Toothgrinder
I Am


3.0
good

Review

by Squizzy USER (2 Reviews)
October 15th, 2019 | 14 replies


Release Date: 2019 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Identity crisis strikes.

Toothgrinder is a band that’s gone through quite a change up in their lifespan. While showing some pretty good prog-metal flashes on their early work in Schizophrenic Jubilee and Nocturnal Masqurade, it appeared that Toothgrinder were going to make a splash in the metal scene and be “the next big thing” (anecdotally of course).

What came after Nocturnal Masqurade was about as unexpected as anyone could have guessed with Phantom Amour, which showed the band going into a bit more of an atmospheric, mainstream metal direction. The thing about that album was that, while being almost a complete 180 compared to what people thought it was going to be, it was still good. Different, but refreshing and well done. That brings us to I AM, the newest album which shows the band leaning more towards that mainstream sound while still maintaining some of the early Toothgrinder sound.

The unfortunate reality of this album as a whole piece is that it doesn’t quite know what it wants to be, and is rather scattered and all over the place. Album opener “The Silence Of A Sleeping WASP” mixes sounds of Nocturnal Masquerade in the verses and some of the instrumentation and Phantom Amour in the chorus, and for the most part the song succeeds. The only detractor from this song is the “whoa-oh-oh”’s that are found throughout, but they don’t completely kill the song. The next song “ohmymy” is a song that was manufactured for the sake of being on the radio. The song itself is a simple verse-chorus structure with the chorus meant for singing along at live shows. That in and of itself is not all bad, but the dichotomy of the songs can be a bit jarring.

In many other songs, it seems the band tried to retain the heaviness that was found in Nocturnal Masqurade while also trying to mix in the styles of Phantom Amour, to varying degrees of success. When the band commits to one more than the other, they can pull it off. This is shown in songs like “No Tribe”, “The New Punk Rock” and “The Fire of June”. While the songs themselves are more mainstream than what’s found on Nocturnal Masqurade, they still show that the band can write catchy, melodic hooks with some bite, but are mainly leaning towards one or the other for style of song they were attempting to write. The rest of the album however shows a bit more of the lackluster results that come from what appears to be almost an identity crisis.

Songs like “too soft for the scene, TOO MEAN FOR THE GREEN” (don’t get me started on some of these song titles), “shiVer” and “My Favorite Hurt” show some odd decisions in their process. “too soft…”, for example, seems to be trying to be heavy for no other reason than to be heavy. It certainly doesn’t help that the chorus of the song is just weird by itself. “shiVer” is nothing more than an electronic interlude with some drumming, and while not bad, isn’t really necessary, and “My Favorite Hurt” would be ten times better without the odd instrumental sounds going on post chorus. I’m not even sure what the sound is, but it takes what could be a passable song and kills it.

Luckily, the song “I AM” finds the band at their best. The poignant lyrics of addiction and the simple, yet effective, instrumentation craft what I consider the best song on the album. While instrumentally, it doesn’t touch Nocturnal Masqurade, it doesn’t need to. The lyrics are what take the forefront with the instruments driving the song through, and it’s done very well.

All that being said...I find myself enjoying this album. Phantom Amour had the same effect on me at first, and that album grew to be one of my favorites of 2017. I feel like this album is a good mix of what was on Nocturnal Masqurade and Phantom Amour, however it is unable to succeed at being as good as either of those albums were able to. This album has some good peaks, but the same amount of valleys to get through. It could grow on me, but as of right now, this ranks as their weakest release to date.


user ratings (28)
2.8
good


Comments:Add a Comment 
Squizzy
October 15th 2019


26 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Review number 2 from me. Constructive criticism always welcome, just don't go too hard on me. Still figuring this whole thing out.

SitarHero
October 15th 2019


14697 Comments


Good review. The song titles are bad, but "too soft for the scene" is a jam and a half. Solid dumb fun.

Also, real quick. Italicise album names with [ i ]album name[ / i ]

Calc
October 15th 2019


17339 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

this band is butt rock now. and congrats to them it's obviously what they were wanting to do since they formed.

SitarHero
October 15th 2019


14697 Comments


They're pretty self aware imo. They already wrote a song about people complaining about them being butt rock now. xD

Squizzy
October 15th 2019


26 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@SitarHerp - I knew I was missing something. I’ll probably go back and edit. As for “too soft...” I dunno, it just doesn’t resonate with me as much. Grower maybe?



@Calc - I wouldn’t say it’s “butt rock” but it’s certainly not in the level of their other albums. I enjoy it, but I was let down compared to the last few albums.

Calc
October 15th 2019


17339 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I mean that's all well and good but being self aware butt rockers still means you play butt rock. it's whatever though. their first EP is still great.

SitarHero
October 15th 2019


14697 Comments


I dunno about it being a grower, but I think it's self-aware enough to be humorous. And that chorus is so dumb but so catchy. These guys can write some MASSIVE hooks, so it's really not a bad idea for them to be a full-on butt rock band.

SitarHero
October 15th 2019


14697 Comments


Also, it's interesting that the first album you reviewed was White Bat, squizzy, cos that's the album that I'd compare this to the most. It's just trying to be a fun rock record and it mostly succeeds.

Squizzy
October 15th 2019


26 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Huh, good point. That’s a good comparison. I’d still give White Bat the upper hand here though.

Beardog
October 15th 2019


5179 Comments


Wanna check, I thought I Am was pretty cool, but the other single was very boring

Beardog
October 17th 2019


5179 Comments


The production is way too brickwalled, which is sad. It hurts to listen to.

Squizzy
October 17th 2019


26 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah, I didn’t touch on production but it’s not great. Phantom Amour I thought hit the sweet spot on their production.

Beardog
October 18th 2019


5179 Comments


It still needed a lot of work, but it did sound a lot better than this

bloc
November 4th 2019


69985 Comments


Garb



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy