enlighten me.


does the boy have a different biological father???

its the boys mother

hehe nice. now answer mine
[QUOTE]True or False:

This sentence is false.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=lemoley;13463314]its the boys mother[/QUOTE]

I love the riddle.
It makes you focus on the father and son.
So the idea of a mother never pops into your head.

true

a sentence needs to have a verb

Damn. I was about to answer that. :upset:

My strings came in! :D

[QUOTE=lemoley;13463341]true

a sentence needs to have a verb[/QUOTE]

so it's TRUE that the sentence is false? doesn;t that mean that the sentence is lieing? shouldn't the answer be false? but that would make the sentence true right?


there's no answer for it.

The scentence below is False
The scentence above is True

[QUOTE=One Groovin Clown;13463372]The scentence below is False
The scentence above is True[/QUOTE]

there ya go.


you know whats funny is that people will act as if saying something has been scientifically proven means more then other types of evidence when science uses the EXSACT same logic as what you just did.

[QUOTE=irishslappop;13463374]there ya go.


you know whats funny is that people will act as if saying something has been scientifically proven means more then other types of evidence when science uses the EXSACT same logic as what you just did.[/QUOTE]

What? Continiously contradicting itself?

Like how electrons used to be seen as particles rotating on a fixed path,
but now they're saying it's all random?

[QUOTE=Aerodyne;13463354]Damn. I was about to answer that. :upset:

My strings came in! :D[/QUOTE]

The FFAC soundtrack totally owns me. It's nice to see that Nobuo hasn't lost his touch.

wow, good one irish :thumb:

anyways im off, my brain hurts lol

see ya guys :wave:

Later days

I've always loved riddles.
Even if i can never get them, theres always something attracting about them.

How to philosophy talk (though that never really started) turn into a series of riddles?

[QUOTE=One Groovin Clown;13463383]What? Continiously contradicting itself?

Like how electrons used to be seen as particles rotating on a fixed path,
but now they're saying it's all random?[/QUOTE]

exsactly. INDUCTION. its the engine that science works on. it says "what happened in the past will tend to repeat itself."

but how do we know that? "because the past HAS repeated itself." Science's way of proof is it's self. seems very different then the science they taught you in school no?

Very much so.
The way i see it is that most research are theories that are very beliviable.
Once the scientists can get enough support behind the theory, then it will be widely accepted as "proven".

thats how it works. its very dissapointing. i see people saying "omfg j00 dont have t3h scienctific evidence." and its starting to piss me off. these people dont even understand how science works and just blindly accept it because your physics teacher TOLD you that it was correct.


didn't teachers TELL they're students that the earth was the center of the universe too??

hmm...

[QUOTE=irishslappop;13463423]
didn't teachers TELL they're students that the earth was the center of the universe too??

hmm...[/QUOTE]

That question always comes up in my head during math class.
Theres all these formulas and methods that work, but how do we know they're right?
And how come we never really learn what the formula is doing?
We learn it to use it to solve meaningless problems.

1+1=3 who's going to prove me wrong??


i bet a mathematician couldn't. he'd probably agree with me.

[QUOTE=irishslappop;13463450]1+1=3 who's going to prove me wrong??


i bet a mathematician couldn't. he'd probably agree with me.[/QUOTE]

1+1=2.

Why? Because that's what modern society has taught me, and modern society is [I]never[/I] wrong.

haha see?

while it's fun bull****ting about this stuff, the common clave american DOESN'T KNOW ****. they eat ALLLLL of it up. in the ear and in the head. WHAT EVER YOU TELL PEOPLE. its a very bad trait that is not getting better.

People have always been ones to "soak" up an information that the majority of leaders say is true. That has never been different.

but its getting worse. on american news you'll see the american soilder shooting ALL BY HIMSELF every time. every single time. on the BCC its shows the american, and next to him the brittish, austrailian, and other european soilders fighting beside him.

isolating the US socially from the rest of the world is one of the governments main priorities right now.


good talk guys but i have work. maybe i'll drop in later and let all of you know that the washington monument has a essence of fiveness and might even contain a soul later.

[quote=irishslappop;13463471]haha see?

while it's fun bull****ting about this stuff, the common clave american DOESN'T KNOW ****. they eat ALLLLL of it up. in the ear and in the head. WHAT EVER YOU TELL PEOPLE. its a very bad trait that is not getting better.[/quote]


But it would be nearly impossible to investigate every bit of evidence, thats where the problem enters.


You would have to pick one topic and spend a lifetime researching it to be almost completely sure that you had proved or disproved it.



I think chaos theroy is the way to go.

I think they're just trying to stay on top.

If they get the idea that America is fighting this "war" all alone then it will give a little more hope for the american people. Thus giving more support towards the gvernment. Wich will allow them to have more freedom in an "arms" race so that they can prove they're still the worlds superpower.

Remember how you said the past repeats itself?
How did world war one start?

[QUOTE=ebe9;13463514]But it would be nearly impossible to investigate every bit of evidence, thats where the problem enters.


You would have to pick one topic and spend a lifetime researching it to be almost completely sure that you had proved or disproved it.



I think chaos theroy is the way to go.[/QUOTE]

dont get me wrong. i accept science before some crack pot bull**** untested theory, its just that so many people accpet science as TRUTH, when it isn't.

[QUOTE=irishslappop;13463450]1+1=3 who's going to prove me wrong??


i bet a mathematician couldn't. he'd probably agree with me.[/QUOTE]

I will.

1+1=2 because math is a creation of man and it is final. We all know how to count and we know what happens when we add numbers together. Numbers are factual and true and unchanging. You can't change the rules by saying 1+1=3 or 1+1=2500.

[QUOTE=One Groovin Clown;13463529]
How did world war one start?[/QUOTE]

[SIZE="6"]I LOVE YOU.[/SIZE]




seriously.

[QUOTE=Spaceman Spiff;13463540] You can't change the rules by saying 1+1=3 or 1+1=2500.[/QUOTE]

why not? who made the rules in the first place and why are their rules more sound then mine? they're not. no matter what the "rules" are subjective to the person that made them. maybe i dont like the number two and would rather have 1+1=3. it still makes sence, by my standards.

As spiff said, they're a convention of mankind.
If we wanted to we could change them, but why would we?