Okay, last one.

[IMG]http://img226.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-21885/loc521/93235_Lollapalooza_Chicago_Aug_32_2007c_122_521lo.jpg[/IMG]
[img]http://img121.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-7824/loc512/93243_Lollapalooza_Chicago_Aug_36_2007e_122_512lo.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/picture.php?albumid=207&pictureid=11669[/img]

[IMG]http://img150.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-9723/loc95/93245_Lollapalooza_Chicago_Aug_34_2007f_122_95lo.jpg[/IMG]

Ravishing grimness is apparent.

penis or not i wouldnt touch it

She has the perfect body tbh.

no no no

Not really.

She's good enough, though. Nothing special.

shes not as sexy as toronto

or Lily Allen

or Katy Perry

TBH Linetrap is hotter than every chick mentioned.

Apparently linetrap has a dick?

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17431495]Apparently linetrap has a dick?[/QUOTE]
line[b]trap[/b]



and no linetrap isnt sorry

[quote=hismajestythepope;17431105]This.

And so we return to discussion of booty:
[IMG]http://i30.tinypic.com/2lbnmt1.jpg[/IMG][/quote]
yeahg id **** thatd bitch

dude she clearly has a dick as seen in that video when she gets off the bike

she has a total man face

i've seen a lot of shemales and she's definitely a shemale

and even that *** is a total boy ***

not to mention her large adam's apple

and the fact that she's a man

[QUOTE]and even that *** is a total boy ***[/QUOTE]you would know wouldn't you

sorry

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17431586]you would know wouldn't you

sorry[/QUOTE]

:lol:

I was gonna say that but you beat me to it!

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17431586]you would know wouldn't you

sorry[/QUOTE]

well yes i would know i've seen a lot of boy asses

they don't protrude as much and have less mass on the outer edges and tend to sag a little more

just like the *** that is clearly shown in that pic

I like that black Les Paul in the background

I could see that being a man, I guess.

EDIT @ Alex: yeah that guitar is sweet.

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17431589]I like that black Les Paul in the background[/QUOTE]

i don't

les pauls have such a typecast boring sound that's been overused for the past 40+ years not to mention a decent on is in the $1500-5000 range when I could get a tight ibanez or schecter or fender for $700

Yeah I don't care for the sound all that much, they always seemed kinda boring. But they look cool.

Hollowbodied jazz guitars, Telecasters and SG's are where it's at.

My Ibanez Prestige is where it's at.

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17431595]Yeah I don't care for the sound all that much, they always seemed kinda boring. But they look cool.

Hollowbodied jazz guitars, Telecasters and SG's are where it's at.[/QUOTE]

i hate SGs even more

but yeah I would love a nice tele

edit: yes prestige is the shiznazzle

Telecasters are for hipsters js.

[QUOTE=RetiredAt21;17431604]Telecasters are for hipsters js.[/QUOTE]

they are?

last i knew they were for country guitarists and people who want an uber sweet clean tone?

Teles are definitely for hipsters.

[QUOTE=RetiredAt21;17431608]Teles are definitely for hipsters.[/QUOTE]

well we can agree that today's hipsters have a better taste in guitars than the hipsters of the 70's who all played les pauls

edit: and tbh ibanez's are for hipsters. at least metal hipsters

SGs are gayer than LPs

Ibanez's are for people who want an awesome tone.

[QUOTE=TricksterGRex;17431612]SGs are gayer than LPs[/QUOTE]

i will agree with that they're always so tinny and have no balls and furthermore ac/dc made them popular and they suck

i have a tele and think that if i were to get an ibanez, my collection would be complete