I learned Something on harmonica this afternoon. It sounds wierd, but pretty good. Come Together is really fun to play on harmonica.

[url]http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=10267999#post10267999[/url]

Check out my Hide Your Love Away cover...and or Oh Sister (Bob Dylan) cover. If you have some time to waste. :) Anycomments please post in that thread.

[QUOTE]Originally Posted by [B]robo2448[/B]
[I]I learned Something on harmonica this afternoon. It sounds wierd, but pretty good. Come Together is really fun to play on harmonica[/I].[/QUOTE]
I wish I knew how to play the harmonica.

Playing live shows would definitely be fun, but I would definitely thrive on working in the studio. I love the concept of experimentation which the studio allows you to do. I don't think I'd find many things more fun than tinkering with my songs until I thought they were perfect.

EDIT: Two "definitely's" in one sentence really hammers the point home doesn't it?:p

I think I would greatly enjoy both, depending on what style of music I played. The thought of jamming live in a Cream sense really sounds awesome, but experimenting in the studio the way the Beatles did with their later stuff fascinates me.

[QUOTE=magicbus]I think I would greatly enjoy both, depending on what style of music I played. The thought of jamming live in a Cream sense really sounds awesome, but experimenting in the studio the way the Beatles did with their later stuff fascinates me.[/QUOTE]

123

It would be very interesting. Performing is fun but experimenting in the studios like The Beatles would be awesome.

[QUOTE=guitrguy]Sad thing is the second disc always falls out of my rotation, but Sexie Sadie is awesome.[/QUOTE]


Ya same here man.The full White album is so trippy...it just seems to go up and down and all around different muscial genres.Just listen to "Goodnight" or "Cry baby cry".Brilliant.

Number 9. Number 9. Number 9. Number 9.

That song seriously creeped me out the first time I listened to it all the way through. I wanted to turn it off so many times but forced myself not to.

The white album is incredible.

Did ya'll know that Paul played drums on Back in U.S.S.R?

I actually did know that. One of my favourite comments regarding that instance:

Journalist: John, is Ringo the best drummer in the world?
John: Ringo isn't even the best drummer in the band.

b-b-burn!

Ringo did kinda suck...

but he fit in good

Haha. Yeah I read that somewhere.

Meh I really don't know much about drumming so I can't even really comment on his skill. I wouldn't have it any other way than John, Paul, George and Ringo though.

Yeah.

So Paul was the better drummer? Right?

Amen

now who was it who asked such a dumb question?

What?

I meant who was it that asked if ringo was the best drummer?

[QUOTE]So Paul was the better drummer? Right?[/QUOTE]

Yes.

[QUOTE]now who was it who asked such a dumb question?[/QUOTE]

I dunno exactly. Some star-struck journalist I suppose.

Man, what's with all the Ringo bashing? He may not be the best drummer of all time, but he's still was the one of the best of that time frame.

No He's not

[QUOTE=Britton]No He's not[/QUOTE]

Could you imagine if The Beatles kept Pete Best?

I could imagine a lot of lame jokes involving his last name would show up.

[QUOTE=Magical_Mystery_Tour]but he's still was the one of the best of that time frame.[/QUOTE]

I'll gave you that until 1966 (maybe). Because then Baker and Moon showed up on the scene.

What about bonham?

He was good but never anywhere near the best ask
any drummer in the world and they'll tell you that

Led Zeppelin didn't form until 1968, so I wouldn't count him until then.

No matter what you say, he's been extremely successful, and also proves you don't have to be a virtuoso to be in one of the biggest bands ever.

[QUOTE=Lunch]Led Zeppelin didn't form until 1968, so I wouldn't count him until then.[/QUOTE]


When did this interview take place?

And no you don't have to be incredibly talantad to have a great band

[QUOTE=RobJones]No matter what you say, he's been extremely successful, and also proves you don't have to be a virtuoso to be in one of the biggest bands ever.[/QUOTE]

None of the Beatles are exactly "virtuosos" of their instruments.

But George is incredibly talented.