[QUOTE=Bron-Yr-Aur]Which is sort of what I was saying. Slightly. However, it does matter who and what caused them to break up, as it's a topic of interest. Kind of like JFK. It doesn't matter who killed him, he would've been dead soon anyway, right?[/QUOTE]
I guess....

I've found some good youtube videos that I would like to share haha. First theres the acoustic version of While My Guitar Gently Weeps for people who don't own the anthology...in which cause I demand you leave this thread go out and buy it and return.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NaYhroYSt8&search=George%20Harrison%20guitar[/url]

And much more interesting...

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NaYhroYSt8[/url]

The original mixes of Strawberry Fields forever...the two versions that were mixed to create the one masterpiece.

[QUOTE=run don't walk]It doesn't matter what/who caused them to disband because they would've broken up very soon after they actually did anyways. I mean say they didn't break up when they did could you really see the Beatles surving into the 70's etc?[/QUOTE]

I'm sure they'd still be battling the Rolling Stones for intergalactic rule.

[quote=El Goodo]The original mixes of Strawberry Fields forever...the two versions that were mixed to create the one masterpiece.[/quote]

That may very well have been the greatest thing I've seen today, only rivaled by the rooftop concert.

[quote=El Goodo]I'm sure they'd still be battling the Rolling Stones for intergalactic rule.[/quote]

Phff. The Beatles >>>>>>>> The Stones.

[QUOTE=El_Goodo]I'm sure they'd still be battling the Rolling Stones for intergalactic rule.[/QUOTE]
If all the Beatles were alive they'd destroy the Stones musically.

[QUOTE=Bron-Yr-Aur]

Phff. The Beatles >>>>>>>>[B]>[/B] The Stones.[/QUOTE]

Fixed :) ...I've gone made with fatigue.

[QUOTE]Phff. The Beatles >>>>>>>> The Stones.[/QUOTE]
Not quiet. You're getting closer though or something.
[QUOTE]If all the Beatles were alive they'd destroy the Stones.[/QUOTE]
If Brian Jones didn't die and if Mick Taylor never quit and if the Stones broke up in the '82 they'd destroy the Beatles even more. [I]If[/I].

[QUOTE=El_Goodo]Fixed :) ...I've gone made with fatigue.[/QUOTE]
Huh?:confused:

[QUOTE=Spat Out Plath]Their excellent solo careers are testament to this.

Everybody! Laaaaaaaaaaaaa, la de da![/QUOTE]
The Beatles would still have Lennon though. Sorry for the double post.

[quote]Not quiet. You're getting closer though or something.[/quote]

Nah, I think I got the premise down.

[quote]Their excellent solo careers are testament to this.[/quote]

Solo careers aside, if the Beatles were still a functioning unit, I think they'd be better than the Stones.

My personal opinion.

[quote]If Brian Jones didn't die and if Mick Taylor never quit and if the Stones broke up in the '82 they'd destroy the Beatles even more. If.[/quote]

To me, that theory is laughable, as I personally don't have much love for the Stones. It is however, your opinion, and no words of mine will change it, just as nothing you say will change mine.

[QUOTE=Jacaranda]Not quiet. You're getting closer though or something.

If Brian Jones didn't die and if Mick Taylor never quit and if the Stones broke up in the '82 they'd destroy the Beatles even more. [I]If[/I].[/QUOTE]

God damnit look what you people have gone and done...Jacaranda has returned to break our spirit with his Stones propaganda.

[QUOTE=Spat Out Plath]Their excellent solo careers are testament to this.

Everybody! Laaaaaaaaaaaaa, la de da![/QUOTE]

Band On The Run, All Things Must Pass, Imagine, and Ringorama are all better than Bridges to Babalon *has just discovered he can't spell babalon*

[QUOTE=run don't walk]The Beatles would still have Lennon though. Sorry for the double post.[/QUOTE]
Lennon wasn't the genius behind the Beatles. Sorry to burst your bubble.
[QUOTE]To me, that theory is laughable, as I personally don't have much love for the Stones. It is however, your opinion, and no words of mine will change it, just as nothing you say will change mine.[/QUOTE]
thxs 4 the update.

