Hey, i was trying out One for these past weeks. But can't find any background solo in the tabs here. can anyone tab it out for me?

Hey guys i just checked this thread out and have to say KICKASS!! I love metallica and its awesome to see them getting the respect they so richly deserve. I am so sick of seeing people ripping them for actually trying something a little different with St. Anger. I have the utmost respect for them and the impact they've had on music. (i will gladly stick my fender p bass up the *** of anyone that says they suck) And I'm goin to see them this friday w/ Godsmack opening for them. I am so ****ing stoked!!! OMG Im getting jittery just thinking about it. BTW is it safe to wear a Korn shirt to the concert or will i get my *** kicked?? Pink Floyd a safer bet?? Or maybe NIN.....

No.Man bring the Korn t-Shirt
Hehehe hes going to get the **** kicked out of him

awww **** I wrote that down

lol thx.

....or a MetallicA t-shirt

No man im serious wear the Korn T-shirt hehe

i dare ya to go to a megadeth gig with a metallica t-shirt hehe

[QUOTE=The Bell Tolls]i dare ya to go to a megadeth gig with a metallica t-shirt hehe[/QUOTE]

HELL ****ING NO. THANKS. lol. and if i had a metallica t-shirt, i d wear that, but i dont, and if i had the money i'd buy one to wear to it. but i dont.

well, adamthebassist, i'm glad you think the thread is so cool. i'm starting to get tired of it. i think the idea is great, i love metallica, but you have to be careful about saying that or you might get called a "lapdog." the problem is that most of the people on here get way too defensive if you don't agree with their opinion, and then there's those others that come on here and say something just to purposely piss people off. but the worst is those that feel the need to "educate" us. it usually happens when another band is thrown into discussion (i.e. megadeth). Person 1: "I think Metallica is better than Megadeth." Person 2: "Oh no, no, no, Person 1 you are so wrong. Megadeth is so much better. In fact, I'm so much better! And this is why..." one band can sound better to YOU, but you can't say that one is better. it's like saying a turkey sandwich is better than a ham sandwich. wow, i could really go for one of those right now... oh yeah, anyways, they're different, it all depends on your taste. and some people try to say that one band is better because of the way they use scales or certain song-writing techniques or whatever. so what? just because a band doesn't use certain scales or write in different modes doesn't mean they can't do it, maybe they just don't like the way some of that stuff sounds. and just because you don't like to listen to what a band likes to play doesn't mean they suck. some of you try to compare bands and their music like it's a judged olympic event, something that has specific parameters and requirements and where precision can be measured. if you do that with music then you don't really understand it at all.

[QUOTE=ForTheMusic22]well, adamthebassist, i'm glad you think the thread is so cool. i'm starting to get tired of it. i think the idea is great, i love metallica, but you have to be careful about saying that or you might get called a "lapdog." the problem is that most of the people on here get way too defensive if you don't agree with their opinion, and then there's those others that come on here and say something just to purposely piss people off. but the worst is those that feel the need to "educate" us. it usually happens when another band is thrown into discussion (i.e. megadeth). Person 1: "I think Metallica is better than Megadeth." Person 2: "Oh no, no, no, Person 1 you are so wrong. Megadeth is so much better. In fact, I'm so much better! And this is why..." one band can sound better to YOU, but you can't say that one is better. it's like saying a turkey sandwich is better than a ham sandwich. wow, i could really go for one of those right now... oh yeah, anyways, they're different, it all depends on your taste. and some people try to say that one band is better because of the way they use scales or certain song-writing techniques or whatever. so what? just because a band doesn't use certain scales or write in different modes doesn't mean they can't do it, maybe they just don't like the way some of that stuff sounds. and just because you don't like to listen to what a band likes to play doesn't mean they suck. some of you try to compare bands and their music like it's a judged olympic event, something that has specific parameters and requirements and where precision can be measured. if you do that with music then you don't really understand it at all.[/QUOTE]

ham > turkey
me > you

USE PARAGRAPHS!

I believe every band and songs should be appreciated. No songs is composed in any easy manner, it takes time and hardwork. And every song is a masterpiece. I also believe music is universal. Although different people have different perspective into looking things such as musics, I do advice every one of u to appreciate all kinds of musics around. And those people out there who hates Metallica, at least shut the **** up if u don't appreciate.

K since it's getting abit boring, why don't we discuss about tabs and songs. Many Metallica tabs here aren't that accurate or played as their style. People improvised to easy methods which change the creator's way of playing.

No man is better than Cliff. Cliff 'em all and Cliff was god. If he was still alive, im sure he would have been god of bassist.

[QUOTE=The Bell Tolls]its good to see that paranoidd has stfu for a bit.
[/QUOTE]

Don't speak too soon.

I wish Metallica would get a new fvcking producer.

i have 3 questions for you guys: (dont think im making fun of metallica, im personally a big fan myself)

1. why dont they solo anymore
2. why does Lars's snare sound so bad in the st anger album?
3. why is st anger dedicated to the prisoners of st quentin?

