and elisha cuthbert = teh hotness

amirite?

duuuuuuust in the wind

YOU"RE MY BOY, BLUE! YOU'RE MY BOY!

/never saw Old School

elisha cuthbert definitely = hotness

its fairly decent actually.


Anchor Man, now that was un-funny

hmm I wonder if I have anyt old PMFK tapes lying around

urrite. vince vaughan is the f'ing man in that movie too.

Anchorman sucked balls. Dodgeball though, I know it's cheesy, I know it's quite lame, but I'll be damned if White Goodman isn't one of the best characters ever

I thought Anchorman was hilarious

I just thought it relied on it's stupidity to get laughs rather than good writing.

really...

i felt stupid for buying it. I know ill never watch it again. Dodgeball was much better, for me anyway

I liked anchorman, but then again I found Team America hilarious while all of my movie-savvy friends tel me it was crap

[QUOTE=Sad But True]Anchorman sucked balls. Dodgeball though, I know it's cheesy, I know it's quite lame, but I'll be damned if White Goodman isn't one of the best characters ever[/QUOTE]
Anchorman owned a fair deal. The jokes were precise, it was random and pointless at the right times and it looked good. Dodgeball felt a bit cheap, it wasn't anywhere near as funny once it got going and the ending wa awful. It felt like a kids disney film with more middle aged male actors.

F[COLOR="Black"]U[/COLOR]CK THAT!

Team America is the single greatest film ever. These so called 'savvy' friends probably just watched the film, instead of realising what it's trying to say (in a not so subtle way)

Team America's aweseom but I dont find very rewatchable

I loved Team America so much.

The last film I've watched and really didn't like was Napolean Dynamite, which everyone I've spoken to seemed to love.

Anchorman was good up until the ending. I loved the tool from "The Office" though.

i love napolean dynamite actually. The characters really sealed the deal for me

I can literaly watch Team America all day.

And I've never seen Napoleon Dynamite

Was that bench warmers movie any good?





<------------------satanic post count:O

dodgeball>anchorman but only just

I love Napolean Dynamite but it pisses me off when people try to quote it

or wear "Vote for Pedro" tshirts

Any of youns seen Dead Mans Shoes?

Not comedy by any stretch although has some funny moments but an excellent, excellent film.

[QUOTE=Kurrpt]i love napolean dynamite actually. The characters really sealed the deal for me[/QUOTE]
It was good the first couple timtes I saw it. Now I hate it

i really dont respect most peoples opinions when it comes to movies.


i will say i love team america, and thought it was brilliant

everything matt stone and trey parker make is brilliant

they are definitely comical in nature. I dont always find everything they do or make funny, but i respect them none the less

Napoleon Dynamite was the stupidest movie I have ever seen in my life.

sucks to be you then

I want this book.

[url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0833030477/ref=sr_11_1/102-2062513-4572117?%5Fencoding=UTF8[/url]

Just listen to the reviews.

[QUOTE]A truly amazing genre-breaking work of art unlike any that has ever been or ever will. I was captivated from the moment I opened the cover until the extremely suspenseful moment I turned the last page. With that said, I was a little disappointed that 71602 was knocked off by 92937 just as the plot was unfolding, but the arrival of 96240 really got my blood pumping and I just couldn't put the book down from that moment on.

I am so glad that Amazon.com is offering the "Search Inside This Book" option for this book so that it can be enjoyed by countless other avid readers who otherwise may not have come across it. I wait, impatiently, for the audio CD version of this fine book.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE]It wasn't a bad book, it did have its good points, but I'd recommend waiting until the movie comes out.
I hear rumours that Emilio Estevez is up for the lead[/QUOTE]

After exploring the "Search Inside This Book" feature and snooping through a few of the embedded prose poems, I knew that this was a book I needed on my shelf. (Though I do admit I ordered it (ostensibly) for my girlfriend's birthday--and borrowed it when she was done!) I finished the tome in one enraptured sitting and, despite a limp third act denouement, the book was taut, well paced, and fresh.

I do, however, have one concern. I stumbled upon the book while looking up the ISBN number for Haynes' Owner Workshop Manual for Honda 2-valve Twins (1977 - 1985) -- and I got to thinking... Perhaps running across ISBN# 1 85010 359 3 in Rand's "A Million Random Digits" wasn't a coincidence -- perhaps some of the digits aren't that *random* at all. I don't mean to be an alarmist--and I certainly don't bandy about charges of plagiarism lightly--but if you will, please note this excerpt from the author's tender preface:

738 9377504 03478 47589 43 705 47309 67490 27348 57490 57443509 37405 40978 39794 "31847 57303!" 57049 325740 57403 7509347?

Now, we can't help but notice a completely different "voice" littered throughout the book. For example, in the opening of the penultimate chapter:

704478 489 705 47390 278 574409 3705 978794 9847 57303 57049 32740 574035093 473

Or the crassness in the "bedroom" scene:

473268978 971 23473 3785 [expletive] 3434987 3490809 34709 34908 40700 34087 439874 97835


And after the embarrassment (we'd all rather forget) concerning Wm. T Metzger's otherwise breathtaking "Table of 10,000 square roots: Gives square roots up to 4 digits on the basis of the square roots arranged in consecutive order 1 to 10,000 and the numbers ranging from 1 to 100,000,000" the publishing world can't afford another snafu.