so you could tell how much ammo you had left...but seriously...if you're spending your life in dirt trenches...how hard do you think would be to clog/jam them up? "It was sucha terrible ****ing idea.

US issued a ton of them to soldiers, because they were cheap.

We had the BAR at the time, which is infinatly superior in all ways. We didn't use it...because it was so god damn good that we didn't want it to fall into german hands...[/QUOTE]I see.

You have good weapons now, what do you use, the M4?

look at the SA80, its crap, i know, ive shot one, well, it wasnt full auto, but ive shot one.

Its awefull, they always jam, its so crap.

Mmm...spaghetti good

[QUOTE=Untitled]We wouldnt have to nuke every last inch of your country to crippel it, just target places like washington, new york city, and other major political or fineancial citys. It would be whoever got them off first.[/quote]

I'm saying that we could literally wipe out your entire country.

You could cripple our major and important cities, but we still have many many smaller towns that could still survive. Also, we have Hawaii, bitch.


[quote]TBH, i dont actully know if we even have nukes, im presuming so.[/QUOTE]

Every modern country probably does have at lost some nuclear power. It's just a matter of how honest you are about it.

[QUOTE=AZNGuitaristDude101]Mmm...spaghetti good[/QUOTE]

last time I had spaghetti was before a hockey game and my team won 5 - 0, it was like a month ago, \m/

[QUOTE=Untitled]
You have good weapons now, what do you use, the M4?[/quote]

All I know about weapons I know from the history channel, and they don't cover our current milatary that much.

Although I reaserched machine pistols and SMGs for fun a few days ago. I have no idea why.

[quote]look at the SA80, its crap, i know, ive shot one, well, it wasnt full auto, but ive shot one.

Its awefull, they always jam, its so crap.[/QUOTE]

Man, when are you in a situation where you're shooting an SA80?