[QUOTE=Jacaranda]Lennon wasn't the genius behind the Beatles. Sorry to burst your bubble.[/QUOTE]
The Beatles would still beat the Stones .IMO

[quote]thxs 4 the update[/quote]

I like you.

[QUOTE=Bron-Yr-Aur]


To me, that theory is laughable, as I personally don't have much love for the Stones. It is however, your opinion, and no words of mine will change it, just as nothing you say will change mine.[/QUOTE]

I think what he was saying is that this is a moot topic, as no one could possibly predict with any sort of accuracy what the Beatles would've done had they not broken up.

[QUOTE=run don't walk]The Beatles would still beat The Stones .IMO[/QUOTE]
Well thats good but just remember to watch out for MTV cause they will brain wash you.
[QUOTE]I like you.[/QUOTE]
Ditto, no seriously.
[QUOTE]Band On The Run, All Things Must Pass, Imagine, and Ringorama are all better than Bridges to Babalon *has just discovered he can't spell babalon*[/QUOTE]
Too bad none of them are better then anything the Stones did in the early 70's or even [I]Some Girls[/I] and [I]Tattoo You[/I]. And I mean none, sorry George.

[QUOTE=Jacaranda] Too bad none of them are better then anything the Stones did in the early 70's or even [I]Some Girls[/I] and [I]Tattoo You[/I]. And I mean none, sorry George.[/QUOTE]

I like Some Girls! Beast Of Burden is my favourite Stones track...I mean! This is not a Rolling Stones thread damn you!

[QUOTE=Jacaranda]Well thats good but just remember to watch out for MTV cause they will brain wash you.
[/QUOTE]
I don't watch MTV.

[quote]Ditto, no seriously.[/quote]

Hurray for sarcasm.

[quote]Well thats good but just remember to watch out for MTV cause they will brain wash you.[/quote]

What exactly are you implying there?

[QUOTE=Bron-Yr-Aur]


What exactly are you implying there?[/QUOTE]
That's what I'm wondering too.

[url]http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=482412[/url]
[QUOTE]Hurray for sarcasm. [/QUOTE]
Ditto, no seriously.
[QUOTE]This is not a Rolling Stones thread damn you![/QUOTE]
Oh right sorry I didn't know this was a cream-all-over-anything-the-Beatles/john-ever-touched thread either.

I didn't even start it any way. :)

Ah. Yeah....

[QUOTE=Jacaranda][url]http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=482412[/url][/QUOTE]
:lol: I remember that thread.

That's what Jac does...always keeps you wondering...which is why I don't even bother argueing with him haha.

[QUOTE=Spat Out Plath]Name one Beatles solo album post-1973, excluding [I]Brainwashed[/I], that anyone could ever regard as a classic, or even good.[/QUOTE]

Maybe not classic but definitley good hmm;
Cloud 9
Chaos and Creation
Choose Love
Walls and Bridges
Rock N' Roll
Double Fantasy

Those are the ones i've heard.

[quote]Oh right sorry I didn't know this was a cream-all-over-anything-the-Beatles/john-ever-touched thread either.[/quote]

Rather malevolent fellow, aren't you?

[QUOTE=LeperMessiah]That's what Jac does...always keeps you wondering...which is why I don't even bother argueing with him haha.[/QUOTE]
or maybe its cause u love me?
nope
:upset:
[QUOTE]Rather malevolent fellow, aren't you?[/QUOTE]
Don't get me wrong I do like them. Just not as much as some people. Obviously...

[QUOTE=Jacaranda][url]http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=482412[/url]

Oh right sorry I didn't know this was a cream-all-over-anything-the-Beatles/john-ever-touched thread either.
[/QUOTE]

Well then we better change the name of this thread so people know what their in for!

Well hey look on the bright side the thread is alive now! Oh ya John's ego broke up the Beatles.
:evil:

[quote]Don't get me wrong I do like them. Just not as much as some people. Obviously...[/quote]

Kind of figured. I, however, am one of the people who regard them as genius, [i]obviously[/i].

[quote]John's ego broke up the Beatles[/quote]

Nah, John's ego belonged to Yoko by that time. That whole John/Yoko spiel was definitely a huge part of it.