Posted by some guy on the Megadeth forums

[QUOTE]So I was at the record store yesterday, and the cashier handed me this CD as I was leaving. On the cover it read ROADRUNNER RECORDS and on the back it read “The Definition of Dominance and there were 15 tracks. 15 songs from 15 different bands. There was some Hatebreed, Dragonforce, Opeth, Still Remains, you name it… but… there wasn’t 15 tracks. After the 15th song played through and finished, did the disc stop? No… there was one more track. Song #16, a 30 second long snippet of some real fast, trashy riff, then it cuts out…[/QUOTE]

It has been rumored to be a snippet off the new Megadeth album :cool:

[url]http://www.megaupload.com/?d=9NPDQOH0[/url]

[QUOTE=playguitar]Of Mice and Men? Come on. Or what about Risk. Or really I should say, good metal. No?[/QUOTE]
Ummm, just because he makes one or two non-metal songs, doesn't mean he's stopped making metal. Plus, afaik, Friedman had a lot to do with Risk.

[QUOTE=playguitar] Damnit Mustaine, write metal again.[/QUOTE]
So what was TSHF?
Pop-punk?

[QUOTE]You can rip yourself off by making a ****ty sequel song to Hangar 18 with a similar sound, with similar lyrics and song structure...idiot. Ooh...[/QUOTE]
Yeah I mean Megadeth are the only band to ever have used the same song structure in 2 songs.
It's not like it's important. So what if he ripped his own song off?

[QUOTE=playguitar]You can rip yourself off by making a ****ty sequel song to Hangar 18 with a similar sound, with similar lyrics and song structure...idiot. Ooh...[/QUOTE]
You my friend... are a dumb[COLOR="Black"]a[/COLOR]ss. Not only do you fail to recognize that Return to Hangar 18 is a sequel, which should be obvious from the very name, you also fail to realize it is impossible to rip off your own song. Plagiarism isn't defined as using your own material. You can't rip off material that you created and have the rights too. Plagiarism is using somebody else's ideas and presenting them as your own. Mustaine when he wrote a sequel to Hangar 18 wasn't plagiarisng (ripping off) his own work. He simply took a popular song he had created and changed the song structure and the lyrics slightly to make a similar song that represents the same style that the original song was created with. He created a sequel. :smash: There's a new idea nobody's ever heard of...

[QUOTE=Apocalyptic Raids]It's a sequel, not a ripoff you idiot. It's obviously supposed to be Hangar 18 Pt. 2.

How the f[size=2]u[/size]ck can you rip yourself off? :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
Well, when a person feels very special, they can...

[QUOTE=Aw3someman]You my friend... are a dumb[COLOR="Black"]a[/COLOR]ss. Not only do you fail to recognize that Return to Hangar 18 is a sequel, which should be obvious from the very name, you also fail to realize it is impossible to rip off your own song. Plagiarism isn't defined as using your own material. You can't rip off material that you created and have the rights too. Plagiarism is using somebody else's ideas and presenting them as your own. Mustaine when he wrote a sequel to Hangar 18 wasn't plagiarisng (ripping off) his own work. He simply took a popular song he had created and changed the song structure and the lyrics slightly to make a similar song that represents the same style that the original song was created with. He created a sequel. :smash: There's a new idea nobody's ever heard of...[/QUOTE]

Sequels always suck. You can rip off your own song, he did. It's a lame attempt at recapturing the magic hangar 18 has. I didn't say he plagarized, he ripped it off, there is a difference. Ripping something off is taking an idea, (whether it's your own or not) and changing it a bit, making it different, but you can still tell it's just a pale imitation of one of Deth's greatest songs.

[QUOTE=Happy]So what was TSHF?
Pop-punk?


Yeah I mean Megadeth are the only band to ever have used the same song structure in 2 songs.
It's not like it's important. So what if he ripped his own song off?[/QUOTE]

It's not pop punk, it's a couple of okay songs, with a couple of really bad songs.

