text is a static form
people express themselves through dynamic forms, such as text

what

dudes


c'mon

[QUOTE=fingers mccoy;18928156]text is a static form
people express themselves through dynamic forms, such as text

what[/QUOTE]

text is static but people are dynamic

when you do not know the person irl at all, you have complete subjectivity when you communicate with them with text since you cannot know if they are being literal or facetious.

that is not what subjectivity means

and if i did accept that as true it would only apply to 'people you do not know at all'

which is an absolutely retarded distinction to draw because where do you draw the line in terms of how well you know them

the distinction between subjective and objective is not continuous

your ability to know whether or not you're correct does not change anything

[QUOTE=Mr. Ron;18928158]dudes


c'mon[/QUOTE]


so much anger :(

Sup Steve whats good these days

[QUOTE=fingers mccoy;18928161]that is not what subjectivity means

[/QUOTE]

pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/subjective

the oral interpretation of written language

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/reading?s=t

which is exactly what text isn't

i'm glad you're finally acknowledging some sensible definitions tho

even if you mistakenly think the object of subjective interpretation is the subjective interpretation itself

a conception of another's behavior

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/interpretation+?s=t&ld=1063

the wording adopted by an editor as representing the original words of an author

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/text?s=t&ld=1063

proving my point thrice over

to choose or take as one's own; make one's own by selection or assent

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adopting?s=t&ld=1063

kitsch was right jesus christ

[I]what if what you thought was red was actually blue[/I]

then you would interpret that person as being sarcastic.

but you cannot know if they are if you do not know them, and even if you understand someone's habits does not make interpretation objective

not the point dude

the thing that is being observed is objective
your observation of it is subjective

and that's the whole point of the dichotomy

placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/subjective

which you pretty much have to do with text because it is static.

example

I think fingers is a contrarian jackass

that is subjective because I am placing excessive emphasis on your own moods, attitudes, opinions

it's subjective because you think it

you don't think text

did you just discover philosophy 101 brent

"text is objective" - fingers

"you dont think text" - fingers

to employ one's mind rationally and [B][I][U]objectively [/U][/I][/B]in evaluating or dealing with a given situation

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/think?s=t


welp.

yes brent

thinking does not bring the text into being

pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal; individual: [I]a subjective evaluation. [/I]

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/subjective

yes brent

none of this makes 'text is subjective' true

and welcome to the wonderful word of argumentation.

definitions are not absolute, they are arguable.

you are not OBJECTIVELY right or wrong

basically neither of us can say text is subjective or objective in a factual manner

but then again, I already knew that. you, however dont seem to grasp that concept.

i am one of the two

yes, it is factual you are either right or wrong

however

it is not factual that you are absolutely right...or that you are absolutely wrong

welcoming fingers to the world of argumentation is like welcoming Siegfried & Roy to the world of magic