naw^

[QUOTE=Livewired]naw^[/QUOTE]

Maybe my link could interest you more....

[QUOTE=badmoon349]Rock, you want to finish the album now?[/QUOTE]

sure.

I have made a conclusion: Music isn't as important today as it was in the 60's.

Does not apply to us, but why do you think this has happened?

Most of my friends couldn't care less about music.

[QUOTE=Woodstock]I have made a conclusion: Music isn't as important today as it was in the 60's.

Does not apply to us, but why do you think this has happened?

Most of my friends couldn't care less about music.[/QUOTE]

We finished that arguement about 5000 posts ago. But you did a nice job of suming it up.

No, this has never been asked.

Howcome this thread isn't very active when im on but when im not on

BAM! 12 new pages that i have to read.

You didnt miss much......I still dont know what time we are doing that thing tommorow

Like half an hour ago. exept tomorrow.

8:30 Eastern time I guess

[QUOTE=Paranoidd]None of y'all use MSN?[/QUOTE]
I use it.

Oh ya I think the Debate is a good Idea.

So who is in the debate thing? Zeppelin vs. The Who, it should be interesting.

I don't know which one I like better. I'll debate for both sides.

You'll probably have to go Zeppelin because I think most of the regulars prefer The Who.

I am a Master Debater.

/lame. :upset:

Stick to "master debating" away from the computer.

I'd go with Zeppelin. I'm not a big fan of the Who. I like the Guess Who much better.

Anyway.....

Who vs Zeppelin?

Whos going on what sides?

and lunch i like your user title

I'm not sure which side I'm on. I'll go with either.

[QUOTE=lunch998]You'll probably have to go Zeppelin because I think most of the regulars prefer The Who.[/QUOTE]

No.

I actually think we should debate many things. Why should we argue, Led Zeppelin and the who for an hour? Why not many topics?

So far its Me, Rock not Roll, Malcom, and Miik. I can go either, depending on which side needs more people.

Ok first off...its tomorrow... at what time?

[QUOTE=rock not roll]No.

I actually think we should debate many things. Why should we argue, Led Zeppelin and the who for an hour? Why not many topics?[/QUOTE]

Well cause thats what we do in the forum usually. It was Badmoons idea to have 2 bands against each other.

Where is Badmoon he should be organizing this. It was his idea.

[QUOTE=rock not roll]No.

I actually think we should debate many things. Why should we argue, Led Zeppelin and the who for an hour? Why not many topics?[/QUOTE]

Me and Badmoon were starting this last nite when nobody else was on. The point is to have a debate between two groups, and you argue why one band is better.

Well why not debate 2 other bands after we debate Zeppelni and the who?


I don't even want to have that debate. Music is a matter of opinon, you can't try to prove which one is better because everyone has a different music taste.

Maybe after a little bit we'll switch to 2 other groups.

[QUOTE=MalcolmYoungRock]Ok first off...its tomorrow... at what time?[/QUOTE]
ack, tommorow is not good.

Oh. Well...

I'll go on whatever side needs another person.

[QUOTE=RockAndRoll]ack, tommorow is not good.[/QUOTE]

How about a mini debate right now?

Everybody is on AIM right now I assume...

Tomorrow is the Aim album-trade so we should try it another time.

i guess i can do it... dont have AIM tho, but i can get it. *groan* that means ill have to wake up at 8AM. Ill just sit in, but i dont mind argueing for Zeppelin.

DVG.

[QUOTE=MalcolmYoungRock]How about a mini debate right now?

Everybody is on AIM right now I assume...[/QUOTE]

I can't, I've been avoiding my homework as usual. It's almost 10 on the east coast too, so I should go do that.

If anyone wants to talk to me on Aim, my screen name is lunch998.

Augh, everybody I know holds off their homework.

I do it first thing :thumb:.

Then again, my parents force me too....

So have I made my point? Or are we still going to debate a pointless arguement?

Why not debate which one had more influence or more talent? Not which one is better?

[QUOTE=rock not roll]So have I made my point? Or are we still going to debate a pointless arguement?

Why not debate which one had more influence or more talent? Not which one is better?[/QUOTE]
That is a good idea...

I think what we should do is we should do one of those band vs band things.

Once we go to the point where we can't debate any longer about a band we pick a winner then get a new band.

Something like that..

Edit: Or we can also do it like that

Debate on 2 bands and which had the most influence and then we move on to another band to debate with the band that won or had the "most influence"

[QUOTE=rock not roll]So have I made my point? Or are we still going to debate a pointless arguement?

Why not debate which one had more influence or more talent? Not which one is better?[/QUOTE]

The point of debating it with members of this forum is to get intelligent responses about influence and talent, not have people say "Zeppelin is better because Jimmy Page Rules!"

[QUOTE=lunch998]The point of debating it with members of this forum is to get intelligent responses about influence and talent, not have people say "Zeppelin is better because Jimmy Page Rules!"[/QUOTE]


That's why I'm so horribly thankful that few noobs have found their way into this thread.