Sputnik Music Forums

Sputnik Music Forums (http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/index.php)
-   Punk (http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Band Profile: NOFX- Pop-Punk Must Know Number Three (http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=362709)

AIRIC 05-01-2006 08:30 PM

No because I think PCL is better.

FauxApathy 05-01-2006 08:47 PM

That's funny. That Propaghandi song could have easily been a Nofx song.

They try to make a song ripping on Nofx, and they make a song in which the lyrics are similar to many, many nofx songs.

Jersey's Best Dancer 05-01-2006 09:12 PM

[QUOTE=FauxApathy]That's funny. That Propaghandi song could have easily been a Nofx song.

They try to make a song ripping on Nofx, and they make a song in which the lyrics are similar to many, many nofx songs.[/QUOTE]

Well at the begining it kinda is, but NOFX could never write songs like Prop. Even tho I dont agree w/ a lot of what prop says, they express themselves in a pretty good way lyrically. NOFX isnt as good at political songs lyrically.

Weezerfan_returns 05-01-2006 11:21 PM

[QUOTE=FloggingMurphy]

Propagandhi - 1, NOFX - 0

I like both bands, but when it comes to lyrical content of the 2 songs.. well, come on haha. The whole first half of Prop's song rips NOFX and 'Seperation of Church and Skate' apart.[/QUOTE]

I think that One Celled Creature is better than Rock For.... but they are both good songs, and they are both great bands.

They say opinions are like as[B]s[/B]holes, everyone has one.

Gnarmageddon 05-02-2006 05:33 AM

[QUOTE=FloggingMurphy]Propagandhi - 1, NOFX - 0

I like both bands, but when it comes to lyrical content of the 2 songs.. well, come on haha. The whole first half of Prop's song rips NOFX and 'Seperation of Church and Skate' apart.[/QUOTE]
Try listening to The Decline.

Drop The Baby 05-02-2006 06:45 AM

[QUOTE=allofmeoliveme]Try listening to The Decline.[/QUOTE]

In that context.....

Seperation Of Church And Skate is a blinding song.

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 07:37 AM

Wern't Propagandhi on Fat? Maybe they still are? I don't know, but if they were then it would be stupid to slate it

TakeWarning 05-02-2006 07:56 AM

[QUOTE=<---NoFX--->]Wern't Propagandhi on Fat? Maybe they still are? I don't know, but if they were then it would be stupid to slate it[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I don't get why Fat Mike doesn't just drop them from his record label if he dislikes them so much.

I guess it's probably because they sell alot of records.

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 08:27 AM

Fat signs one record deals. I've got a feeling they won't be re signing Propagandhi. I don't think Prop. even wants to be on Fat.

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 10:36 AM

[QUOTE=Weezerfan_returns]Fat signs one record deals. I've got a feeling they won't be re signing Propagandhi. I don't think Prop. even wants to be on Fat.[/QUOTE]

Then why not leave? I don't see how they can slate Mike, who is a good guy anyway and the label that they are on. It's hipocritical

holy_roller99 05-02-2006 10:47 AM

it is one of my dreams to work at epitaph or fat most likely at west beach as a recording techinician.

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:28 AM

[QUOTE=holy_roller99]it is one of my dreams to work at fat [/QUOTE]
It is one of my dreams.... to BE fat.

[QUOTE=<---NoFX--->]Then why not leave? I don't see how they can slate Mike, who is a good guy anyway and the label that they are on. It's hipocritical[/QUOTE]
Like I said... they signed a one record deal (PCL) and now they will leave. You can't call them out for this... unless of course their next record comes out on Fat.

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 11:32 AM

I take your point, although I think that it's unfair on Mike and NoFX as Fat have hooked them up with a deal

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:34 AM

hooked them up? Fuc'k, any label in their right minds would sign Propagandhi.

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 11:35 AM

Perhaps in your opinion, they're pretty average in my eyes. PCL is an ok album

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:36 AM

Yeah, but the three albums before that were badass. Even PCL was a decent album, just not as good as Prop's other stuff.

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:37 AM

Propagandhi is a pretty big name, having them on your label is only going to help.

Drop The Baby 05-02-2006 11:39 AM

They're good, but Fat still took them on. It seems to me that it wouldn't have been a great deal on Fat's part to take on a band that don't tour and release albums every five years if they were purely into money.

And it seems to me that all the talk of Propagandhi's trouble with Fat has sprung up really quickly after the release of PCL, despite releasing things on Fat over a number of years

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 11:40 AM

They are a pretty big name band. But what it really comes down to is

NoFX > Propagandhi

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:41 AM

On the back of Less Talk, More Rock, it says somethign like "so what if we're signed to Fat Wreck Chords" and from what I understand, Propagandhi and Fat have been having trouble ever since TETA.

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 11:43 AM

[QUOTE=Drop The Baby]They're good, but Fat still took them on. It seems to me that it wouldn't have been a great deal on Fat's part to take on a band that don't tour and release albums every five years if they were purely into money.

And it seems to me that all the talk of Propagandhi's trouble with Fat has sprung up really quickly after the release of PCL, despite releasing things on Fat over a number of years[/QUOTE]

The first song I heard by Propagandhi was Back To The Motor League and I got that MP3 off the Fat site, I was pretty sure the album that was released on was also on Fat otherwise why would the MP3 be on there

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:45 AM

Yeah it was on TETA..... what is your point?

Drop The Baby 05-02-2006 11:48 AM

[QUOTE=Weezerfan_returns]On the back of Less Talk, More Rock, it says somethign like "so what if we're signed to Fat Wreck Chords" and from what I understand, Propagandhi and Fat have been having trouble ever since TETA.[/QUOTE]

Which proves that to an extent <--NOFX--> was right to say they were being a bit hypocritical for remaining on the label they appear to have sucg problemns with.


And, as was brilliantly said above: NOFX > Propagandhi

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 11:48 AM

So they've had two releases on Fat and you said that their 'beef' started after TETA so why go back if they have a problem with the label, especially if it started before their most recent album

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 11:48 AM

[QUOTE=Drop The Baby]Which proves that to an extent <--NOFX--> was right to say they were being a bit hypocritical for remaining on the label they appear to have sucg problemns with.


And, as was brilliantly said above: NOFX > Propagandhi[/QUOTE]

Thank you

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:49 AM

Because I don't think they've had a big problem with Fat until now. I think things have just escalated.

Drop The Baby 05-02-2006 11:51 AM

Well to be honest none of us will ever know until one of the parties makes a statement or something. We just guessing and that's getting no where to be honest.

La la ala alalala ala shs

Weezerfan_returns 05-02-2006 11:53 AM

True. I think propagandhi are being dumba[B]ss[/B]es.

Fat treats their bands really well, and is pretty damn independent. At the same time, they have a lot of great resources.

Man, i wish my band was on Fat.

<---NoFX---> 05-02-2006 12:01 PM

You're band is good, I check them out the other day




















The Decline has just come on!!!

Jersey's Best Dancer 05-02-2006 01:32 PM

[QUOTE=allofmeoliveme]Try listening to The Decline.[/QUOTE]

I've heard it too many times, and muscially its great, I never said they werent. That song is lyrically pretty good too, but that's just one song, even tho its long as hell. Overall, I believe Prop gets their politcal point across better than NOFX...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.