Sputnik Music Forums

Sputnik Music Forums (http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/index.php)
-   Guitar (http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   lod (http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=573519)

Daily Routine 08-01-2010 10:54 PM

no problem man sorry these guys are diks

check this out too maybe this will help [url]http://www.brighthub.com/multimedia/audio/articles/5325.aspx[/url]

JoshIsNumber3 08-01-2010 11:52 PM

enjoy your phasing!

Kuffuffled 08-02-2010 12:42 AM

ilu

EmbraceRandom 08-02-2010 01:54 AM

Haas trick, always works with me for making a single guitar track sound bigger, fills the stereo image but only subtly. I think Dream Theater use it a lot, not very well though, their production sucks bum.

EDIT: tbh I usually use the Haas trick even if there's two guitars, makes them both sound obese

fingers mccoy 08-02-2010 02:46 AM

[QUOTE=viciouscycle;18109936]lmao I like how I am told to double track when I don't want to

I'll try those things thanks brosef

I've double tracked before I just don't want to with this one[/QUOTE]

wait.... aren't you trying to double track, just without playing it twice?

it will sound richer if you actually play it twice, no question.

of course you should be able to play it twice

it has nothing to do with your 'approach'. Not being able to repeat your successes is not an approach, it's just a deficiency.

it will help you get a clear picture of whatever you're trying to record as well.

jaklyons 08-02-2010 03:14 PM

poo

The_Mop 08-02-2010 04:09 PM

Sup bitches.

Sonisphere owned. Especially Rammstein and Gary Numan \m/

benfan 08-02-2010 04:26 PM

[QUOTE=The_Mop;18111004]Sup bitches.

Sonisphere owned. Especially Rammstein and Gary Numan \m/[/QUOTE]

Did the stages face each other again? I went last year.

Daily Routine 08-02-2010 04:37 PM

[QUOTE=fingers mccoy;18110151]
it has nothing to do with your 'approach'. Not being able to repeat your successes is not an approach, it's just a deficiency.

it will help you get a clear picture of whatever you're trying to record as well.[/QUOTE]

no this is honestly silly, it's a deficiency only in a particular regard depending upon your intention.

like what if the focal point of my music is not necessarily a particular sequence of notes and rhythms but more the way they are played LIKE A WHOLE FUKING SH[COLOR="Black"]IT[/COLOR] LOAD OF MUSIC[I] IS[/I]

fuking try to tell me that cannonball was ever interested in repeating his sax parts in facsimile

GuitarBizarre 08-02-2010 04:46 PM

[QUOTE=Booger Tits;18111051]no this is honestly silly, it's a deficiency only in a particular regard depending upon your intention.

like what if the focal point of my music is not necessarily a particular sequence of notes and rhythms but more the way they are played LIKE A WHOLE FUKING SH[COLOR="Black"]IT[/COLOR] LOAD OF MUSIC[I] IS[/I]

fuking try to tell me that cannonball was ever interested in repeating his sax parts in facsimile[/QUOTE]

He wants to make a single track sound bigger, the best way to do that is to doubletrack it. Thats how it works. If you can't record the same thing twice, then you should have a big enough sound to begin with, or you should change it so you CAN play it twice and then doubletrack it.

Almost any other approach introduces phasing, which is bad mmkay?

Daily Routine 08-02-2010 04:57 PM

[QUOTE=GuitarBizarre;18111066]He wants to make a [B]single track[/B] sound bigger, the best way to do that is to [B]doubletrack[/B] it. [/QUOTE]

i'll let you figure our y ur dum

Kuffuffled 08-02-2010 05:14 PM

I want this song to have a vintage sort of feel to it

I COULD learn to play all my fills and **** exactly the same twice but I don't want to

There's no one way of doing things guise common

The_Mop 08-02-2010 06:23 PM

[quote=benfan;18111033]Did the stages face each other again? I went last year.[/quote]

Yeah, they were facing each other.

fingers mccoy 08-02-2010 07:18 PM

[QUOTE=Booger Tits;18111051]no this is honestly silly, it's a deficiency only in a particular regard depending upon your intention.

like what if the focal point of my music is not necessarily a particular sequence of notes and rhythms but more the way they are played LIKE A WHOLE FUKING SH[COLOR="Black"]IT[/COLOR] LOAD OF MUSIC[I] IS[/I]

fuking try to tell me that cannonball was ever interested in repeating his sax parts in facsimile[/QUOTE]

he was.

you mean cannonball adderley?

of course he was.

spirit 08-02-2010 07:40 PM

[QUOTE=Booger Tits;18111090]i'll let you figure our y ur dum[/QUOTE]

He mis-spoke, or rather mis-typed. You're being deliberately obtuse. Either you know exactly what he meant, or you're an idiot, but let me put it as it should have been for you.

