still really find the closer to be such a snoozer track when compared to the track right before it. Feels like more of a middle of the pack track or even a slow opener.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
i agree holocene is kinda meh
|
| |
black metal ending of Pleistocene is one of my favorite moments in music this year.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Pleistocene is becoming a favorite of mine and hard agreed
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
pleistocene was my favourite at the beginning but i'm prefering jurassic|cretaceous now. Such a forceful, dynamic song. both rule anyway though
Digging: Crippled Black Phoenix - Ellengaest |
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
[2]
It's such a complete song
Digging: Gloo (UK) - XYZ |
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
re: previous page. I never listen to singles beforehand, I couldn’t even tell you what the singles were initially - now I only (half) know because of this thread and the complaints relating to the subject.
The high points eclipse the rest of the album significantly, those being Triassic, Jurassic and Pleistocene. As much as I do enjoy this there’s definitely a sense of just waiting for the latter, once the former two tracks have ended. Everything in between is somewhat anti-climactic in comparison.
Digging: Mesa Verde - The Old Road |
| |
If I gave Pelagial a hard 3.5 is this worth my time? Trying to catch up on some of the more revered albums of 2020 that I missed, and I know a lot of friends that love this.
Digging: Boldy James and The Alchemist - The Price Of Tea In China |
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Are you saying that’s a bad thing? - either way this is very different and brings more than a few fresh elements to the table. It’s worth at least checking ‘Jurassic/Cretaceous’ to see what you think.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I'd spin Phan I first but ya this is also real good
Digging: Lovebites - Electric Pentagram |
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
As someone who also 3.5'd Pelegial, spin Phan 1 first [2] but this is also great
Digging: Orchid - Orchid |
| |
Hmm, alright.
'Are you saying that’s a bad thing? - either way this is very different and brings more than a few fresh elements to the table.'
No, not at all. Would you say this is more proggy?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
more post-y than proggy, I would say
compared to Pelegial at least
|
| |
That's great to hear. I'll jam this and one today or tomorrow. I am right on the brink of loving Pelagial, just don't love the vocals (even though they fit and aren't bad, just preference.)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This is proggier than Pelagial (or Phan: I) for my money. They cover more ground here.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Phan I >> Phan II those guys are tripping
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
It is yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Triassic: 5/5
Jurassic/Cretaceous: 5/5
Palaeocene: 4/5
Eocene: 3/5
Oligocene: 3.5/5
Miocene: 3/5
Pleistocene: 3.5/5
Holocene: 3/5
https://gyazo.com/8ee3ebbd5ae9822926c12803e891f3b5
|
| |
That's great to hear. I'll jam this and one today or tomorrow. I am right on the brink of loving Pelagial, just don't love the vocals (even though they fit and aren't bad, just preference.)
Just play the instrumental baby
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Imagine giving Pleistocene a mere 3.5/5.
|
| |
|