[QUOTE=DeusExMachina]I really think The Final Cut is a lyrical album, not a musical album. Lyrically, it's arguably the most mature thing to date by Waters. However, musically, it's very subpar.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I agree,
T'is very personal.

Personnaly, i think that The final cut is one of the best pink floyd album ever with the wall and WYWH.

Well, its a very divisive album. Some fans say its the best, some say its the worst.

[QUOTE=Lateralias]Oh shoot, made an error.... I was thinking of Momentary Lapse of Reason... Final Cut is the last PF album with Roger in it... wait, is that the one with Fletcher Memorial Home on it? If so, then I didn't care for that album much, just the song I just mentioned.[/QUOTE]

How many albums didn't have Roger on them? I know MLoR didn't, but are there any others?

Waters wasn't on The Division Bell. Also, if you're including live stuff, he wasn't on PULSE either.

Is the Division Bell worth while?

Yes. Yes. And YES! Even Roger Waters, the egomaniac who refused to sign a copy of The Wall for a fan because if had signatures from the other members, said it was good. It's great. It goes back more to their roots.

Im thinking of redoing the review for "The Wall" in the CD reviews section. I dont know how good it would be though :/

He acclaimed it and he wasn't even on it!?! Wow, that's pretty impressive. You'd think he would be bitter about it. I have Momentary Lapse of Reason and I'm really not that impressed with it. It's still better than most of the stuff out there, but not great like Floyd's other stuff.

So then is The Division Bell more proggy and less poppish than MLoR? Another question, is the album cover of The Division Bell those two Aztek looking statues facing each other?

[QUOTE=kombucha mushroom mofo]
Another question, is the album cover of The Division Bell those two Aztek looking statues facing each other?[/QUOTE]

Yes

Division Bell is great. Its got two instrumental tracks, and its really creative. I wouldn't say its super progressive, because the Pink Floyd sound had been done for 20+ years by then, so its hard for it to be "progressive." However, it definitely doesn't have that 80's pop feel of AMLOR. I highly recommend it.

Allright, it shall be my next Floyd purchase after the Wall DVD. :thumb:

Excellent. The Wall DVD is also awesome.

[QUOTE=DeusExMachina]Also, the song WYWH isn't about Syd. It applies to him, sure, but its not actually about him. I'm in a rush, but I'll clarify later.[/QUOTE]

Finally. I agree with you on this one.

[QUOTE=DeusExMachina]Yes. Yes. And YES! Even Roger Waters, the egomaniac who refused to sign a copy of The Wall for a fan because if had signatures from the other members, said it was good. It's great. It goes back more to their roots.[/QUOTE]
Thats is quite surprising.

Isn't it?

And Magicbus, glad to see you agree with me!

Everybody's been saying that WYWH is about Syd, but only SOYCD was written about him. I've never really had time to explain this though. I'm glad you brought it up.


Oh, and I have those DT covers. AIM=rockshowguy56

I'm so IMing you right now to get them.

Are they the ones off of "A Change in Seasons"?

Couldn't tell ya. Not into DT, just love these songs. Sounds just like Gilmour's solo.

Is one In the Flesh?

No. It's Comfortably Numb and Hey You.

oh ok
so its not what I was thinking.

I haven't listened to Hey You yet, but Comfortably Numb is a live recording. It's pretty good. The guitar playing is a VERY impressive replica of Gilmour, and the guy who sings Gilmour's part does a good job.

[QUOTE=DeusExMachina]It's pretty good. The guitar playing is a VERY impressive replica of Gilmour[/QUOTE]

Stupid Petrucci. He can do anything. :rolleyes: You wouldn't happen to have MSN IM would you?

No, sorry. I could email it to you if you have gmail, or anything else that takes big attachments.

At the end of Comfortably Numb, you hear bits of them covering other Pink Floyd songs... what Pink Floyd whores! :lol:

And Petrucci may be good at replicating Gilmour, but Gilmour is still better as far as I'm concerned.

your thinking of the medley from the ACOS album with in the flesh, carry on wayward son, bohemian rhapsody, lovin' touchin' squeezin', cruise control and turn it on again. they did an awesome job on that. i never thought anyone could do gilmour's solo on comfortable numb, but i was proven wrong.

[QUOTE=shawnson]your thinking of the medley from the ACOS album with in the flesh, carry on wayward son, bohemian rhapsody, lovin' touchin' squeezin', cruise control and turn it on again. they did an awesome job on that. i never thought anyone could do gilmour's solo on comfortable numb, but i was proven wrong.[/QUOTE]
Ya thats what I was thinking of.

send CN to [email]constipatedhack@gmail.com[/email] please

[QUOTE=DeusExMachina]And Petrucci may be good at replicating Gilmour, but Gilmour is still better as far as I'm concerned.[/QUOTE]

Technically, Petrucci has the upper hand by far, but he can't bring nearly as much emotion through the speakers, so yes, I must agree with you.