[QUOTE=honeydutchautopsy;17611678]lol band is really called "Sup"?[/QUOTE]

well it's SUP. dont know if it stands for anything, but it's not short for "what's up"

EDIT: it stands for Spherical Unit Provided. and i guess they have some albums under the name Supuration

Rasputina - [I]Oh Perilous World[/I]

[QUOTE]well thanks for giving me the most general description possible.

i always see stuff labelled indie in blogs and i like my fair share of indie-ish **** but i never download any because that's not any kind of description of the music![/QUOTE]
well idk your tastes that well so i can't really recommend it to you

and i can't really objectively describe it to you, the best i can do is just "it's an emotional and beautiful folky-indie album". really good to listen to it when you feel sad, i "connected" with the album after listening to it while feeling depressed. listen to it for yourself i guess.

np: Vali - [I]Forlatt[/I]

Bon Iver doesnt need to be described, just ****ing listen to it haha.

Forlatt is so good!

[IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_2BdmGudNDEs/SqmUZiVQtNI/AAAAAAAAAZk/mTD3qJajJKE/s400/bon+iver+-for-emma-forever-ago.jpg[/IMG]

just put this on; didn't look at the thread first. weird.

but yeah listen to it. unbelievable.

Arcade Fire - [I]Funeral[/I]

I've always wanted to listen to that album^, does it live up to indie hype

Radiohead - [I]the bends[/I]

[quote=jaundice]I've always wanted to listen to that album^, does it live up to indie hype[/quote]
yeah dude the album rules


[img]http://www.enucleationrecords.com/catalog/images/record_covers/sleazy007.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i35.tinypic.com/2e3bxib.jpg[/img]

pauses radiohead long enough to call you a hipster

[QUOTE=Jaundice;17611870]I've always wanted to listen to that album^, does it live up to indie hype

Radiohead - [I]the bends[/I][/QUOTE]

the only decent radiohead album (minus the few good songs on Kid A) and the least hipster... i applaud you jorndizzle

I await many posters to tell me how many things are objectively wrong with my subjective post

don't go spreading this around but i think all of their albums are at least pretty good, except maybe for [I]pablo honey [/I]and [I]in rainbows[/I]

[QUOTE=honeydutchautopsy;17611889]the only decent radiohead album (minus the few good songs on Kid A) and the least hipster... i applaud you jorndizzle

I await many posters to tell me how many things are objectively wrong with my subjective post[/QUOTE]

lol your post wasn't subjective at all, you made an objective claim. way to fail at trying to be smart.

but but it was subjective

no it wasn't, he made an objective claim. he said something [i]is[/i] something, not that he thought it was that way, but that it was objectively that way.

he was giving his subjective view of the subject

did you even read what he typed

he said the bends is decent

something can't objectively be decent

yes it can

and dont try to feed me this postmodern bullshit about absolutely everything being subjective

i'm going out west where they appreciate me

nah bro i've read plenty books

oh yah my bad you must be right

[QUOTE=rasputin;17611922]yes it can

and dont try to feed me this postmodern bullpoop about absolutely everything being subjective[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't say everything, but with personal taste i'm willing to believe it's a completely distorted matter from individual to individual

Radiohead - [I]Go To Sleep EP 1[/I]

[quote=haz]
I wouldn't say everything, but with personal taste i'm willing to believe it's a completely distorted matter from individual to individualp/quote]

point is, the dude said something is something. that's an objective statement. he then said something about everyone else making objective responses to his subjective claim, but by his logic the responses would be subjective too, so he's contradicting himself.

this whole 'all music is subjective yo it's just [i]my[/i] opinion' crap is getting tiresome, because music is not entirely subjective. farting in a microphone is not objectively better than tchaikovsky, though someone can subjectively think so if they wish. objectivity exists in music just as much as in anything else. it's just annoying/lol when idiots try and use concepts they don't understand to pass off their poopty opinions on other people.

the point is, he worded himself wrong (hxplicits), making himself look like a retard, and i decided to point that out. urgh

all art is equal

there's no factual standard to make tchaikovsky better than "farting in a microphone"

don't they teach you this at a v young age

rofl no, all art is not equal, and you're a retard if you believe that

art is art

obviously how much you like it is subjective

[QUOTE=rasputin;17611937]rofl no, all art is not equal, and you're a retard if you believe that[/QUOTE]
can you at least make a vague point to support this like i did

wrong thread

The Smiths - [I]The Smiths[/I]