who dat

watching people under the stairs

[QUOTE=NEEDTOPOST;18865874]what was the british feast thing[/QUOTE]

show on the bbc where they split the uk up into regions and have three chefs from each compete to represent it at a seasonal celebratory event thing, this year it's for olympic athletes

four course menu, a competition veteran scores every individual dish and the two chefs with the highest overall scores cook the complete menu with a limited allowance of alterations for a panel of food critics at the end of the week to go through to the semis

in the north west england heat for the fish course some guy made a sort of sea diorama 'inspired by poseidon' with edible sand made of crystallised anchovy oil and maltodextrin, some kind of smoked anchovy and caviar gel, bunch of other shit but no bit of fish bigger than an anchovy and it was a complete ripoff of a famous dish that was mentioned earlier in the show

he got a 2 out of 10 and he walked off the show

cue loads of 'if you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen' bullshit from competitors + unsympathetic judge

white people being pretentious about tea

watching [I]Melancholia[/I]

[QUOTE=Glitterati;18865897]who dat[/QUOTE]

On 12 September 1996, obsessed fan Ricardo López mailed an acid-spraying letter bomb to Björk's London home and then killed himself, but the package was intercepted by the Metropolitan Police Service.[73] López filmed himself in the process of making the acid bomb which was intended to severely scar the singer's face and torso. The nearly 18 hours of videotape described López's obsession with Björk, the construction of the device, his thoughts on love and other subjects, including racial remarks against Björk's then-boyfriend Goldie. The video footage continues after his mailing the bomb to Björk's London home and ends as López shaves his head, applies face paint and commits suicide by shooting himself on camera.[74]
In her few public comments on this event, Bjork later said it was hard emotionally, and it disrupted her life and work in London, explaining in part why she chose to leave the UK scene for good, reject her cute image, and began to write more personally with Homogenic (1997).

never heard of that guy

interesting

shut up fathead

you've probably seen the gif of his suicide

doubt it

only well known suicide i've seen is Budd Dwyer

Couldn't find a baker who'd write out my resignation on a cake in icing so had to quit in the traditional style. Feels good man.

was it an amicable split or are they mad with you

inventive

[COLOR="DarkRed"][B][SIZE="7"]shut the fuck up harry, [U][COLOR="Red"]I AM mad[/COLOR][/U] at you[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

referencing in essays and reports is such a timesink

[QUOTE=Haz;18866002]referencing in essays and reports is such a timesink[/QUOTE]

yup

[QUOTE=Aaron;18865974]Couldn't find a baker who'd write out my resignation on a cake in icing so had to quit in the traditional style. Feels good man.[/QUOTE]

silly australia

but lol that would've been awesome

[QUOTE=Haz;18866002]referencing in essays and reports is such a timesink[/QUOTE]

1. wikipedia
2. ibid.
3. ibid.
4. ibid.

ad infinitum

I'm not allowed to cite wikipedia and I have hesitations even citing anything off the internet cause everytime I write an annotated bibliography I consider its validity and think "this is crap".

it's like chasing a paper trail of disbelief I don't know what is real and what's not

don't use anything online that isn't cited - check their citations

These websites invariably trail back to obscure publications I can't easily get a hold of to see what they used and in what context and I suspect these books will probably cite something else until finally we arrive at something we can consider primary research then the primary research and how it is interpreted is likely to have flaws and has been scrutinised for its methodology. I suppose this is what peer-reviewed information is all about but there seems to be criticism over the validity of these processes too, FUCK.

I'm Neo in The Matrix woooooooo

you don't need a primary source just a credible secondary one

depending on what you're doing of course

really you should be structuring your argument entirely around things you have researched down to the origin but that's something you learn to do over time

i remember i did a jazz studies essay in first year that used a lot of interview transcriptions from a big sort of coffee table anthology

once i started referencing i ended up completely restructuring the essay because i got a hold of the original interview tapes

hey

hey

sup son

sup?

playing fable 2

i ruv dis game so faww

playing nhl 94 and listening to zeppelin

water u guys doin

you playing that on genesis or snes?

smoking a bowl, listening to my bitter end

enjoying this for nostalgia's sake, but i'm struggling to figure out why my friends think this is so incredible

they're sick live though, so whatever, stoked to play shows with them soon