[QUOTE=ArrestThisMan;16074176]What do you guys use to scrobble your iPod?[/QUOTE]

I don't have an iPod, but I'm frankly tired of fielding iTunes help questions—iTunes is a piece of sh[size=2]i[/size]t—so I should like to point out there are alternatives such as LastPod

[url]http://www.lastpod.org/[/url]

I use the built-in scrobbling in Sonata btw; it's a great program

[url]http://i28.tinypic.com/k0lzmd.png[/url]

[QUOTE=Cocaine;16074238]Yes[/QUOTE]

I was talking to Chris.

Thanks guys.

Chris...relax brah.

[QUOTE=Cocaine;16074190]no, like:

1 - Band - 6hr
2 - Band - 5hr

Cause playcounts can be misleading. Like, I had 19 Reverend Bizarre plays on my computer last week, which is like 48 hours of music.[/QUOTE]

Yes, I was thinking about that myself

Summoning has some very long tracks and, while they'd still be my #1 artist in any case, they get overrepresented somewhat because they take a huge chunk of any finite amount of time.

I think Nadja would jump up quite a bit on a few people's lists.

Om too.

boner

1 CunninLynguists 54
2 Afghan Whigs 46
3 Frank Zappa 21
4 King Geedorah 15
5 Ghostface 14
6 Oh No 13
7 Minus the Bear 7
8 Colour Haze 6
8 Aesop Rock Meets The J. Kingz 6
10 Binary Star 5

Sweet list, Pulse.

1. Minutemen - 322
2. Hüsker Dü - 171
3. The Replacements - 167
4. Gang of Four - 125
5. Mission of Burma - 52
6. Queensrÿche - 49
6. Morrissey - 49
8. Mötley Crüe - 14
9. The Rolling Stones - 13
9. Paul McCartney - 13

ouch.

There was that thing where it took an average and gave you an adjusted overall list based on time.

[QUOTE=1338 h4x0r;16074254]I don't have an iPod, but I'm frankly tired of fielding iTunes help questions—iTunes is a piece of sh[size=2]i[/size]t—so I should like to point out there are alternatives such as LastPod

[url]http://www.lastpod.org/[/url]

I use the built-in scrobbling in Sonata btw; it's a great program

[url]http://i28.tinypic.com/k0lzmd.png[/url][/QUOTE]

iTunes is good.

Uh, no it's not.

i am a winamp simpleton

Winamp ftw!

I hate Winamp

winamp rules all over iTunes tbh.

winamp freezes as soon as i open it because my music library is too large

kinda like me and females


only they melt instead of freeze

and it's penis instead of music library

[QUOTE=i am the robots;16076144]winamp freezes as soon as i open it because my music library is too large[/QUOTE]

Same

[QUOTE=i am the robots;16076144]winamp freezes as soon as i open it because my music library is too large[/QUOTE]winamp is better when you just drag the folder into the player

which is what i do

and is a lot easier

**** music libraries

Winamp >>> iTunes. Winamp supports more far more file types and you can actually get plug-ins for more functionality. With iTunes you only get what it comes with, and it's annoying. Plus, Winamp's got milkdrop, which is pretty awesome.

I actually don't use Winamp though, I use foobar2000, because it's not bloated with tones of **** like iTunes and Winamp are, and it's pretty much as customizable as it gets. I don't recommend it to everyone though, because most people aren't willing to spend the time to figure it out.

fooobar

morelike fubar.

fu‪ckubar

With correct equalizer options and decent speakers winamp does a damn fine trick for me.

winamp rules

amarok



i tried helping a friend with his dinosaur computer that could run Winamp 3 at most to i dled it to see wtf he was doin and after I got rid of it winamp wont do stuff normally (I saved winamp 3 in a different program folder and did this that an blah blah blah) and i'm too lazy to install it again

Winamp is friggin' awesome.

[QUOTE=ArrestThisMan;16074359]Sweet list, Pulse.[/QUOTE]

everyone take note of this comment if one is aspiring to like good music ok thank you

I used to use Winamp but now I use foobar. Am I a bad person?

I use Rythmbox cuz i have linux