Not quite sure. It's usually up to mod discretion. At least a week or more.

You know, asking to be banned might not be such a bad idea. MX is getting in the way of my schoolwork, I need to buckle down for these next few weeks, until winter break.

Griff, ban me 'til the 9th.

Edit: Can I still participate in the Christmas Contest if I'm banned?

I can do it until the 10th or 7th.

[QUOTE=obese_breasts]I can do it until the 10th or 7th.[/QUOTE]

Nevermind, I'd like to participate in the Christmas Contest. Can I still partake if I'm banned?

Is there like a "BAN" button beside my name?

No, you have to go into the ModCP and type in the name of the person you wish to ban and select a length.

[QUOTE=obese_breasts]No, you have to go into the ModCP and type in the name of the person you wish to ban and select a length.[/QUOTE]

Fascinating, well I'm going to bed.

'Night MX.

I'm gonna see GWAR on tuesday.

rock!

I am seeing Against Me! tonight. :)

bastard!!! that was to the last 2 posts

6500 posts

You're one off.

1717 posts! What a cool number. Which, incidentally is the year in which Bishop Benjamin Hoadly, acting on the advice of King George, began the Bangorian Controversy by saying that God favours churches with no government.

[QUOTE=coheneran]1717 posts! What a cool number. Which, incidentally is the year in which Bishop Benjamin Hoadly, acting on the advice of King George, began the Bangorian Controversy by saying that God favours churches with no government.[/QUOTE]

How incredibly uninteresting.

[QUOTE=TakeWarning]How incredibly uninteresting.[/QUOTE]

It was a very boring year. I looked it up on wikipedia because I had nothing better to do than to bring pointless sources into my post. It was the most interesting thing in 1717. Unless you count the first ballet ever to be performed in England interesting.

[QUOTE=DrGolovaCroxby]I'm gonna see GWAR on tuesday.

rock![/QUOTE]

Mad cool. That'll be awesome.

Why is it that nearly every celebrity (in Britain anyway) has done some sort of work or advert for UNICEF or some other organisation working against poverty and/or HIV/AIDS, but I've never seen ONE politician really put his face out there to show support?

Politicians don't really seem to care about anything but their paychecks.

Well, these celebrities (in this case, Bex and Robbie Williams) don't have a very notorious life of charity purely for charity, if you now what I mean. But they seem to know their stuff about AIDS in Afrika (that's right, I've started to spell it the cool way)and Beckham didn't sound stupid and said some intelligent(ish) things.

A lot of celebrities only do that stuff because it gives them more celebrity.

I know. But wouldn't politicians want it even more? I mean, a celebrity is a celebrity, whether or not people like or dislike him. A politician is nothing if no one supports him.

What ever happened to your Crass thread Coheneran?

Oh yes. I'm still thinking of a funny name.

You guys have to check this out

[url]http://usofungodly.ytmnd.com/[/url]

Heard you the first time.

[QUOTE=chairman_of_the_board]Heard you the first time.[/QUOTE]

Not my fault. Ghey laggy MX.

>.>

lolololololololololol

There's a show on Channel4 now called Death By Sex. At first I thought this is some show that may have good wanking bits. Boy was I wrong. It's about weird couples who strangle each other for a "heightened orgasmic sensation" and some of them end up killing their partner. Two questions:

1) Have you heard of this?
2) Have you done this?

[QUOTE=coheneran]There's a show on Channel4 now called Death By Sex. At first I thought this is some show that may have good wanking bits. Boy was I wrong. It's about weird couples who strangle each other for a "heightened orgasmic sensation" and some of them end up killing their partner. Two questions:

1) Have you heard of this?
2) Have you done this?[/QUOTE]

How the hell does that "heighten orgasmic sensation"? :confused:

Something to do with constricting blood oxygen to the brain. I switched it off, it got boring. And disturbing. I'm a very impressionable youth and I didn't want it putting any ideas in my head.

Ninja EDIT: That was my sister, she's gone now. That's a lesson for you, don't leave a half-written post when you go for a piss. I won't delete it because it's funny.

I've heard of that.

What have you heard of it?

[QUOTE=DaveToopes]I've heard of that.[/QUOTE]

Who gets the heightened orgasm? The person being choked?

Yeah, the person being choked. Sometimes they pass out.

[QUOTE=coheneran]1717 posts! What a cool number. Which, incidentally is the year in which Bishop Benjamin Hoadly, acting on the advice of King George, began the Bangorian Controversy by saying that God favours churches with no government.[/QUOTE]

*slow clap*

[QUOTE=SkaBandit]Who gets the heightened orgasm? The person being choked?[/QUOTE]

Yeah. That's all I have heard about it. Just that limiting the oxygen you recieve during and before an orgasm makes it more intense.

Lol, this is hilarious, but kinda sick:
[url]http://standup.ebaumsworld.com/richguzzi-video.html[/url]

There's something on the news about a new legal battle in America about abortion. Some pro-life dude said "There's an uprising of young people who want to see the new generations have life, not death." I say, you want to show non-existent generations a good life, fix the world.

Autoerotic afixiation is worse than choking your own partner, because when they find your corpse's cold hand clutching your limp **** hung from a closet door, they'll laugh.

[QUOTE=Brain Toad]Autoerotic afixiation is worse than choking your own partner, because when they find your corpse's cold hand clutching your limp **** hung from a closet door, they'll laugh.[/QUOTE]I once watched a sweet movie about a guy who tried to kill himself and he was in his boxers, and his parents found him because he was in their house (long story) and they thought he was into the autoerotic afixiation.

Lol. Did anyone watch the link I posted?