It's not just the same structure that bothers me, it's that he tried to make another good song out of a great song, and failed miserably. I think it's really lame with lines like "still two words that can't make sense!", and how it fails to be a good sequel at all. It's like Zorro 2.

[QUOTE=Chu]Ummm, just because he makes one or two non-metal songs, doesn't mean he's stopped making metal. Plus, afaik, Friedman had a lot to do with Risk.[/QUOTE]

I know, but he needs to come out with just an *** kicking, balls out, metal record. There's not enough of that around today.

Uh, Dave did...it's called[I] The System Has Failed.[/I]
Where have you been?

NP-Trust

[QUOTE=Lord Abortion]Uh, Dave did...it's called[I] The System Has Failed.[/I]
Where have you been?

NP-Trust[/QUOTE]

I've been listening to TSHF. Of mice and men? Die Dead Enough? Back in the Day? Not *** kicking metal.

Okay, oh wisdom inclined one, tell me why the hell not, and in your oh so valuble opinion, what is?

[QUOTE=Lord Abortion]Okay, oh wisdom inclined one, tell me why the hell not, and in your oh so valuble opinion, what is?[/QUOTE]

The Conjuring, Holy Wars, Looking Down the Cross, Set the World Afire, Take no Prisoners. You know, songs that sound metal.

I rate the Scorpion and Back in the day higher than all those songs except Holy wars.

[QUOTE=Lord Abortion]I rate the Scorpion and Back in the day higher than all those songs except Holy wars.[/QUOTE]

We must have different musical tastes. Or there is something terrible wrong with your mind. It's one or the other, but I'm leaning towards the latter.

Heheh, seriously though. You like the NWOBHM?
What's your favourite band from that period?
Other than Maiden and Def Leppard, who are the best band of all time and vomit inducing, respectively.

There's too much good stuff, but a few are bands like Venom, Maiden, Priest, Angel Witch, Diamond Head, Blitzkrieg, Motorhead, I don't really know if Mercyful Fate counts in here, but they're kick *** anyways, Saxon, Girl School, and Tygers of Pan Tang. It's freakin hard to find some of those groups damn records, but it's worth it.

Angel Witch are the kings of NWOBHM. Raven kicks *** too.

[QUOTE=playguitar]There's too much good stuff, but a few are bands like Venom, Maiden, Priest, Angel Witch, Diamond Head, Blitzkrieg, Motorhead, I don't really know if Mercyful Fate counts in here, but they're kick *** anyways, Saxon, Girl School, and Tygers of Pan Tang. It's freakin hard to find some of those groups damn records, but it's worth it.[/QUOTE]
Well, Priest and Venom aren't really part of the NWOBHM, nor Motorhead, because they were around before in Priest and Motorhead's case and a little after in Venom's.
Angel Witch and Tygers are pretty good, as Are Diamond head, I saw them supporting 'deth last year. They were excellent.
You might want to try Samson, who had Bruce "God" Dickinson singing for them before he joined Maiden, and maybe Toad the wet Sprocket, Wytchfynder, Preying Mantis, heh, Maybe even Ethel The Frog

Why all the terrible names?

Because it was the 80's?

Of course.

Ollie wins this thread.

I win every thread.

So true.

NP: Eidolon
The Drovers are awesome.

I'd say Back in the Day is some *** kicking metal.

I really like Blackmail the Universe too :p

Aussie Ticket Details/Prices

[url]http://www.ticketmaster.com.au/eventprofiles/profiles.asp?profileid=2977[/url]

$86 \m/

Expensive, but probably worth it.

I don't really think it's that expensive for what you're getting.

I guess. The Who concert I'm going to was 130 dollars..

I dunno, in my opinion I'd only be paying to see Megadeth, and as they have another CD coming out, maybe they'll do a tour which will be cheaper and have a longer set time.