1. The solos they had "Dont fit with the music on St. Anger"
2&3 I dunno

[QUOTE=jackz53]i have 3 questions for you guys: (dont think im making fun of metallica, im personally a big fan myself)

1. why dont they solo anymore
2. why does Lars's snare sound so bad in the st anger album?
3. why is st anger dedicated to the prisoners of st quentin?[/QUOTE]

Oh oh, me me!

1. Kirk feels he "doesn't have to prove anything to anybody." Funny, I thought the whole point of a solo was add to the music, not to make yourself out to be a guitar hero. I guess we don't think the same.

2. Well, there are two possible reasons, both concluding with Lars being an idiot. Either Lars used that snare by choice (idiot). Or, Bob Rock set up the snare, and Lars didn't change it (idiot).

3. No clue, but my guess is Metallica is having a mid-life crisis and trying to appear hardcore again.

St Anger is about pent up anger, something you get a lot of in prison.

They could have called the album St. Anal then.

[QUOTE=Paranoidd]They could have called the album St. Anal then.[/QUOTE]
:naughty:

Yes.

Or any of the other words one may associate with prison.

Or not.

[QUOTE=Paranoidd]Oh oh, me me!

1. Kirk feels he "doesn't have to prove anything to anybody." Funny, I thought the whole point of a solo was add to the music, not to make yourself out to be a guitar hero. I guess we don't think the same.

2. Well, there are two possible reasons, both concluding with Lars being an idiot. Either Lars used that snare by choice (idiot). Or, Bob Rock set up the snare, and Lars didn't change it (idiot).

3. No clue, but my guess is Metallica is having a mid-life crisis and trying to appear hardcore again.[/QUOTE]

After watching the movie i can answer no.1

1.Kirk wrote a solo (kicked *** btw) came in to tell the others about it and Lars said that solo's out-date the music and make it sound out-dated. Kirk (and i totally agree with this) told him "By not soloing it lumps us into the same place as the ****ty trend with bands today. And I hate that trend" So they decided to have neither a rule of soloing nor a rule of no soloing. It just got left up to Kirk

2. You know throughout the movie his snare NEVER sounded like that, but i dont mind it so I cant really answer this one.

3. St. Anger was a saint that james had created in his anger managment class while he was in rehab to help with his anger problems

[QUOTE=emo_must_die]After watching the movie i can answer no.1

1.Kirk wrote a solo (kicked *** btw) came in to tell the others about it and Lars said that solo's out-date the music and make it sound out-dated. [/QUOTE]
lars is a ****ing asshole!

[QUOTE=ForTheMusic22]well, adamthebassist, i'm glad you think the thread is so cool. i'm starting to get tired of it. i think the idea is great, i love metallica, but you have to be careful about saying that or you might get called a "lapdog." the problem is that most of the people on here get way too defensive if you don't agree with their opinion, and then there's those others that come on here and say something just to purposely piss people off. but the worst is those that feel the need to "educate" us. it usually happens when another band is thrown into discussion (i.e. megadeth). Person 1: "I think Metallica is better than Megadeth." Person 2: "Oh no, no, no, Person 1 you are so wrong. Megadeth is so much better. In fact, I'm so much better! And this is why..." one band can sound better to YOU, but you can't say that one is better. it's like saying a turkey sandwich is better than a ham sandwich. wow, i could really go for one of those right now... oh yeah, anyways, they're different, it all depends on your taste. and some people try to say that one band is better because of the way they use scales or certain song-writing techniques or whatever. so what? just because a band doesn't use certain scales or write in different modes doesn't mean they can't do it, maybe they just don't like the way some of that stuff sounds. and just because you don't like to listen to what a band likes to play doesn't mean they suck. some of you try to compare bands and their music like it's a judged olympic event, something that has specific parameters and requirements and where precision can be measured. if you do that with music then you don't really understand it at all.[/QUOTE]

I totally agree with you. (sorry to quote the whole thing)

[QUOTE=KingofDudes]ham > turkey
me > you

[/QUOTE]

thanks for proving my point.

dumb@ss

why does saint anger have that weird sound? I think everybody knows what i mean. The guitar's are weird, you can hardly hear the bass, and the drums..(oh, god the drums!!!)?? WTF??

[QUOTE=ForTheMusic22]thanks for proving my point.

dumb@ss[/QUOTE]

:thumb: :lol:

[QUOTE=ForTheMusic22]thanks for proving my point.

dumb@ss[/QUOTE]

oh you owned me :rolleyes:

me > crap > vomit > St. Anger >>>>>>> you + adamtheretardedbassist

[QUOTE=KingofDudes]oh you owned me :rolleyes:

me > crap > vomit > St. Anger >>>>>>> you[/QUOTE]

lol so you're one step above crap.......woohoo!

[QUOTE=KingofDudes]oh you owned me :rolleyes:

me > crap > vomit > St. Anger >>>>>>> you[/QUOTE]

oh and again with the quick wit! ladies and gentlemen, we are truly in the presence of greatness! make sure you watch out for KingofDudes new album hitting stores soon! well, actually, no store would want to sell it, nor would anyone want to buy it, but hell, it MUST be better than anything metallica could put out! my god man, i thought paranoidd was getting annoying but at least he sounds intelligent.

[QUOTE=adamthebassist]lol so you're one step above crap.......woohoo![/QUOTE]

dont worry I included you in it