[QUOTE=Distant Echoes]R&M thread been around half the time but is catching up rapidly with the # of Classic Rock post

thats our next goal[/QUOTE]
That could be reached easily.

We got over 2,000 posts in five days for crying out loud.

[url]http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=1830&genreid=10[/url]

just posted my Quadrophenia review on that new krazy site for reviews

I think it could be alot better, but made it from what i already knew from the album, no heavy research.

How do you edit too, I didnt put the picture on in the right format...

that cd review site kicks ***

[QUOTE=Badmoon]The Classic Rock Thread will always be the heart of the Rock & Metal board. We have had some good times in there that most of you missed.[/QUOTE]

I try to keep up in there, but theres usually bands i dont know about you guys talk about, so i dont make any spam or random remarks and let you guys go.

And the Classic Rock thread lacks what this thread has...post that require no thought once-so-ever. Possibly the whole reason this thread is so successful

But i love the clissic rock thread. I wouldnt of ever been a user here if it werent for that thread

[QUOTE=Badmoon]The Classic Rock Thread will always be the heart of the Rock & Metal board. We have had some good times in there that most of you missed.[/QUOTE]

too bad?

who has the most post in the whole thing

Im goin to bed...i got alot of sleep to catch up on

Make any comments you want on that review...im not so good at writing them, and theres probably some inaccurate info.

[QUOTE=Distant Echoes]Im goin to bed...i got alot of sleep to catch up on

Make any comments you want on that review...im not so good at writing them, and theres probably some inaccurate info.[/QUOTE]

night!

[QUOTE=Badmoon]The Classic Rock Thread will always be the heart of the Rock & Metal board. We have had some good times in there that most of you missed.[/QUOTE]
That's subjective to taste I think. It certainly is a good tread, a hive of information, with alot of great posters who know their stuff. But if you're not really interested in classic rock then it won't be of great importance.

Allo, first real time in this casual thread so...yeah.. :wave:

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]Allo, first real time in this casual thread so...yeah.. :wave:[/QUOTE]

welcome

[QUOTE=Distant Echoes]I try to keep up in there, but theres usually bands i dont know about you guys talk about, so i dont make any spam or random remarks and let you guys go.

And the Classic Rock thread lacks what this thread has...post that require no thought once-so-ever. Possibly the whole reason this thread is so successful

But i love the clissic rock thread. I wouldnt of ever been a user here if it werent for that thread[/QUOTE]
It's like that with the deathheads thread for me. I go in a lot, but they're usually discussing bands I don't know of. I'm not going to check every single one out either. Oh well.

never been there

Well, since Portugese football/soccer doesn't seem to be doing the trick, I think I'll head to bed to solve my boredom.

G'night people :wave:

[QUOTE=munky_magik]Well, since Portugese football/soccer doesn't seem to be doing the trick, I think I'll head to bed to solve my boredom.

G'night people :wave:[/QUOTE]

hes goin?

[QUOTE=munky_magik]Well, since Portugese football/soccer doesn't seem to be doing the trick, I think I'll head to bed to solve my boredom.

G'night people :wave:[/QUOTE]
later

[QUOTE=Badmoon]The Classic Rock Thread will always be the heart of the Rock & Metal board. We have had some good times in there that most of you missed.[/QUOTE]

The Classic Rock Thread will never be anything more to the R&M forum than the death heads thread; a fantastic font of knowledge about it's main subject, and a great discussion place for it's already knowledgeable users, but never the heart.

This thread will never be the heart either, though.

The Classic Rock thread is the reason I joined mx.

Well, of course it is only my opinion, but we get a very small percentage of posts in the Deathhead Thread, due to the people who believe it is for Deadheads :p. And we'll always have that :upset:

[QUOTE]place for it's already knowledgeable users, but never the heart.[/QUOTE]

Well then it's definitley the stomach.

Looks like this thread is pretty new in itself..

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]Looks like this thread is pretty new in itself..[/QUOTE]

2 weeks old?

[QUOTE=munky_magik]Well, since Portugese football/soccer doesn't seem to be doing the trick, I think I'll head to bed to solve my boredom.

G'night people :wave:[/QUOTE]

Night :)

NP Tomayasu Hotei - Katana Groove

katana kicks ***

NW: goldmember

[QUOTE=JACKROXYOU]2 weeks old?[/QUOTE]
I see...

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]I see...[/QUOTE]

Look at the date on the first page.

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]I see...[/QUOTE]

**** nevermind

Back for the moment. What's up folks?

So apparently like like 5 months..how the hell is it only 22.5k posts. :amaze:

[QUOTE=Ripper22]Back for the moment. What's up folks?[/QUOTE]
Nothing much here..just watching the snow, you?

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]So apparently like like 5 months..how the hell is it only 22.5k posts. :amaze:[/QUOTE]

only

metallica's been here longer with half

Nothing...my roommate keeps trying to get me to watch the Butterfly Effect. I'm very resistant to the idea. Any movie that rips off the plot of the Time Machine and stars Ashton Kutcher at the same time can't possibly be as good as he says it is, is my logic. However, I'm wondering if maybe he's right and I'm wrong. Anybody seen the movie that can tell me?

Good evening gentlemen. Ripper, its an OK at best movie. The plot isn't super exciting and as you said, its Ashton Kutcher, how good CAN it be.

[QUOTE=Ripper22]Nothing...my roommate keeps trying to get me to watch the Butterfly Effect. I'm very resistant to the idea. Any movie that rips off the plot of the Time Machine and stars Ashton Kutcher at the same time can't possibly be as good as he says it is, is my logic. However, I'm wondering if maybe he's right and I'm wrong. Anybody seen the movie that can tell me?[/QUOTE]
It would've been better if they hadn't used Ashton.

Plus there's some very sad parts :upset:

ashtons the weakest link

[QUOTE=Ripper22]Nothing...my roommate keeps trying to get me to watch the Butterfly Effect. I'm very resistant to the idea. Any movie that rips off the plot of the Time Machine and stars Ashton Kutcher at the same time can't possibly be as good as he says it is, is my logic. However, I'm wondering if maybe he's right and I'm wrong. Anybody seen the movie that can tell me?[/QUOTE]
Its not bad at all...i for one like it...its my opinion though ...and i guess the R&M forum works alot differantly then my bass forum.

i thought that movie was awesome,and the time machine sucked major a**,at least the new version did,god that was horrible,but i never saw the originally one,but the butterfly effect had a good story to it and was pretty funny

[QUOTE=JACKROXYOU]ashtons the weakest link[/QUOTE]

He's still good on That 70's show.

and ashton has a serious part in this movie unlike dude wheres my car and he had really good acting in it

[QUOTE=clayman112388]He's still good on That 70's show.[/QUOTE]

yea i guess

[QUOTE=clayman112388]He's still good on That 70's show.[/QUOTE]

ya hes awesome in that show,**** i havent watched that show in forever,whens the next season?