[QUOTE=Grateful Dead]Who's Amanda? :confused:[/QUOTE]
Morissey

YEs! Ipod is now working

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[QUOTE=Zmev]YEs! Ipod is now working

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]

Tsk.

[QUOTE=Zmev]YEs! Ipod is now working

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]

Are you my friend? His iPod just unbroke as well.

[QUOTE=Knifeboy]I'm listening to the leak of Dredg's new cd right now... And.... Oh my god, this is absolutely amazing![/QUOTE]

:eek:

I'mma gonna go searching.

[QUOTE=Grateful Dead]Embassy final :)

I've exams starting on Tuesday, and the snooker is proving to be a welcome distraction from learning enough to do well in them.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, it's proving useful to avoid doing essays and exogeses I have to do, too. An O'Sullivan-Stevens final would've been nice though.

[QUOTE=Bartender]Yeah, it's proving useful to avoid doing essays and exogeses I have to do, too. An O'Sullivan-Stevens final would've been nice though.[/QUOTE]

Who is in the final?

We lost tv about 3 weeks ago :upset:

Stevens and Sean Murphy. O'Sullivan lost to Ebdon before Murphy beat him.

I can't deny Murphy deserves his place, though; considering he's only 22 he's been an excellent player throughout, in pretty much all areas of the game (and his last five frames against Ebdon were somewhat awesome). He's struggling a little against Stevens so far, though.

Well the last time Stevens was in an Embassy final, he went from something like 13-6 up, to losing the match 18-14. So yeah, I wouldn't rule him out. If Murphy wins, he'll be breaking all kinds of records, won't he?

[QUOTE=talk show host]:eek:

I'mma gonna go searching.[/QUOTE]

Did you miss the link in my post right after that one? hehe

[QUOTE=Grateful Dead]
Yeah, 13-7 against Mark Williams, but Stevens wsn't playing half-bad that day either. Williams was just amazing. If Murphy wins, I believe he'll be the first qualifier to win the Embassy Champ., aswell as the 2nd youngest(Stephen Hendry was the youngest, I think)[/QUOTE]

I thought Alex Higgins (still the best :cool:[font=verdana])[/font] was the youngest, at 23. It's not inconceivable that Hendry was younger though..

He'll also be the last ever winner of the Embassy championship, which isn't exactly a record, but something he'll be remembered for nonetheless.

Jesus, I finally got the Alt/Indie Poll's wheels a'turnin'. That was a pain in the patoot.

And the forum just got a whole lot uglier.

[QUOTE=AndreTheHyena]Jesus, I finally got the Alt/Indie Poll's wheels a'turnin'. That was a pain in the patoot.[/QUOTE]
Good job with that. I think it's going to turn out well.

I went to the casino here a couple of nights ago and won $150 playing blackjack. Good times. :)

[QUOTE=br3ad_man]Are you my friend? His iPod just unbroke as well.[/QUOTE]

Yes crazy internet man, it is I.

I move to strike the Beatles from the Great Poll. Already, they have a [i]lot[/i] of votes, and I don't think they are generalized enough to be that important. I should have caught it earlier. . .Agree? Disagree?

[QUOTE=Zappa]And the forum just got a whole lot uglier.[/QUOTE]

Heh, I can't wait to see the final results from this 'Poll of the Greatest Alt/Indie Bands of All-time blahblahblahblah' and all the crap bands that will be voted to the top. The polls are still rather bare.

I tried. :upset:

And an excellent try it was.

Remove the Beatles I say.

Will do. They will no longer appear. Screw you, Paul McCartney.

So will Bob Dylan be removed too?

I say DON'T remove The Beatles, for one.

Though, it all depends upon whether you want 'The Most Important Alt/Indie Bands' or 'The Most Important Bands For The Alt/Indie Genre'. There's a difference. The Beatles weren't an indie band unto themselves, but they had a massive influence on the genre.

Same for Dylan.

[QUOTE=Knifeboy]Did you miss the link in my post right after that one? hehe[/QUOTE]

Actually, yeah I did :p

*downloading now*

[QUOTE=Iai2]I say DON'T remove The Beatles, for one.

Though, it all depends upon whether you want 'The Most Important Alt/Indie Bands' or 'The Most Important Bands For The Alt/Indie Genre'. There's a difference. The Beatles weren't an indie band unto themselves, but they had a massive influence on the genre.[/QUOTE]
Yeah. Although if they were around today rather than then, they'd probably be classed as alt/indie.

And it's not like they're the only band on there who are guilty of not being strictly alt/indie. Dylan, Can, The Clash, etc...

True. Shucks, I dunno. It's just that they're getting so many votes, and I don't want them to end up being the final band chosen, because that's not exactly what I wanted the polls to show.

I doubt they'll beat The Pixies. Or Radiohead.

In any case, you can always pull the 'undeserving voter' routine, like Med did with Dark Side Of The Moon in the Top 100 albums...... ;)

What was that? What happened?

When we did the Top 100 Albums, Dark Side Of The Moon got enough votes to get into the top 10. Loads of the regulars complained, because when you looked at who had voted for it, it was loads of people who never voted in A&I.

So we discounted all their votes. Then me and Med counted all the people who had voted in the preliminary rounds, and decided who was allowed to vote in the final.