4:33

I don't care for John Cage's antics.

4:33.

i remember reading something in music class last year about some guy (a) tried to sue some other guy (b) because (b) released a song with silence and (a) also had a song with silence and there was a lawsuit over copyright infringement

Obviously American.

[QUOTE=Aaron;17087735]Selkies by BTBAM has nice guitarssz.[/QUOTE]

selkies has mad sweeps but not much tapping

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkGsQJoszG8[/url]
this is good non cheesy tapping

What a joke. You can't copyright silence. People are disgustingly stupid sometimes.

Well what the statement is that the listening is the important part, not what you hear. So F U ALL!

[url]http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=-3836028903720909213&ei=H7COSYi0HYnKwgPissGKBg&q=maps+and+altases+&hl=en[/url]
this guy is also awesome and non cheesy

Man our fielders just can't hit the stumps tonight.

lol cricket.

we gonna lose the ashes fo sho

England v Australia will be interesting to watch. I'd love us to bowl them out for 51 like the West Indies did yesterday haha.

And now it looks like New Zealand have every chance of a win, requiring 70 off 54.

Yep, I told you.

On another note, coming from a senior lecturer at ANU (from the mathematics department!),
[quote]Theoretical computer science is the most interesting subject there is.[/quote]

So there you have it.

[QUOTE=big80smullet;17087779]selkies has mad sweeps but not much tapping

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkGsQJoszG8[/url]
this is good non cheesy tapping[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqIxpZYSpK4&feature=related[/url]

probs the only band that could top Dillinger in crazyness.

Frantic drummer but the audio quality is so bad you can't really hear much of anything.

i dunno hey. dillinger are pretty wierd but theyre also kinda clinical.

gogol bordello are just plain nuts

oh man im all sweaty from playing air guitar

\m/

[url]http://sloths.us/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/sloth_in_a_box.jpg[/url]

[QUOTE=Aaron;17087815][url]http://sloths.us/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/sloth_in_a_box.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]

It certainly delivers what it promises.

Woooo.

Good game Australia.

Edit: If New Zealand won, would Adelaide have been played?

[QUOTE=gaslight;17087819]It certainly delivers what it promises.[/QUOTE]

chinglish lol. you don't trust links I post do you.

[QUOTE=gaslight;17087819]It certainly delivers what it promises.[/QUOTE]

chinglish lol. you don't trust links I post do you.

Everyone go to this: [url]http://www.moshtix.com.au/Event.aspx?id=24677&pLock=&vip=&skin=&ref=[/url]

[QUOTE=Chu;17087823]Woooo.

Good game Australia.

Edit: If New Zealand won, would Adelaide have been played?[/QUOTE]

Yeah, even if a series is done and dusted they still tend to play all the games. Otherwise you'd lose money on TV deals and sponsorships and tickets and all that.

You can have a 5-0 series result.

or maybe Aaron you should go to soundwave

Bags not buying a ticket to that.

We need to prove climate change.

This is my theory - slightly edited from my chat with Aaron:
Basically, the damage to our atmosphere means more of the sun's solar winds get through, which means a bigger discrepancy in temperature.

Our iron core basically prevents the solar winds from destroying our atmosphere (Mars doesn't have an iron core; as a result its atmosphere is non-existent these days) - The magnetosphere doesn't save the entire atmosphere, indeed we lose some every time winds come past, but it does protect most of it, but we are doing the exact opposite (a lot like Venus actually) and destroying our atmosphere from inside - effectively increasing the speed our atmosphere deteriorates.

This is all assumption, and the results of it, I haven't quite worked out, but yeah, that's basically it.
Prove, or disprove please.

I don't think climate change can be disproven.

Climate does change, that's how the planet works, the climate has changed significantly many times over the course of the planet's existence.

I don't know why people talk about it as it if it just emerged out of nowhere all of a sudden.

I think the main gripe with climate change is that the way the planet is changing is counter-productive to human habitation. Humans think they're the be all and end all of life on the planet.

Most definitely, naturally the climate will change.

However, what we are experiencing now, is definitely not natural climate change.

It's because we are such a disposable society (the whole world), and any change to our productions would disrupt this, and people are oh so ****ing lovey dovey about their mother ****ing materialistic possessions, as long as they have them, they are completely fine.

Honestly I think a significant human depopulation is the only way the species and the planet will get along together.

[QUOTE=Chu;17087879]Most definitely, naturally the climate will change.

However, what we are experiencing now, is definitely not natural climate change.

It's because we are such a disposable society (the whole world), and any change to our productions would disrupt this, and people are oh so ****ing lovey dovey about their mother ****ing materialistic possessions, as long as they have them, they are completely fine.[/QUOTE]

the last ice age was only around 10,000 years ago. Its generally accepted that its around a 100k year cycle so theoretically we have something like 40k years of heating left.

Also i dont trust any scientist who works for a company that is dependent on climate change research for income because they have ulterior motives. I trust proffessors who work for universities because it doesnt matter what they say, and many of them have said that climate change is inexorable and not man made only slightly man accelerated

Unless they're a professor whose tenure depends on not stepping too far out of line.

But yeah, I agree about climate change being a natural thing that is being exacerbated by human activity. I'm not convinced much can be done to help it while maintaining the size of the population either.

I read a study which said anything we did now to prevent climate change, wouldn't have any effect for at least 100k years.

It is for this reason I guess most people will choose to deny it (we can't change what's going to happen), I personally see that as a pretty selfish view though.