[QUOTE=Superpeer;15509463]thtylisthsths[/QUOTE]

Did you just have a stroke?

No, but I spat all over my screen!

I used to have a great stylist but she went away. She gave head massages with every hair cut.

[QUOTE=Kage;15509464][url]http://s94.photobucket.com/albums/l83/Redrawing/?action=view&current=Picture3-1.png[/url][/QUOTE]

Damn it, Kage. You're not making this any easier.

Does anyone else think The Beatles are ridiculously overrated? I recently got Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, and while I like it, Led Zeppelin, who's first album was released only a couple years after, were miles ahead of them.

The Beatles are catchy as hell and fun to listen to. Led Zeppelin sucks though.

[QUOTE=Charizard;15509569]Led Zeppelin sucks though.[/QUOTE]

truth

If any band is overrated it's Led Zeppelin... and the Beatles, both are. But the Beatles are enjoyable.

[QUOTE=Charizard;15509598]If any band is overrated it's Led Zeppelin... and the Beatles, both are. But the Beatles are enjoyable.[/QUOTE]

Seconded.

Led Zeppelin is overrated for a band that stole most of their riffs and melodies and the Beatles are overrated for a band that fed off Frank Zappa's concepts and ideas.

But yeah, the Beatles are good and Led Zeppelin is not.

How is Zeppelin not enjoyable?

The Beatles'd be sick if they had more breakdowns.

@ Luc: Boooooooring.

[QUOTE=Charizard;15509598]If any band is overrated it's Led Zeppelin... and the Beatles, both are. But the Beatles are enjoyable.[/QUOTE]

Sloppy stolen blues leads on guitar, atrocious vocals.

and yeah boring.

Led Zeppelin have some good songs, but the Beatles have a lot more.

Lemon Song, that's it.

[QUOTE=Cocaine;15509637]Sloppy stolen blues leads on guitar, atrocious vocals.

and yeah boring.[/QUOTE]

And the Beatles' vocals are better... how?

[QUOTE]And the Beatles' vocals are better... how?[/QUOTE]
They're not incessant and there's more of them. They're not as starved for attention.

Well, because they actually sort of sing within their ranges for one thing...

[url]http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/health/2007/11/06/bpr.india.toddler.surgery.dutta.cnn[/url]

Have you guys seen this 8 limbed Indian baby? She was born with a parasitic headless twin attatched to her :\

[QUOTE=Cocaine;15509678][url]http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/health/2007/11/06/bpr.india.toddler.surgery.dutta.cnn[/url]

Have you guys seen this 8 limbed Indian baby? She was born with a parasitic headless twin attatched to her :\[/QUOTE]

holy ****.

[QUOTE=Luc214;15509649]And the Beatles' vocals are better... how?[/QUOTE]

Here, There and Everywhere

Yeah, Robert Plant sings like metal vocalists sing now. V annoying in most songs.

[QUOTE=Superpeer;15509868]Yeah, Robert Plant sings like metal vocalists sing now.[/QUOTE]

False.

[QUOTE=Cocaine;15509678][url]http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/health/2007/11/06/bpr.india.toddler.surgery.dutta.cnn[/url]

Have you guys seen this 8 limbed Indian baby? She was born with a parasitic headless twin attatched to her :\[/QUOTE]
That's crazy, man.
[QUOTE=Superpeer;15509868]Yeah, Robert Plant sings like metal vocalists sing now. V annoying in most songs.[/QUOTE]
Those 40/50 year olds have to listen to something new.

All they need to listen to is the classic rock station that recycles the same 8 tracks every hour. And all that needs to be in their record collection is The Best of the Eagles.

Yeah, but what if they're trying to be cool in front of the kids?

I posted the baby link first! >:- (

Its pretty weird. I'd like to know why the twin didn't develop a head.

She looks like Ganesha.

Its quite sexy.

Its like a threesome but you only have to convince one chick. Kinda.