[QUOTE=Mankind_]Queen w/o Freddie Mercury
Aerosmith w/o Steven Tyler
Bon Jovi w/o Bon Jovi
[B]The Doors w/o Jim Morrison[/B][/QUOTE]
one step ahead of ya, bro

Guns 'n Roses w/o Axl Rose

Edit: naw, maybe not... Then again, it was Axl's attitude that was a big part of GnR, so yea

[QUOTE=Mankind_]one step ahead of ya, bro[/QUOTE]

Yea I know I edited the previous post. I lose again....

Journey w/o Steve Perry...i guess. is the singer thats with them now any good?

Bob Seger is the single most underatted Singer in the histroy of rock and roll.


[QUOTE=badmoon349]Not true, they are still quite a band ;)[/QUOTE]

They wouldn't be half as popular though. Still a good listen I bet :)

[QUOTE=Mankind_]Guns 'n Roses w/o Axl Rose

Edit: naw, maybe not... Then again, it was Axl's attitude that was a big part of GnR, so yea[/QUOTE]

Slash.

[QUOTE=rock not roll]Bob Seger is the single most underatted Singer in the histroy of rock and roll.QUOTE]

Underatted singer, but overatted songwriter to me.

[QUOTE=rock not roll]Slash.[/QUOTE]
yea, him too.

Nirvana w/o Kurt?

[QUOTE=Woodstock][QUOTE=rock not roll]Bob Seger is the single most underatted Singer in the histroy of rock and roll.QUOTE]

Underatted singer, but overatted songwriter to me.[/QUOTE]

Get out of my thread.

:p Joking.

He's a brilliant song writer and even better entertainer.

[QUOTE=Mankind_]yea, him too.

Nirvana w/o Kurt?[/QUOTE]

Yeah.

Classic Rock Thread w/o Badmoon

Lots of bands = just not the same no matter who you take out.

p.s Styx = Okay.

Anybody got any albums to trade? I'm bored.

^Omgz l0l, ilegal lol, im telin da cop on u!1!

[QUOTE=badmoon349]Yeah.

Classic Rock Thread w/ Badmoon[/QUOTE]

2 tr00.

Classic rock thread without rock not roll too. I don't think you can have a huge thread without 500 spam posts from one person :D

[QUOTE=badmoon349]Anybody got any albums to trade? I'm bored.[/QUOTE]
I don't even have AIM. I'm listening to a good album though.

sorry to go off topic, but anyone here have that "History Of Rock 'N Roll" dvd that costs, like, $80? if so, is it worth the cash?

get it! It's free!

EDIT: To Rocknroll

[QUOTE=badmoon349]get it! It's free![/QUOTE]
huh :confused:

[QUOTE=badmoon349]get it! It's free![/QUOTE]
ugh, not now, I'm too tired. I already have msn and yahoo(even though I have no contacts on yahoo).

oh. thought you were talking about the dvd...heh

Hey side note we finally wrote lyrics to our first song(yay)[my band]. We also recorded (video) a bunch of stuff we play, it was cool.

[QUOTE=Mankind_]oh. thought you were talking about the dvd...heh[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I heard about it. Doesnt look worth the money, not endorsed by any bands so no real stuff.

I thought the History of Rock N' Roll Dvd might be cool, but then I thought it would probably be just the most popular stuff about the popular bands in rock history. So that seems like it would be sort of cool, but probably not 80$ cool.

The Who w/o Pete Townshend.

I was trying to think of The Beatles, but removing one member wouldn't honestly change much except you'd no longer have their type of song that they wrote. Now to me, that's a great band.

[QUOTE=Seafroggys]The Who w/o Pete Townshend.

I was trying to think of The Beatles, but removing one member wouldn't honestly change much except you'd no longer have their type of song that they wrote. Now to me, that's a great band.[/QUOTE]
I knew the Beatles were invincible to the question :)

I wish there were modern music classes in school. Just not in such away that you've got your rock 101 class bursting at the seems. Something like the history of modern music (jazz, blues, soul, funk, rock, country, etc... ) and it would talk about how they all came to be and what they are.

I don't know, if you took anyone away from The Who they wouldn't be the same at all. So it's hard to single out just Pete.

[QUOTE=Seafroggys]The Who w/o Pete Townshend.

I was trying to think of The Beatles, but removing one member wouldn't honestly change much except you'd no longer have their type of song that they wrote. Now to me, that's a great band.[/QUOTE]
I actually beleive the beatles without lennon would be nowhere near what they were. I beleive he represented best the ideals that were an essential part of the group.

[QUOTE=RockAndRoll]I actually beleive the beatles without lennon would be nowhere near what they were. I beleive he represented best the ideals that were an essential part of the group.[/QUOTE]
123
i especially like george harrison's work tho

[QUOTE=Mankind_]123
i especially like george harrison's work tho[/QUOTE]
I beleive the others were great musicians and songwriters, but it just would not be the same, they would not be remember in near the same way they are now if it were not for lennon.

eck. just read that ernie ball died in a thread in the guitar forum