Carly Rae Jepsen Dedicated
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
sixdegrees
May 26th 2019


10373 Comments


good luck

JustJoe.
May 26th 2019


9909 Comments


šŸ˜–

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
May 26th 2019


29867 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2

thread got feral

JustJoe.
May 26th 2019


9909 Comments


More like Carly BAE.

Okay, Iā€™m done now.

Brostep
Staff Reviewer
May 26th 2019


4491 Comments

Album Rating: 3.4

hey GL! appreciate you chiming in - genuinely always on the hunt for constructive criticism and would love some feedback as to where my review falls short if you'd be interested in giving it. no complaints about Granite's review, and I published late in part to give it a chance to roll through the feature queue, just wondering :]

GhostB1rd
May 26th 2019


7497 Comments


I'm sorry I don't take directions from someone a year removed from undergrad.

GhostB1rd
May 26th 2019


7497 Comments


Unless she's hot, in which case, maybe.

Get Low
May 26th 2019


8634 Comments


My reasons for preferring Granite's review are purely subjective, and I feel that I don't have anything to offer you in terms of constructive criticism (I know the main purpose of your comment was to be a cunt, but still). I just prefer shorter, more concise reviews; and judging from your Dedicated review as well a going through some of your others, you seem to prefer writing a short story for each album. Which is fine, it's just not my style.

"I published late in part to give it a chance to roll through the feature queue"
For some reason I don't fully believe this, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.


BlushfulHippocrene
Staff Reviewer
May 26th 2019


3513 Comments


"I published late in part to give it a chance to roll through the feature queue"

For what it's worth, this does seem to be the case. In general -- and this is part experience, part conjecture -- a user/contrib review won't be featured where a staff review is in the works unless a) the review is excellent (as in this case), and b) the staff reviewer is consulted and/or offers the feature up (the latter in this case). Again, for what it's worth -- and I'm not convinced it matters too much -- I think Granite is an excellent writer and the amount of (well-deserved) features he gets reflects that well. But I don't think Brostep's comment is intended to be cuntish, and from what I've seen, most of the staff are well-meaning/thoughtful about this stuff. Don't wanna speak for us all, but no harm intended, not a fan of this whole user/contrib/staff divide -- not just because this is a hobby / passion thing for most of us (most of the site, I mean), but because anyone who does feel a sense of entitlement about it (staff or contrib or user) is a bit silly.

Asdfp277
May 26th 2019


23038 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

was this discussion necessary

BlushfulHippocrene
Staff Reviewer
May 26th 2019


3513 Comments


I mean, as necessary as any non-music discussion on a music form -- which is to say, yes, if people engage in it.

Asdfp277
May 26th 2019


23038 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yea

luci
May 26th 2019


12527 Comments


carly threads are meant to be negativity-free zones. you have the right words at the wrong time :>

BlushfulHippocrene
Staff Reviewer
May 26th 2019


3513 Comments


Aaa. Just started listening, if the rest is as good as Julien: LOVE. c:

Asdfp277
May 26th 2019


23038 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

posi vibes~

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
May 26th 2019


29867 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2

real real love!

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
May 27th 2019


31811 Comments


cant speak for my peers but i actually only write reviews to "cuck" the contribs



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2019 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy