Hey!

Mappy screams in some sick local bands, he knows his shit, ok?

facepalming so hard

Rifles at Recess were so goooooooood.

[QUOTE=adb;18161949]CALLING IT JAZZ-FUSION WHEN THERE'S CLEARLY JAZZ ELEMENTS MIXED IN WITH METAL?!?!

DUR DUR MAPPY DURr[/QUOTE]

I like how yesterday this fag was self-righteously denying he called it jazz fusion. Ahahaha. Talk about no balls, not able to back up his own opinion unless another pretentious loser is there to not know what he's talking about.
[QUOTE=adb;18161943]H&D listen to it and tell me how much post rock influence there is

I only heard half a song worth of it[/QUOTE]
You also heard tuff guy vocals, tech death, and jazz fusion, so we all know how accurate your opinion is.

And you think tremolo picking with bad keyboards is black metal

[QUOTE=HighandDriving;18161940]Deathcore WITH POST ROCK PARTS.

*Planet Explodes[/QUOTE]

Have you listened to their last two albums? Please try to at least listen to what you're talking about before you try to make jokes nobody will think are funny.

P.S. you don't look incredibly butt hurt siding with the guy getting made fun of just because you desperately want to overshadow another user for some weird reason.

[QUOTE=2muchket!;18162043]facepalming so hard[/QUOTE]

Seriously, Brent is the biggest crybaby/least educated person I've ever spoken to in my entire life.

I denied calling it just jazz-fusion, you incredibly thick and love twisting everything I say around, you know you're wrong yet cease to drop it

pathetic

like my god, both reviews mentioned the jazz elements, you are such an ass and it's so obvious you're trolling

its a deathcore album w/ post rock parts? When theres jazz fusion parts, and technical aspects

and you refuse to say it has those elements just to get a rise out of me

it may be a psychological issue you have to cope with, knowing you're wrong and being conscious of it, yet insisting you're right because you have no other means of self-confidence because you're white trash

Yet you said it's jazz fusion. You even quoted yourself calling it jazz fusion.

Also, on the second song, 35th listen of the album so far.

3 post rock parts so far, the third one being the majority of the second song.

EDIT:
Brent, this is your argument style:

Deny things you said. Call other people stupid. Spout more idiocy that's inaccurate. Call other people stupid.

Disagreeing with you and being right does not make me thick. It does not make me stupid.

Nobody thinks your review is accurate or well written, stop fucking crying.

i did not say it was STRAIGHT JAZZ FUSION

don't make me get the quote again, oh wait you'll just quote mine it and be unaware what quote mining is, either playing dumb or honestly being that much of a half-wit

then you'll focus on a totally different argument that has no bearing whatsoever because the album sucks

"There is much better jazz fusion out there."

Direct quote, your words. That's calling it jazz fusion, that's not saying it has jazz elements. There's a huge difference.

Remember your argument before you try to hold an argument, because otherwise you dance around looking like a huge dumb ass with no point.

EDIT: lol where have I changed my argument? That's what you've been doing THE WHOLE TIME.

I guarantee you probably listened to this through like once or twice and didn't even pay attention until you heard breakdowns and then flipped out about how unstructured it is, because you're one of the few people saying it's unstructured.

there it is ladies and gentlemen, just as I predicted he quote mines me, taking the entire quote out of context to look smart

keyword: look

Brent, here, I'll take the entire quote you posted when you tried this on the review site. You know the one where the parts leading up to it had nothing to do with that part?

Use an argument other than, "I'M NOT WRONG YOU'RE JUST STUPID," already, because it's getting tiresome how many points you can just ignore in your attempt to convince yourself you're never wrong.

The Red Shore leaked I see. Only listened once so far though so i dunno.

Any base opinions?
[QUOTE=asdemonsburn]here's my whole quote, retards:

it would sound better if they didn't try to jam so much non-sense into one song

the breakdowns are the epitome of filler too

there is a few really great melodies in a couple songs but not enough for me to put up with the bad jazz, bad ambient, bad vocals

so much better jazz fusion out there, so much better space themed music that stays within itself and doesn't sound forced
[/QUOTE]

there, in what way does the rest of that quote make my point moot?

Also, you clearly don't get what you're listening to if you're calling this nonsensical, because it's extremely well structured, and rather subdued.

...And referring to the breakdowns as filler is completely laughable, because every (chug) breakdown is the result of a build up and transitions to another heavy part seamlessly.

[QUOTE=Dimmu Burger;18162247]The Red Shore leaked I see. Only listened once so far though so i dunno.[/QUOTE]

its growing on me

[QUOTE=adb;18158560]it would sound better if they didn't try to jam so much non-sense into one song

the breakdowns are the epitome of filler too

there is a few really great melodies in a couple songs but not enough for me to put up with the bad jazz, bad ambient, bad vocals

so much better jazz fusion out there, so much better space themed music that stays within itself and doesn't sound forced[/QUOTE]

here's my entire quote, notice how you mention jazz fusion only and not the space themed music and ambient aspects parts. Not once did I say this is just jazz fusion. You're just interpreting it the wrong way and making absolutely nothing into a colossal argument

I'm saying there's much better jazz fusion out there because there is, why listen to parts of bad jazz fusion when I can listen to entire albums of GOOD jazz fusion

so stfu and crawl into your basement

Reread both of my posts referring to this, I already was "pathetic" enough to "mine" for the entire quote.

My point is that all of those other details listed there are negligible, as they're unrelated thoughts.

Aaaaannd that saying, "so much better jazz fusion out there," is in fact calling it jazz fusion.

Also, read a few posts up, you just called it jazz fusion AGAIN, which you NEVER did.

[QUOTE]...And referring to the breakdowns as filler is completely laughable, because every (chug) breakdown is the result of a build up and transitions to another heavy part seamlessly.[/QUOTE]

why the fuck would I want to hear music that builds up into half time chugging?
[QUOTE]
Aaaaannd that saying, "so much better jazz fusion out there," is in fact calling it jazz fusion.[/QUOTE]

wow asserting opinion as fact, you win I lose

Okay, how does that make the breakdowns filler?

It's like you're not actually arguing your own points, you're just trying to make yourself look too intelligent for chugging breakdowns.

Which is completely not the point of this album

listened to a couple songs from exoplanet earlier and idk, i dont hate it, which surprised me, breakdowns were fuckin punishing

It's an interesting mix of styles. How xtuffx are these vocals bro? :p

because thats my opinion as a music listener, deal with it

Okay, you don't like the breakdowns, cool, that's your opinion, that doesn't mean that they're not thoughtfully written into the songs, a la, use of the term [i]filler[/i].

And deal with it, what a profound argument. You are the Zeus of critical thinking, truly.
[QUOTE=Gangrene;18162261]wow asserting opinion as fact, you win I lose[/QUOTE]

How is that an opinion?

"So much better jazz fusion out there,"

So much better jazz fusion than what? I'm assuming you're talking about the Contortionist, because otherwise that makes zero sense in the context.

So yeah, once more, that's not my opinion, that's just the literal meaning of what you said.

So now we've come to the conclusion that you don't even know what the word [i]opinion[/i] means, along with [i]contradiction[/i]. Would you like any more English lessons, Brent?

are we STILL arguing with brent about the contortionist

also did he just call this album jazz fusion

I just explained the literal meaning of what I said over 9000 times but you will not quit

[QUOTE=Luc214;18162282]are we STILL arguing with brent about the contortionist[/QUOTE]

he refuses to stop and goes around in circles

Yo, you just ignored Ethan's question.
[QUOTE=Gangrene;18162284]I just explained the literal meaning of what I said over 9000 times but you will not quit[/quote]
No, you explained what you meant to say and refuse to realize that, "so much better jazz fusion out there," is implying this is jazz fusion.

And why the fuck should I care, because you back pedaled and called it jazz fusion as soon as you thought someone was agreeing with you... contradicting yourself the third time on this single issue thus far, and now we're on like 10.

So do you think it's jazz fusion or not? Cause at this point I don't even think you know.

The issue is, I've destroyed every single argument you've made against this album, and you continue to call me stupid for not understanding your 5th grade level composition, get your head out yo ass son.

This will stop when you finally admit that your criticism of the album is extremely unformed, and haphazardly composed.

how is this jazz fusion

djent/prog metal inspired deathcore or gtfo

at this point I don't even know if you're mentally stable

I've said it has jazz fusion elements since the beginning and still do, I'm done with this

whether you refuse to accept what I'm saying is your problem not mine