Astros don't have a better record then the cards. The Cards have the best (105 - 57) in the MLB.

You idiots, stop spamming my thread :angry:

There are plenty of threads for that very discussion in the pit. Go now!

He was talking about the Yankees/Redsox I assume.

Sorry, Rock. Looks like we have taken over your spamming duties for today. Your services are no longer needed.

But yes, I'll stop, I was just about to say that we should before some one gets mad.

Anyway, The Who. They own.

The Beatles > The Who

I'll agree. The Who were never as diverse as The Beatles. But If I were to give them a rating the Beatles would be 11/10 and the who would be 10.5/10 ;)

[QUOTE=guitrguy]The Beatles > The Who[/QUOTE]

Suprisingly enough, that wasn't very insightful. :rolleyes:

[QUOTE=rock not roll]I'll agree. The Who were never as diverse as The Beatles. But If I were to give them a rating the Beatles would be 11/10 and the who would be 10.5/10 ;)[/QUOTE]

Why are we comparing them. Beatles=Ownage over almost everything. The Who only = Ownage over most things.

[QUOTE=lunch998][B]Why are we comparing them[/B]. Beatles=Ownage over almost everything. The Who only = Ownage over most things.[/QUOTE]

They're the two most popular bands that came out of the british invasion.

Well anyways when you gonna post the next poll?

In the series were winning 3 to 2 and the Killer B's > Your whole lineup....
Your fans suck ***

[QUOTE=lunch998]Suprisingly enough, that wasn't very insightful. :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
It may not be insightful but it needed to be said.

But when I said The Who I wasn't thinking "lets debate over them and the Beatles." We know about the Beatles. We know they are what they are.

[QUOTE=Schyma000]Well anyways when you gonna post the next poll?

In the series were winning 3 to 2 and the Killer B's > Your whole lineup....
Your fans suck ***[/QUOTE]

Ok man drop the baseball.

[QUOTE=lunch998]Why are we comparing them. Beatles=Ownage over almost everything. The Who only = Ownage over most things.[/QUOTE]

Agreed

Just trying to clear things up :)

I would try to start a discussion on another band, but the only thing I'm going to get out of it is that the Beatles>that band.

[QUOTE=lunch998]I would try to start a discussion on another band, but the only thing I'm going to get out of it is that the Beatles>that band.[/QUOTE]

Not if that band happens to be better than the beatles.

I just need to figure out who is in fact better than the beatles :p

[QUOTE=rock not roll]Not if that band happens to be better than the beatles.

I just need to figure out who is in fact better than the beatles :p[/QUOTE]

Now we have a task on our hands.

Stairway to Heaven>The Beatles
:lol:

*goes to jail for making that comment*

Of course because you cant compare Beatles to anyone.

[QUOTE=Medopalis]Pink Floyd > The Beatles.


Other than that, you're struggling.[/QUOTE]

That's a stretch.

Miles Davis>The Beatles. I had to switch genres.

[QUOTE=Medopalis]Pink Floyd > The Beatles.


Other than that, you're struggling.[/QUOTE]

Agreed. Them and Neil Young :D (goes to jail as well)

[QUOTE=Medopalis]Pink Floyd > The Beatles.


Other than that, you're struggling.[/QUOTE]

no :rolleyes:

[QUOTE=rock not roll]Agreed. Them and Neil Young :D (goes to jail as well)[/QUOTE]

We can be cell-mates!

On a side note my new jam band experiment is going to be called the Grateful Floyd in a stange attempt to combine Pink Floyd and the Grateful Dead into one super-band.

[QUOTE=lunch998]We can be cell-mates![/QUOTE]


I call top bunk!


We all have different music tastes and obviously we all like bands more than the Beatles. But when it's said and done they're the band that eveyone agrees was the greatest ('cept for pink floyd ;)).

[QUOTE=Medopalis]Why not? Floyd at their best (WYWH), are better than The Beatles at their best, imo, and I'd definitely rate their songwriting higher, without any doubt at all. The Beatles were more consistent, but Floyd had more unbelievable moments.[/QUOTE]

Yea I guess the argument is that even if Floyd's best is better, the Beatles had more bests. I might actually prefer Floyd though.

maybe I should incorperate ">" and "<" and "Bob Dylan" in a post.

[QUOTE=rock not roll]I call top bunk!


We all have different music tastes and obviously we all like bands more than the Beatles. But when it's said and done they're the band that eveyone agrees was the greatest ('cept for pink floyd ;)).[/QUOTE]

Curses. I call not-bitch.