[quote]
He wants to make a single [b]part[/b] sound bigger, the best way to do that is to doubletrack it.[/quote]

Blue_Moon 08-02-2010 07:45 PM

aux the balls off of it ^^

+ compressors

El-Ahrairah 08-03-2010 01:11 AM

[QUOTE=viciouscycle;18111131]I want this song to have a vintage sort of feel to it

I COULD learn to play all my fills and **** exactly the same twice but I don't want to

There's no one way of doing things guise common[/QUOTE]

you could always play two different tracks and pan them left and right, Turbonegro and The Hellacopters do that a lot, often with a "solo" track (during the whole song :lol:) and a more rhythmic one.

benfan 08-03-2010 03:10 AM

[QUOTE=The_Mop;18111243]Yeah, they were facing each other.[/QUOTE]

How did you find it? last year i liked how the times were staggered, but it was kind of annoying that all the stalls were in the middle between the stages.

fingers mccoy 08-03-2010 03:18 AM

[QUOTE=viciouscycle;18111131]I want this song to have a vintage sort of feel to it

I COULD learn to play all my fills and **** exactly the same twice but I don't want to

There's no one way of doing things guise common[/QUOTE]

replay the part, do whatever fills you want. It'll still sound good as long as you don't fiddle around too much. you don't want clashes or unprecedented and disruptive crossrhythm.

purple_hazer 08-03-2010 11:15 AM

tbf though, cannonball probably wouldve liked to know all his solos and play them note for note, but im almost certain he didnt go out of his way to figure them out. he most likely just had a loose idea of what he was doin and would rip it up

The_Mop 08-03-2010 01:25 PM

[QUOTE=benfan;18112050]How did you find it? last year i liked how the times were staggered, but it was kind of annoying that all the stalls were in the middle between the stages.[/QUOTE]

Tbh, I thought it was a pretty good setup - not as massive as download, pretty manageable. Getting to the smaller stages was a bit weird though, behind that massive block of stalls... was it the same last year?

Should have gone last year really, seeing NIN would have been ace.... but it would have been the 6th time I will have seen them :P

Sorry that last reply was so short, was just so knackered :lol: got some sorta flu **** today for some reason...

EDIT: Just remembered, after seeing tim minchin at sonisphere, periphery came on over the PA... had to explain to my girlfriend :P Also some awesome bastard decided to put a whole set of zappa tunes on while waiting for Alice in Chains \m/

purple_hazer 08-03-2010 01:40 PM

damn zappa on the PA trumps any 'bridge' tunes

Left Face Down 08-03-2010 04:00 PM

What is every one's opinion on Midi?


I keep going back to the Mesa/Boogie Mark V, but I have run across some Midi capable (or with it built in) amps. It is interesting, as I like having multiple channels for the fact I can set multiple sounds. Though Midi either has evolved, or isn't exactly what I thought it was. It isn't really digitally made sound, as it is just digital controls for things making the sound.

The Hughes & Kettner Switchblade and Carvin Legacy II have caught my attention. From the videos I've seen I really don't dig the sound of the H&K, but the Legacy II I do dig a little. I believe a Midi footswitch (i.e. using the Midi capabilities) with the Legacy II will solve my only gripe; channels sharing controls. If I can set up a clean, create a patch, then switch around the controls to make a light distortion, create a patch, and still have the amp essentially internally revert back to the Low/Mid/High settings I had when I set the patch then I'd be cool with the whole sharing controls.


Only slight downfall, well not with the H&K, is that Amp + Midi footswitch basically costs as much as the Boogie Mark V does anyways.

JoshIsNumber3 08-03-2010 05:09 PM

boy thats interesting do go on

benfan 08-03-2010 05:37 PM

[QUOTE=The_Mop;18112623]Tbh, I thought it was a pretty good setup - not as massive as download, pretty manageable. Getting to the smaller stages was a bit weird though, behind that massive block of stalls... was it the same last year?

Should have gone last year really, seeing NIN would have been ace.... but it would have been the 6th time I will have seen them :P

Sorry that last reply was so short, was just so knackered :lol: got some sorta flu **** today for some reason...

EDIT: Just remembered, after seeing tim minchin at sonisphere, periphery came on over the PA... had to explain to my girlfriend :P Also some awesome bastard decided to put a whole set of zappa tunes on while waiting for Alice in Chains \m/[/QUOTE]


Yeah it sounds pretty much the same. Sylosis were probably the best bands along with Tallica and Linkin Park (lol).
Thats wicked about Periphery on the PA.

AG 08-05-2010 01:08 PM

Sloooooow down lod, you're moving too fast!

GuitarBizarre 08-05-2010 01:52 PM

[quote=ag;18116583]sloooooow down lod, you're moving too fast![/quote]

lies

purple_hazer 08-06-2010 02:11 AM

[QUOTE=AG;18116583]Sloooooow down lod, you're moving too fast![/QUOTE]

gg at jj ref.

Kuffuffled 08-06-2010 03:07 AM

[url]www.soundcloud.com/viciouscycle[/url]

Sad But True 08-06-2010 05:32 AM

Hangover > me.


That is all.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.