I always get that argument about not liking people who do it, but it's like anything. The same happens with alcohol, food, wanking off to anime, WHATEVER!

It's not so much the actual weed that turns people weird, it's the mental dependence on something. I think it's stupid to smoke before you're 18, your personality is really blossoming then and often kids end up devoid of a personality because they didn't give themselves an opportunity to develop one.

So in my mind, it's complex. You have to consider age a lot.

pasta i think people frown on wanking off to anime just as much as they do smoking weed

Even moreso in the case of furries

oh man i got hit with a double whammy of frowning then

i just love it when a chair sprouts fuc[size=2]k[/size]-tentacles and does the teacher

Man, anime is weird.

oh man i got hit with a double whammy of frowning then

i just love it when a chair sprouts fuc[size=2]k[/size]-tentacles and does the teacher

Man, anime is weird.

Pastorius you high now ?

I've never done weed although I'm open to any sort of drug apart from heroin.

But I've done E and that was a pretty good experience.

Ive never done any drugs, and i don't really want to, i don't really have anything against them, just something that doesn't interest me, id rather just get drunk.

[QUOTE=Untitled;14971520]Ive never done any drugs, and i don't really want to, i don't really have anything against them, just something that doesn't interest me, id rather just get drunk.[/QUOTE]
this.

i have friends that smoke weed, and it doesn't bother me, but id never consider doing it myself.

I had quite a big pot stage a few years back, I still smoke now and then, maybe a few times a year. Mainly at a party if theres some about or if a mate fancies making a day of it or something.

I've done a few other things too, theyre fun at the time but none of them interest me any more.

Im not fussed whether people want to use drugs. its their choice.

I would never stop hanging around with someone if they were doing drugs. It's their choice.

Just seen the new Harry Potter. Thought it was the best one yet even though they did omit some important stuff.

We went to the cinema today.

We went up to the box office and said "when is transformers on today?" and they said "its not out for another two weeks" we went :o then played on the arcade for a short while, then went and wandered around manchester aimlessly.

They wanted to go watch harry potter, i told them im not, so they didn't, even though i said i had no problem with them going in and me going home, but they didnt.

[QUOTE=Untitled;14972909]We went to the cinema today.

We went up to the box office and said "when is transformers on today?" and they said "its not out for another two weeks" we went :o then played on the arcade for a short while, then went and wandered around manchester aimlessly.

They wanted to go watch harry potter, i told them im not, so they didn't, even though i said i had no problem with them going in and me going home, but they didnt.[/QUOTE]

I'm supposed to go with some mates sometime whenever that stupid movie comes out. It's supposed to actually be amazing, and much more like War movie than Transformers.

I was mega hyped for it when i saw the teaser trailer months and months ago, then i realised it would probably suck.

I saw die hard 4 the other day and there was a transformers trailer on, it looked better than i thought it would.

What my thoughts on transformers is, that its going to look really good and pretty, but the actual film will be pretty week, but i still want to see it.

I wanna see the Simpsons movie.
it's gonna be such a let down but I'm still interested.

I think they missed the boat with it really.

I'm gonna make a point of never seeing the Simpsons movie. Ever.

Apparently Transformers is amazing. And the simpsons movie looks good, even though I don't think any of the trailers so far have anything to do with the film itself

Squirrel: not if it's any good. The idea behind how they worked it is that it's to be as good as the simpsons were at their best. They got the old producers and directors in, and rehired the best writers, all from the 'golden age'. In order to keep the simpsons fresh they decided upon a system where noone would work for them for more than 3 series or so. But everyone that's coming in nowadays isn't really of the pedigree that the old writers were, they aren't that good, and the latest producer has pretty much just sat back and let the writers do whatever, so it's turned into a meandering, 'random', unstructered and predictably 'goofy' program.

The people on the movie worked for the Simpsons when it was awesome

Yeah i knew that.

But for the majority that dont know that and are bored of the simpsons, they wont go see the film.

Old writers you say ?

Hmmm now I'm interested.

Of course they will, The Simpsons is everywhere.

Even if they don't, does it matter? Millions of people love the simpsons

Yeh man im jus sayin.

Just so you know, I wasn't high when I was posting earlier!

Here's a question:

Do you consider alcohol a drug?

Yes, because it is.

Of course it is.
/late

Well, a lot of people don't. You consider it a drug, but I'm willing to bet you don't put it in the same category as say, weed or ecstasy. I'm just interested to know what creates that boundary. The law, obviously, but disregarding that, what's the difference?

What about caffeine?

Caffeine isn't exactly the same strength as ecstasy.

I know, but do you consider it a drug?

Ecstasy isn't exactly the same strength as heroin, but you still consider it a drug. Can't use that argument.

Yes, because once again, it is a drug.

OK, so you consider it a drug.

Do you consider someone who is drinking coffee to be taking drugs?

I consider them to be taking caffeine, which is a drug.