Pauly gets to be psychobabbled to death!!

[QUOTE=irishslappop]dont teach chem!!! physics owns chem and everyone here knows it. :amaze:[/QUOTE]

Physics is only second to chem.

"Chemists are physicists with out any imagination." XD

I'm proud to be a chemist.

:thumb:

-Gav

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]Isn't it passed your bed time? :p[/QUOTE]

so, i just came here for the buttsecks.

lowsound

Not if I/We dumb babble them to death first!

^ :lol:

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v369/I0Play0Bass/ownedbird.jpg[/IMG]

:thumb:

-Gav

[QUOTE=thelowsoundofbass]so, i just came here for the buttsecks.

lowsound[/QUOTE]
I see. :thumb:

n=a+(dxn)

What are a d and x?

:thumb:

-Gav

[QUOTE=I0Play0Bass]n=a+(dxn)

What are a d and x?

:thumb:

-Gav[/QUOTE]
Potatoes.

:lol: gav where do you get all these own pics they're hilarious :lol:
that kid is getting his face chewed off my a .....pelican or something lol

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]Potatoes.[/QUOTE]
WHERE!?

[QUOTE=I0Play0Bass]What are a, d, x and n? I assume by X you mean "multiplied by?"

To my knowledge, no, it has not been discovered. I'll do some research and try it with rational and irrational numbers.

:thumb:

-Gav[/QUOTE]

a=the first number in the sequence
d=the common differance in the sequence
x=multiply
n=the term number that you are trying to figure out.

the formula is to try and find a certen number in a sequence, so lets say that you have a sequence of 3, 6, 9 and you want to know the 18th number in the sequence you take the formula like this. n=the 18th number a=3 d=3. so you do this. n=3+(3x18) and you get 57 as the answer.

lowsound

[QUOTE=irishslappop]WHERE!?[/QUOTE]
Wintermutes Bra, go!

^ I'll do research...let me try it with pi.

Do you need a minimum of two terms? Also, does it only work with addition, or with subtraction, multiplication, division, etc.?

:thumb:

-Gav

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]Wintermutes Bra, go![/QUOTE]
oj jesus! i cant go alone who is joining me on this noble, dangerous task to recover the potatoes form the horrible bra of wintermute? will no one? are there none brave enough? common men! make haste with your decisions!

[QUOTE=I0Play0Bass]^ I'll do research...let me try it with pi.

Do you need a minimum of two terms? Also, does it only work with addition, or with subtraction, multiplication, division, etc.?

:thumb:

-Gav[/QUOTE]

only for arithmetic sequences, as in a sequence that goes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ect with the differance between number is constant, so adding or adding negitive number (subtracting)

lowsound

Have any of you ever had counseling?


Oh, I'm not afraid of Wintermute's bra.

[QUOTE=irishslappop]oj jesus! i cant go alone who is joining me on this noble, dangerous task to recover the potatoes form the horrible bra of wintermute? will no one? are there none brave enough? common men! make haste with your decisions![/QUOTE]
Me and my crew of imaginary pirates shall join, at the cost of your soul.

I'm tired. And hey...

[QUOTE=thelowsoundofbass]only for arithmetic sequences, as in a sequence that goes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ect with the differance between number is constant, so adding or adding negitive number (subtracting)

lowsound[/QUOTE]
i wonder if it works with trignometric funtions. or with double nad half angle formulas.

[QUOTE=irishslappop]oj jesus! i cant go alone who is joining me on this noble, dangerous task to recover the potatoes form the horrible bra of wintermute? will no one? are there none brave enough? common men! make haste with your decisions![/QUOTE]

im in, do i have to have pants on???

lowsound

0, 1, 2

You want to find the fourth.

n= 0 + (1*4)
n=4

OK, let's try:

3, 2, 1

You want to find the 4th term.

n=3+(1*4)
n=7

Doesn't work there. Let's try the negative difference (2-3 = -1)

n=3+(-4)
n=-1

Only works with steadily increasing integers...sorry. :upset:

:thumb:

-Gav

[QUOTE=thelowsoundofbass]im in, do i have to have pants on???

lowsound[/QUOTE]
:lol:

[QUOTE=irishslappop]i wonder if it works with trignometric funtions. or with double nad half angle formulas.[/QUOTE]

i don't know, i just came up with this like 40 minutes ago, tho me and gav will work on it.

lowsound

[QUOTE=Dieforitall89]Me and my crew of imaginary pirates shall join, at the cost of your soul.[/QUOTE]
you strike a hard bargin you do. the fellowship of the potatoes. me, my chupacabra, DFIA and his legion of non-exsistent pirates.

[QUOTE=I0Play0Bass]0, 1, 2

You want to find the fourth.

n= 0 + (1*4)
n=4

OK, let's try:

3, 2, 1

You want to find the 4th term.

n=3+(1*4)
n=7

Doesn't work there. Let's try the negative difference (2-3 = -1)

n=3+(-4)
n=-1

Only works with steadily increasing integers...sorry. :upset:

:thumb:

-Gav[/QUOTE]
Your having too much fun with this. :lol:

Wow. I'm glad to see noone cares about me.

Right...we start our quest tomorrow*is tempted to make a thread but holds it in* Right 1.2k posts and im out, later guys. :wave:

[QUOTE=thelowsoundofbass]im in, do i have to have pants on???

lowsound[/QUOTE]
i would prefer it but if you are unable to suit yourself with a pair of chain mail pants, you may still join this noble quest.

^ But it's still pretty cool. Almost as cool as my theory:

When you want to find the square of a number:

x^2 =(x-1)(x+1)+1

where x is the defined integer. Say the number is 2

2^2 = (2-1)(2+1) + 1

4 = (1)(3) + 1

4=4

Try it with any number...rational, irrational, pi, anything. It works.

I rule. I call it my lemma, or mini-theory.

:thumb:

-Gav

I love you, Paul.

Lowsound: Your theory would work with something like...summation or something.

:thumb:

-Gav